Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Gun control in the U.K.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gun control in the U.K. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 2:28:45 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

. . . there are numerous brits that feel free to opine that we should have gun control in the US . . .


You obviously never absorbed Bama's quote from the SCROTUS when it was one of his taglines, Phydeaux - that one that said that free men own guns, whereas slaves don't. Brits are slaves who, lacking guns as they do, *never* 'feel free'.


Without some familiarity of the particular case before the SCOTUS, it's difficult to put that quote into a proper context. Though, since it was after all a case in the US, I don't think it was a slam on our UK brothers.

< Message edited by lovmuffin -- 3/21/2014 2:34:06 PM >


_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 2:38:35 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

. . . there are numerous brits that feel free to opine that we should have gun control in the US . . .


You obviously never absorbed Bama's quote from the SCROTUS when it was one of his taglines, Phydeaux - that one that said that free men own guns, whereas slaves don't. Brits are slaves who, lacking guns as they do, *never* 'feel free'.


Without some familiarity of the particular case before the SCOTUS, it's difficult to put that quote into a proper context. Though, since it was after all a case in the US, I don't think it was a slam on our UK brothers.

And he hasn't noticed that it was replaced by the Colt quote.
He has been paranoid about that quote for a couple of months
And you are right, it was intended to present a viewpoint, not to slam anyone.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 2:46:41 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

What the writer obviously missed is the fact that for most of us, we actually prefer our laws to that extreme with regard to firearms being in the hands of the general populace.

Exactly, and there ya go. American culture is very different. There is no reason to think, and less evidence, that most Americans would prefer your gun laws. The fact those laws work for you (accepting that for argument sake) is not an indication that they would work as well or at all in a culture very different from your own. So there remains nowhere to go except to debate the sins and virtues of American culture and our differing perceptions of it.

Good clean fun for the whole family.

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 3/21/2014 2:48:08 PM >

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 3:48:07 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

1) This is not a US only board
2) He's not making a recommendation, simply sharing the history.

I'm of the mind we can learn from the experiences of others.


And you certainly make a good point. I think he makes an implication though that gun control in the US would be a very slippery slope with one thing leading to the next until just about everything is either severely restricted or illegal. .

You know we've had gun control laws since the Constitution was ratified and that hasn't happened right? if they can indoctrinate the masses into believing the 2nd amendment pertains to the national Gaurd or some such shit then we'll start slipping down the road ata faster


It hasn't happened yet because that pesky 2nd amendment has managed to make gun control a much higher mountain to climb than In the UK. Though if they can indoctrinate the masses into believing the 2nd amendment pertains only to the National Gaurd or some other silly shit then we'll start slipping down that slope at a much faster pace.

Do not try and make my posts say things different than what I wrote. That is against the TOS. Simply admitting you were full of shit would have been the simplest response.


I must be missing something. I don't see how I put words in your mouth. I thought my post implied agreement with, UK type restrictions haven't "happened". I simply opined why that is with a bit more of my opinion for good measure.

Though if I admitted I was full of shit agreeing with you, wouldn't that make you full of shit too ? Sure we have gun control that hasn't yet expanded so severely as it has in the UK but if we just roll over and admit we're full of shit, it could happen.





_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 4:33:13 PM   
deathtothepixies


Posts: 683
Joined: 2/19/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


just like we were inflicted with Piers...


All those guns and you didn't manage to shoot Piers Morgan, not once!

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 4:44:38 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


just like we were inflicted with Piers...


All those guns and you didn't manage to shoot Piers Morgan, not once!

Which proves we are not as stupid and violent as he would have us believe.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to deathtothepixies)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 4:48:28 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

1) This is not a US only board
2) He's not making a recommendation, simply sharing the history.

I'm of the mind we can learn from the experiences of others.


And you certainly make a good point. I think he makes an implication though that gun control in the US would be a very slippery slope with one thing leading to the next until just about everything is either severely restricted or illegal. .

You know we've had gun control laws since the Constitution was ratified and that hasn't happened right? if they can indoctrinate the masses into believing the 2nd amendment pertains to the national Gaurd or some such shit then we'll start slipping down the road ata faster


It hasn't happened yet because that pesky 2nd amendment has managed to make gun control a much higher mountain to climb than In the UK. Though if they can indoctrinate the masses into believing the 2nd amendment pertains only to the National Gaurd or some other silly shit then we'll start slipping down that slope at a much faster pace.

Do not try and make my posts say things different than what I wrote. That is against the TOS. Simply admitting you were full of shit would have been the simplest response.


I must be missing something. I don't see how I put words in your mouth. I thought my post implied agreement with, UK type restrictions haven't "happened". I simply opined why that is with a bit more of my opinion for good measure.

Though if I admitted I was full of shit agreeing with you, wouldn't that make you full of shit too ? Sure we have gun control that hasn't yet expanded so severely as it has in the UK but if we just roll over and admit we're full of shit, it could happen.

You added text to my post as if I wrote it. That is expressly forbidden.

And you obviously couldn't weasel out of the bullshit you spread so you tried a red herring it didn't work. Do try to stick to the claim you made. In 1789 there were gun controls on this country so we should have rapidly lost all gun rights. That did not happen therefore you were...

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 4:50:19 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2010/tle558-20100221-07.html

Leads to an interesting history of a dissenting voice.


Are you fucking kidding me......... If you want the real history get a proper source.

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 4:51:09 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

1) This is not a US only board
2) He's not making a recommendation, simply sharing the history.

I'm of the mind we can learn from the experiences of others.


And you certainly make a good point. I think he makes an implication though that gun control in the US would be a very slippery slope with one thing leading to the next until just about everything is either severely restricted or illegal. .

You know we've had gun control laws since the Constitution was ratified and that hasn't happened right? if they can indoctrinate the masses into believing the 2nd amendment pertains to the national Gaurd or some such shit then we'll start slipping down the road ata faster


It hasn't happened yet because that pesky 2nd amendment has managed to make gun control a much higher mountain to climb than In the UK. Though if they can indoctrinate the masses into believing the 2nd amendment pertains only to the National Gaurd or some other silly shit then we'll start slipping down that slope at a much faster pace.

Do not try and make my posts say things different than what I wrote. That is against the TOS. Simply admitting you were full of shit would have been the simplest response.


I must be missing something. I don't see how I put words in your mouth. I thought my post implied agreement with, UK type restrictions haven't "happened". I simply opined why that is with a bit more of my opinion for good measure.

Though if I admitted I was full of shit agreeing with you, wouldn't that make you full of shit too ? Sure we have gun control that hasn't yet expanded so severely as it has in the UK but if we just roll over and admit we're full of shit, it could happen.

You added text to my post as if I wrote it. That is expressly forbidden.

And you obviously couldn't weasel out of the bullshit you spread so you tried a red herring it didn't work. Do try to stick to the claim you made. In 1789 there were gun controls on this country so we should have rapidly lost all gun rights. That did not happen therefore you were...

Total logic lapse.
Please document those controls.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 4:51:47 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
Not entirely relevant to the subject at hand, but isn't it encouraging to see someone become so successful on the back of so little talent? I mean, Piers isn't a cretin, but he's firmly in the mediocrity category, isn't he?

I've always been baffled as to whatever possessed the Septics that they took him on for one of their high profile TV programmes, but deeply grateful that they did.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to deathtothepixies)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 4:53:33 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Well, since there are numerous brits that feel free to opine that we should have gun control in the US, I think its only about fair that we should have a thread where we Yanks get to come and be rude and obnoxious and insist the brits should immediately institute a policy of mandatory gun ownership.


Yes yes, when our murder rates hit the level of yours, you have my permission to start posting like a prick.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 4:56:55 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Not entirely relevant to the subject at hand, but isn't it encouraging to see someone become so successful on the back of so little talent? I mean, Piers isn't a cretin, but he's firmly in the mediocrity category, isn't he?

I've always been baffled as to whatever possessed the Septics that they took him on for one of their high profile TV programmes, but deeply grateful that they did.


He obviously had a ready made target audience.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 4:57:43 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

just like we were inflicted with Piers...

All those guns and you didn't manage to shoot Piers Morgan, not once!

Okay so we fucked up there.

K.


(in reply to deathtothepixies)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 5:07:31 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

1) This is not a US only board
2) He's not making a recommendation, simply sharing the history.

I'm of the mind we can learn from the experiences of others.


And you certainly make a good point. I think he makes an implication though that gun control in the US would be a very slippery slope with one thing leading to the next until just about everything is either severely restricted or illegal. .

You know we've had gun control laws since the Constitution was ratified and that hasn't happened right? if they can indoctrinate the masses into believing the 2nd amendment pertains to the national Gaurd or some such shit then we'll start slipping down the road ata faster


It hasn't happened yet because that pesky 2nd amendment has managed to make gun control a much higher mountain to climb than In the UK. Though if they can indoctrinate the masses into believing the 2nd amendment pertains only to the National Gaurd or some other silly shit then we'll start slipping down that slope at a much faster pace.

Do not try and make my posts say things different than what I wrote. That is against the TOS. Simply admitting you were full of shit would have been the simplest response.


I must be missing something. I don't see how I put words in your mouth. I thought my post implied agreement with, UK type restrictions haven't "happened". I simply opined why that is with a bit more of my opinion for good measure.

Though if I admitted I was full of shit agreeing with you, wouldn't that make you full of shit too ? Sure we have gun control that hasn't yet expanded so severely as it has in the UK but if we just roll over and admit we're full of shit, it could happen.

You added text to my post as if I wrote it. That is expressly forbidden.

And you obviously couldn't weasel out of the bullshit you spread so you tried a red herring it didn't work. Do try to stick to the claim you made. In 1789 there were gun controls on this country so we should have rapidly lost all gun rights. That did not happen therefore you were...

Total logic lapse.
Please document those controls.

Disarmament of the whiskey rebels by act of Congress.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 5:08:57 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Well, since there are numerous brits that feel free to opine that we should have gun control in the US, I think its only about fair that we should have a thread where we Yanks get to come and be rude and obnoxious and insist the brits should immediately institute a policy of mandatory gun ownership.


Yes yes, when our murder rates hit the level of yours, you have my permission to start posting like a prick.



And when you brits have an empire that is more than a pimple on the rump of europe, you have my permission to talk about foreign policy.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 5:12:49 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
You added text to my post as if I wrote it. That is expressly forbidden.


OOPs, I sure as shit did. When I review the text before posting it I don't always look at what I'm quoting. I'm using a phone at the moment and I remember hitting something and lost what I was writing so I rewrote it. So thats where it went. My sincere apologies for that. Can it be fixed ? I hope you don't think I did it deliberately. When you responded to it I wasn't exactly sure what you were talking about. I thought you might have meant my opinion took your argument out of context.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 5:13:54 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Lmfao this is among the stupidest things you have ever posted. Ever wondered why you are speaking English ? Or using laws based on ours, including the bill of rights ?

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 5:30:53 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
FR

The man cited in the OP is just a fruitcake. We get them here in the UK, occasionally. Elsewhere, I've talked of gun-nuts being people who have a solution that's desperate to find a problem. The rare gun-nuts that we get here in the UK display that propensity probably more than do their American counterparts.

There just isn't a movement here in favour of guns: not amongst lefties, liberals or righties. Certainly, there's a strong current of opinion that has it that after WW1 the powers that be were scared of a Bolshevik uprising here in Britain, with lots of ex-conscripts returning from the trenches trained, armed and angry. But we'd historically never had anything like the gun culture of the USA and, after the slaughter of WW1 there was no great taste for any bloody revolution here.

If, if . . . any of the zillions of gun threads that had started here by Americans (er, have any at all been started by non-Americans?) had produced any sense that our society would be better off if it were armed, it might make a difference. But such threads have always done the opposite: they've only ever confirmed to us Brits that we don't want things to be the way they are in the USA.

I think that at bottom there's one very fundamental difference: In relation to the subject of guns, particularly, arguments around freedom/control of them by Americans seem to be conducted much more in terms of what is good and right for this or that given *individual* (a given homeowner who finds a youth in his daughter's bedroom, a young man wandering suspiciously in a well-to-do neighbourhood by a security guard, etc, etc) - and relate it back to him or her, the poster, himself or herself. Guns and gun control don't seem to be talked about in terms of American society as a whole; they seem to be talked about as a collection of disparate events involving individuals. Here, and I think across most of Europe, people tend to think of our respective societies in the round.

It boils down to this: I *would* prefer it if my girlfriend were able to walk home late at night without fear of attack. If she were to be carrying a knife or a can of CS gas (both illegal here - as indeed it is to carry anything that's meant as a weapon) - I'd be happier. But I wouldn't condone that as formal policy for all people, everywhere in the UK - because that would make things cumulatively worse for all of us. If anyone wants to comment, 'Ah, so your social view clashes with your individual view', I'd say, 'Go right ahead. Of course it does. The good of society just does, in multiple ways, demand a sacrifice for the individual.' I have conflicted feelings. That's inevitable if you're an individual who wants to live in a society that works well as a society.

Partly by design and partly by historical luck, we've ended up in a position here, in the UK, where people eschew guns. It's like a bit of decency has crept in through the back door and quietly settled in to stay, unnoticed. Most of us tend to think (if we compare ourselves to gun-owning societies at all - which we generally don't), 'We've fucked up a lot of things as a result of conscious and concerted policy over the centuries; this gun-free society just kind of evolved. But thank *God* for that'.

< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 3/21/2014 5:32:27 PM >


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 5:39:23 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Lmfao this is among the stupidest things you have ever posted. Ever wondered why you are speaking English ? Or using laws based on ours, including the bill of rights ?



Because we got to chose the bits we liked and leave the bullshit behind, of course. You weren't as fortunate.

This isn't to say that once upon a time Brits weren't an Empire. Of course they were. Merely that its namby pamby current citizens have relegated a once great empire to obsolescence, obscurity and irrelevance.

I mean you are irrelevant even to the EU...

< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 3/21/2014 5:40:34 PM >

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Gun control in the U.K. - 3/21/2014 5:49:07 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
Now Phydeaux, it's rather unfair of you to denigrate us Brits as namby pamby. With the best will in the world, not all of us Brits can be as muscularly masculine as yourself, what with your day-to-day pioneering of new territories and fighting injuns, and all.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gun control in the U.K. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109