Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Literally LOL'ed!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Literally LOL'ed! Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/19/2014 10:50:09 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?


Websites (with commerce functions) can be started for under $150.00.

Every state has craigslist, every craigslist has a free section (so does freecycle...there are others), each of which has products that with spit and polish can be cleaned up enough to sell at a profit.

Legal zoom can incorporate for 50 bucks.

Once he's made a few bucks (and saved the profits) he can seek out suppliers that will sell him products at upwards of a 60% discount.

If he doesn't want to inventory goods, he can negotiate Manufacturers rep. arrangements where they pay upwards of 12% to rep the manufacturers products and have them drop shipped from the manufacturers location...with the sellers invoice as if it came from his website.

There's about 30,000 other ways someone can start with essentially nothing but, as Desi so accurately stated above, few want to make the effort...bitching, whining and complaining that it can't be done is much easier.

Everyone that believes success is impossible is....correct.



< Message edited by LookieNoNookie -- 3/19/2014 10:51:07 PM >

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/19/2014 10:52:50 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
No one is forced to work at a specific place. Everyone chooses to work where they work. Ya'all might think that you have to be able to afford X, Y, and Z, or else you aren't getting paid enough. That's not true. There are almost always ways to reduce X, Y and Z to get within your budget. I know people who skipped cable so they could use those resources in areas they felt were more important. Just because you want X, Y, and Z doesn't mean your employer has to pay you enough to have them.

What you're saying is true, but isn't it also just as true from the other side as well? No one is forcing the employer to pay lousy wages. The employer could pay higher wages and do without X, Y, and Z himself, couldn't he/she? And if he/she doesn't do that, isn't it the employees' right to call him/her a cheap bastard?


The difference is, it's the employer's business. That's the difference. You want to call the shots? Start the business. When it's your business, and your capital that's on the line, you get to make the rules (to an extent).



(And then they can pay their employees 65 grand a year because "it's the right thing to do")

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/19/2014 10:54:05 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
life
rent, food, hydro, taxes, family obligations, life obligations,
specific employer?could it have something to do with the lack of jobs ?


Has there always been a "lack of jobs," Lucy?

Didn't think so.

What is stopping these people forced into working for a shitty company from getting a job at a "not shitty" company, or starting their own "not shitty" company?

Instead of pissing, moaning and bitching into their Corn Flakes, they could pull up their big boy/girl underwear/panties, and make their own life. Couldn't they?


NORTH DAKOTA WANTS YOU!: 20,000 jobs to fill
http://money.cnn.com/pf/america-boomtown/

I doubled my salary in North Dakota
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2011/pf/1110/gallery.America_boomtown_salary/?iid=EL

Earn $2,000 a night as a boomtown stripper
http://money.cnn.com/2011/10/25/pf/America_boomtown_strippers/index.htm?iid=SF_PF_River

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/19/2014 10:54:15 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
because they have to?
I dunno you ask em
making a stand against shitty employers only works if you can leave?


Who is making them work there? No one has to work for any specific employer. I don't know if it's different up North, but here in the States, no one is forcing anyone to work at a particular business.


I agree, fuck 'em...let them eat cake.


(That's more than many small business owners get to eat).

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/19/2014 10:56:22 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?

Depends on the type of business. I've been self-employed since I was 18. All it took was doing a little homework on business ownership and $10 every 5 years to keep my business registered. I didn't need a lawyer, I don't have a website, my suppliers ship to my home, and I can write off a portion of my costs of living directly off my taxes. Getting customers takes ground pounding and some actual ambition but it can be done.


Noooo....that's just crazy talk.

Starting a business when you have 5 kids and a mountain of debt is impossible....we know this to be true because everyone who doesn't have the balls to start a business said so.

It can't be done.

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/19/2014 11:04:13 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?

Depends on the type of business. I've been self-employed since I was 18. All it took was doing a little homework on business ownership and $10 every 5 years to keep my business registered. I didn't need a lawyer, I don't have a website, my suppliers ship to my home, and I can write off a portion of my costs of living directly off my taxes. Getting customers takes ground pounding and some actual ambition but it can be done.


Noooo....that's just crazy talk.

Starting a business when you have 5 kids and a mountain of debt is impossible....we know this to be true because everyone who doesn't have the balls to start a business said so.

It can't be done.

not everyone has the brains to do that tho, some people I have talked to make me feel sorry for them cuz they will be in their shitty job for the rest of their lives and be eating cat food when they retire (when they are too old to continue working).. Some people just don't have what it takes to be in their own business, I have talked to people that have tried and run tail back to the "security" of working for someone else.. But then that's all good for the ones that can.. less competition and all..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/19/2014 11:06:48 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?

Depends on the type of business. I've been self-employed since I was 18. All it took was doing a little homework on business ownership and $10 every 5 years to keep my business registered. I didn't need a lawyer, I don't have a website, my suppliers ship to my home, and I can write off a portion of my costs of living directly off my taxes. Getting customers takes ground pounding and some actual ambition but it can be done.


Noooo....that's just crazy talk.

Starting a business when you have 5 kids and a mountain of debt is impossible....we know this to be true because everyone who doesn't have the balls to start a business said so.

It can't be done.

You wanna know what part really sucks? When you get the $35,000 tax bill because you didn't have to take out all the bullshit they usually get from a regular paycheck. If I could have kept all the money I gave for Social Security over the years and invested it myself, I'd have a 7-digit retirement account right now. But noooooooooo. I'm not allowed to go it alone and be responsible for myself. That's just plain selfish.


_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/19/2014 11:31:12 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?

Depends on the type of business. I've been self-employed since I was 18. All it took was doing a little homework on business ownership and $10 every 5 years to keep my business registered. I didn't need a lawyer, I don't have a website, my suppliers ship to my home, and I can write off a portion of my costs of living directly off my taxes. Getting customers takes ground pounding and some actual ambition but it can be done.


Noooo....that's just crazy talk.

Starting a business when you have 5 kids and a mountain of debt is impossible....we know this to be true because everyone who doesn't have the balls to start a business said so.

It can't be done.

not everyone has the brains to do that tho, some people I have talked to make me feel sorry for them cuz they will be in their shitty job for the rest of their lives and be eating cat food when they retire (when they are too old to continue working).. Some people just don't have what it takes to be in their own business, I have talked to people that have tried and run tail back to the "security" of working for someone else.. But then that's all good for the ones that can.. less competition and all..

I won't say owning your own business is always easy. It's not. But in reality, there are ways to make money from your home that a monkey is almost capable of doing. Data entry, technical support, sales, even parts assembly. You just have to be willing to do the homework to figure it out. The real beauty of working from home is the tax breaks. I use one of my spare bedrooms as a home office. It takes up about 12% of the total floor space of my home. Because of that, I can directly write 12% of the cost of my utilities, mortgage, insurance, and more, from my income as a business expense. I get to write off the full value of all my computer equipment and I'm also allowed to deduct $0.52 for every mile I drive in my car for business. That may not seem like a lot but believe me, it adds up over time. And ANYONE can do that...at least in the US. I don't know about Canada.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 6:23:01 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
You seem to be lumping every business into one category and making it sound like they all abuse their positions. That's simply not true.

I wasn't lumping them all together, but some of them might abuse their positions, which is why there needs to be regulation and supervision of the business sector. Just like we have laws to restrain government and a (supposedly) vigilant citizenry to watch them.
But I'll concede that individual businesses are just like individual citizens - some are good responsible citizens and some are not.
However, I'll mention that most of the regulations and instances of government interfering in the private sector are/were to deal with the bad apples and those who abuse(d) their positions. So, whenever anyone shows resistance or ideological opposition to government interfering in the private sector, it makes it look like they're trying to protect the bad apples.
I'm not saying that all businesses are bad, but it seems like so many free market types insist on keeping the bad apples in the barrel just for the sake of ideological orthodoxy. If an honest business person doesn't want to be tarred with the brush of their peers, then they should be the first ones to support reform and weeding out the bad apples; they shouldn't oppose it just for ideological reasons. They should think in practical terms, as one might expect from a business person.


There is a need for some regulation and government intervention. Absolutely. It should be all about the consumer, though. Make it illegal to lie in advertising and packaging (which, is really just more advertising), and penalize those who commit that crime. That's not all about the consumer, though, as there will be businesses that benefit from "forcing" (or penalizing) their competitors that lie. But, it's a definite consumer protection. If a regulation results in less competition and higher prices for consumers, then, maybe it's not a good regulation.

quote]
quote:

You are also equating the free market system with the crony capitalism system that we have today. The more influence government exerts in the market, the more beneficial it is for business to attempt to sway government.

If that's the system that we have, then why would anyone in the business community be complaining at all? The system is already stacked in their favor, and they already have oodles of influence in the government anyway. That's why nothing ever really changes and there's never any true reform in our political or economic systems.

Why? Uh, because not all businesses are benefiting to the same extent.

quote:

quote:

An interesting read here.

Interesting. I don't know if really have the same kind of crony capitalism today that we had back in the 19th century. There have been a lot of changes between then and now.
I think this goes back to what I was saying earlier. I respect that you have a certain ideal and a set of principles about capitalism and the free market, and that you also say that what we have today is not in line with those principles. Fair enough. I don't know how or if this ideal would ever be implemented in American society, as the symbiotic relationship between government and business seems so hopelessly twisted and tangled.
It's not that I disagree entirely with the free market or certain core principles of capitalism. But I don't really see an economic system as the be all and end all of our society. I don't see it as some kind of sacrosanct thing that must always remain as the gods have ordained. It's just a system, after all. We can change it. We can fix it...perhaps...but only until America gets out of this ideological feedback loop that we seem to be stuck in.


Capitalism is a component of a society. A system of government is also a component of society. Those two can overlap, too.

Can we fix it? I don't know. I sure as hell hope so. The best way to fix it (which is likely the least popular, sadly), is to reduce the extent to which government picks winners and losers (special carve outs) and not by giving away even more, but only to the current favorite sector.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 7:51:04 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
There is a need for some regulation and government intervention. Absolutely. It should be all about the consumer, though. Make it illegal to lie in advertising and packaging (which, is really just more advertising), and penalize those who commit that crime.


I agree with this completely. I actually think that anyone who gets in front of a public podium, camera, microphone, etc., they should be considered under oath and be subject to perjury charges if they lie. This could come in especially handy when it comes to political candidates and their advertisements. Impeachment could be made much easier and would force them to be very, very careful about every promise and every utterance they make.

quote:


That's not all about the consumer, though, as there will be businesses that benefit from "forcing" (or penalizing) their competitors that lie. But, it's a definite consumer protection. If a regulation results in less competition and higher prices for consumers, then, maybe it's not a good regulation.


And I would concede that there probably are some bad and/or unnecessary regulations out there. But there might be other societal level considerations beyond consumer protection or lower prices. There are environmental concerns, conservation of resources, national security issues, political stability, etc.

quote:

quote:


If that's the system that we have, then why would anyone in the business community be complaining at all? The system is already stacked in their favor, and they already have oodles of influence in the government anyway. That's why nothing ever really changes and there's never any true reform in our political or economic systems.


Why? Uh, because not all businesses are benefiting to the same extent.


You mean some businesses are complaining about inequality and unfairness? Isn't that what the workers who were "whining, moaning, and pissing" doing too? If your position is that an individual fails due to a lack of skills, drive, ambition, etc. and has to work for crappy wages as a consequence, wouldn't that also be true for a business that fails? They can't blame it on regulation or taxes or anything else the government does, since other businesses have had proven success under the same conditions.

quote:


Capitalism is a component of a society. A system of government is also a component of society. Those two can overlap, too.

Can we fix it? I don't know. I sure as hell hope so. The best way to fix it (which is likely the least popular, sadly), is to reduce the extent to which government picks winners and losers (special carve outs) and not by giving away even more, but only to the current favorite sector.


That may help, although I'm not sure if it goes deep enough to get to the root of the problem. The problem is really within government. If business is out of control, it's only because the government hasn't done anything to deal with them. There's no doubt a lot of favoritism, cronyism, good-old-boy networks, etc. in the system, and this is what has to be addressed.

But I also think that Americans from both side of the spectrum might have to be more ideologically flexible than they currently are.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 8:14:30 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
There is a need for some regulation and government intervention. Absolutely. It should be all about the consumer, though. Make it illegal to lie in advertising and packaging (which, is really just more advertising), and penalize those who commit that crime.

I agree with this completely. I actually think that anyone who gets in front of a public podium, camera, microphone, etc., they should be considered under oath and be subject to perjury charges if they lie. This could come in especially handy when it comes to political candidates and their advertisements. Impeachment could be made much easier and would force them to be very, very careful about every promise and every utterance they make.
quote:

That's not all about the consumer, though, as there will be businesses that benefit from "forcing" (or penalizing) their competitors that lie. But, it's a definite consumer protection. If a regulation results in less competition and higher prices for consumers, then, maybe it's not a good regulation.

And I would concede that there probably are some bad and/or unnecessary regulations out there. But there might be other societal level considerations beyond consumer protection or lower prices. There are environmental concerns, conservation of resources, national security issues, political stability, etc.


Government should not have carte blanche to do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, to whomever it wants. Damn near anything can get rationalized as being "National Security." As long as a politician can rationalize something, he/she can do it.

That's abuse of power and definitely not proper.

quote:

quote:

quote:

If that's the system that we have, then why would anyone in the business community be complaining at all? The system is already stacked in their favor, and they already have oodles of influence in the government anyway. That's why nothing ever really changes and there's never any true reform in our political or economic systems.

Why? Uh, because not all businesses are benefiting to the same extent.

You mean some businesses are complaining about inequality and unfairness? Isn't that what the workers who were "whining, moaning, and pissing" doing too? If your position is that an individual fails due to a lack of skills, drive, ambition, etc. and has to work for crappy wages as a consequence, wouldn't that also be true for a business that fails? They can't blame it on regulation or taxes or anything else the government does, since other businesses have had proven success under the same conditions.


Yes, they are complaining about inequality and unfairness. Government should treat each and every business the same way. No one business, or sector should get treated differently. That's unfair and unequal.

The most ignored thing in a Capitalistic economy - and the second most important thing - is loss. Without loss, business will inefficiently consume resources, and will eventually drive up costs. As long as their competitors are living under the same regulatory structure, they can't blame government. And, as I have said many times before on this very board, failed businesses can and should be learning tools for how to not do things. Government propping up a failed business doesn't send the proper signal that that failed business model doesn't work.

quote:

quote:

Capitalism is a component of a society. A system of government is also a component of society. Those two can overlap, too.
Can we fix it? I don't know. I sure as hell hope so. The best way to fix it (which is likely the least popular, sadly), is to reduce the extent to which government picks winners and losers (special carve outs) and not by giving away even more, but only to the current favorite sector.

That may help, although I'm not sure if it goes deep enough to get to the root of the problem. The problem is really within government. If business is out of control, it's only because the government hasn't done anything to deal with them. There's no doubt a lot of favoritism, cronyism, good-old-boy networks, etc. in the system, and this is what has to be addressed.
But I also think that Americans from both side of the spectrum might have to be more ideologically flexible than they currently are.


Yup. Sadly, as soon as one starts to bend, the other will start to really hammer away rather than bend in return.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 8:58:21 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

I won't say owning your own business is always easy. It's not. But in reality, there are ways to make money from your home that a monkey is almost capable of doing. Data entry, technical support, sales, even parts assembly. You just have to be willing to do the homework to figure it out. The real beauty of working from home is the tax breaks. I use one of my spare bedrooms as a home office. It takes up about 12% of the total floor space of my home. Because of that, I can directly write 12% of the cost of my utilities, mortgage, insurance, and more, from my income as a business expense. I get to write off the full value of all my computer equipment and I'm also allowed to deduct $0.52 for every mile I drive in my car for business. That may not seem like a lot but believe me, it adds up over time. And ANYONE can do that...at least in the US. I don't know about Canada.

the tax laws for self-employed/home based business in Canada are similar.. but have you seen all the "work at home" scams out there???? personally I think they are all scams, I personally would not waste my time with those.. but sure, people (if they have the time) can work part-time at avon or whatever in their time after their shitty 9-5 job.. but they have to find something that fits them (that's probably the hardest part) and it has to really make money (as the govt tax dept expects profits within a certain number of years)..No, its not easy.. its probably a lot easier & more profitable to just move to N Dakota and be a stripper! lol

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 2:38:35 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?

Depends on the type of business. I've been self-employed since I was 18. All it took was doing a little homework on business ownership and $10 every 5 years to keep my business registered. I didn't need a lawyer, I don't have a website, my suppliers ship to my home, and I can write off a portion of my costs of living directly off my taxes. Getting customers takes ground pounding and some actual ambition but it can be done.


Noooo....that's just crazy talk.

Starting a business when you have 5 kids and a mountain of debt is impossible....we know this to be true because everyone who doesn't have the balls to start a business said so.

It can't be done.

not everyone has the brains to do that tho, some people I have talked to make me feel sorry for them cuz they will be in their shitty job for the rest of their lives and be eating cat food when they retire (when they are too old to continue working).. Some people just don't have what it takes to be in their own business, I have talked to people that have tried and run tail back to the "security" of working for someone else.. But then that's all good for the ones that can.. less competition and all..


Agreed.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 2:39:41 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?

Depends on the type of business. I've been self-employed since I was 18. All it took was doing a little homework on business ownership and $10 every 5 years to keep my business registered. I didn't need a lawyer, I don't have a website, my suppliers ship to my home, and I can write off a portion of my costs of living directly off my taxes. Getting customers takes ground pounding and some actual ambition but it can be done.


Noooo....that's just crazy talk.

Starting a business when you have 5 kids and a mountain of debt is impossible....we know this to be true because everyone who doesn't have the balls to start a business said so.

It can't be done.

You wanna know what part really sucks? When you get the $35,000 tax bill because you didn't have to take out all the bullshit they usually get from a regular paycheck. If I could have kept all the money I gave for Social Security over the years and invested it myself, I'd have a 7-digit retirement account right now. But noooooooooo. I'm not allowed to go it alone and be responsible for myself. That's just plain selfish.



(I actually don't have a clue what that means).

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 5:04:18 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?

Depends on the type of business. I've been self-employed since I was 18. All it took was doing a little homework on business ownership and $10 every 5 years to keep my business registered. I didn't need a lawyer, I don't have a website, my suppliers ship to my home, and I can write off a portion of my costs of living directly off my taxes. Getting customers takes ground pounding and some actual ambition but it can be done.


Noooo....that's just crazy talk.

Starting a business when you have 5 kids and a mountain of debt is impossible....we know this to be true because everyone who doesn't have the balls to start a business said so.

It can't be done.

You wanna know what part really sucks? When you get the $35,000 tax bill because you didn't have to take out all the bullshit they usually get from a regular paycheck. If I could have kept all the money I gave for Social Security over the years and invested it myself, I'd have a 7-digit retirement account right now. But noooooooooo. I'm not allowed to go it alone and be responsible for myself. That's just plain selfish.



(I actually don't have a clue what that means).

Sorry. I guess in my rant, I wasn't very clear, was I?

The first really profitable year I ever had, I grossed $132,000. Because I'm a self-employed contractor, I get paid like a business, not an employee. Therefore, there are no deductions taken out of that payment. When tax time came around, I had to make up for all the money that most people get taken out of their paycheck automatically. What I had to pay into Social Security that year was $35,000. If I could have saved up all the money for retirement that I've had to turn over to Social Security for everyone else (plus interest), I'd have over a million dollars saved by now. My frustration is that I have no option out of the Social Security system if I don't need it and that many on the left view people like me as selfish simply because I want to be completely responsible for myself and be allowed to reap all the rewards of my own work.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 5:20:38 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
...personally I think they are all scams

Here's the first hurdle you'd need to overcome. Some are scams. I won't deny that. Many are not. That doesn't mean you'll get rich but everything has its trade-offs. You'd have to do your homework.

quote:


...they have to find something that fits them (that's probably the hardest part)

That's also true. You need to know it's a job you're able to do. Being honest with yourself about that is paramount. If you let the fantasy of wealth cloud your judgement, you've already doomed yourself.

quote:


and it has to really make money (as the govt tax dept expects profits within a certain number of years)

I don't know about Canada but there's no obligation to the government to turn a profit in the US. You can continuously lose money and still be in business as far as the IRS is concerned.

quote:


...its probably a lot easier & more profitable to just move to N Dakota and be a stripper! lol

Uh...you obviously haven't seen a picture of me.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 8:56:57 PM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Government should not have carte blanche to do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, to whomever it wants.


I agree, but then, neither should business have carte blanche.

quote:


Damn near anything can get rationalized as being "National Security." As long as a politician can rationalize something, he/she can do it.

That's abuse of power and definitely not proper.


National security is a legitimate concern, although I agree that it can be abused. But usually, such abuses of power tend to affect other portions of society far more than the business community is affected, as a general rule.

quote:


Yes, they are complaining about inequality and unfairness. Government should treat each and every business the same way. No one business, or sector should get treated differently. That's unfair and unequal.


I can see your point, although I think that should be just as true for citizens. I think government should treat each and every individual citizen the same way.

But it should be noted that an individual is at an extreme disadvantage when going up against a group (especially if it's a group with a lot of financial power). The individual needs the government to act as his/her champion against the more powerful organization/business.

However, if businesses are complaining about unfair competition or that government is favoring some businesses over others, then that would be a conflict of business vs. business. I don't see how that would have anything to do with discussions about business vs. workers or business vs. consumers. If the minimum wage is raised, then that would apply to all businesses, wouldn't it?

I can see that some regulations might affect some businesses and sectors more than others. Obviously, regulations governing the operation of nuclear power plants would be different from those governing the operation of airlines or food service. As long as the competition is fair, and the workers and consumers are treated fairly, then it should work okay.

The only time things go awry is when someone in the food chain decides "Hey, I've decided to be unfair - just because I can." That's usually when things end up in court, when government is called upon to intervene. That's another aspect of government intervention in the private sector, since a lot of businesses are pressured not due to regulations or laws, but also due to the everpresent possibility of lawsuits.

This is one area which should probably be addressed in earnest, since it seems evident that the bigger companies, with the deep pockets to be able to afford the best lawyers money can buy, are going to have an advantage over those who can't quite afford such high-priced legal talent (such as a small business or individual). So, if that's what you mean, then I agree with you, although it may require a different kind of regulation.

quote:


The most ignored thing in a Capitalistic economy - and the second most important thing - is loss. Without loss, business will inefficiently consume resources, and will eventually drive up costs. As long as their competitors are living under the same regulatory structure, they can't blame government. And, as I have said many times before on this very board, failed businesses can and should be learning tools for how to not do things. Government propping up a failed business doesn't send the proper signal that that failed business model doesn't work.


If you're referring to bailouts, again, I think we're in complete agreement. I can (kind of, sort of) understand the reasoning behind it, as it seems like government is making an investment in business, expecting to get some sort of return, although we almost never hear about it if/when such a return is ever realized.

quote:


Yup. Sadly, as soon as one starts to bend, the other will start to really hammer away rather than bend in return.


It's the usual political gamesmanship.



(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 9:38:55 PM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
the tax laws for self-employed/home based business in Canada are similar.. but have you seen all the "work at home" scams out there???? personally I think they are all scams, I personally would not waste my time with those.. but sure, people (if they have the time) can work part-time at avon or whatever in their time after their shitty 9-5 job.. but they have to find something that fits them (that's probably the hardest part) and it has to really make money (as the govt tax dept expects profits within a certain number of years)..No, its not easy.. its probably a lot easier & more profitable to just move to N Dakota and be a stripper! lol


Yeah, I would say 90%+ of those home business things that advertise - Avon, Mary Kay, "do data entry at home for $2000/week", etc are scams or pyramid schemes. I know people that do that stuff, and at best they end up with some free make-up or some pocket change from selling crappy energy drinks.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 9:48:26 PM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

Did you read any of the posted comments?

Now, for the rest of the story. The carpenters union has placed these signs all over Wichita Ks and I have stopped at every one I see to ask what they are disputing. They are complaining about the drywall contractors being non union and not having full medical benefits. HOWEVER, in 20 plus stops, every person holding the signs said they could not talk to me because they were temporary workers and just gave me a colored paper flyer from the union. Hows that for hypocrisy, hiring workers with no benefits to hold a sign complaining about other workers not having benefits!!!

I believe in fair labor practices but not every job on the planet needs to be controlled by a union.

(edit for spelling)


Ah, okay. So the union is unhappy that the company went around them and hired a bunch of drywall guys who are probably illegal immigrants (based on my personal experience) to work for cheap. Gotcha. I think that's a fair thing to picket about.

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/20/2014 9:51:35 PM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny
I don't know about Canada but there's no obligation to the government to turn a profit in the US. You can continuously lose money and still be in business as far as the IRS is concerned.


If your business hasn't made a profit in.... I think it's 5 years, the IRS will reclassify it as a hobby.

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Literally LOL'ed! Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109