angelikaJ -> RE: Pending Research (3/18/2014 5:01:54 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ghostraven it is often labeled under paraphilia. It is a gross injustice that I promise you is still part of college psychology. Since DSM-V only came out last June, the text books probably haven't had a chance to catch up yet. The following are some statements about the various paraphilias in the DSM-5. Although highly clinical in language, they show the APA’s intent to not demand treatment for healthy consenting adult sexual expression: “A paraphilia is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for having a paraphilic disorder, and a paraphilia by itself does not necessarily justify or require clinical intervention.” p. 686 “In contrast, if they declare no distress, exemplified by anxiety, obsessions, guilt or shame, about these paraphilic impulses, and are not hampered by them in pursuing other personal goals, they could be ascertained as having masochistic sexual interest but should not be diagnosed with a sexual masochism disorder.” p. 694 “Many individuals who self-identify as fetishist practitioners do not necessarily report clinical impairment in association with their fetish-associated behaviors. Such individuals could be considered as having a fetish but not fetishistic disorder.” p. 701 “Clinical assessment of distress or impairment, like clinical assessment of transvestic sexual arousal, is usually dependent on the individual’s self-report.” p. 703 https://ncsfreedom.org/press/blog/item/the-dsm-5-says-kink-is-ok.html It took me less than a minute to get a confirmation on the update. So still, shame on you for choosing a thesis topic that promotes inaccurate information.
|
|
|
|