RE: R.I.P. 4th Amendment (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


chatterbox24 -> RE: R.I.P. 4th Amendment (5/1/2014 6:00:58 AM)

Yes he was targeted. What if that call would have been valid though? What if he was a wack job who decided to shot people going down the road and he wasn't stopped and checked out. The whole thing was a hysterical and overdone. But its not uncommon for people to use a gun in a way to hurt others. Just because this police force in this area acted in such a way doesn't mean it would have been played out the same way somewhere else. Give the police some credit, there are some good police officers out there. If you don't want too, that's fine, but I will regardless of that circumstance. I am just looking at the coin from both sides.




ThirdWheelWanted -> RE: R.I.P. 4th Amendment (5/2/2014 1:49:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

Yes he was targeted. What if that call would have been valid though? What if he was a wack job who decided to shot people going down the road and he wasn't stopped and checked out. The whole thing was a hysterical and overdone. But its not uncommon for people to use a gun in a way to hurt others. Just because this police force in this area acted in such a way doesn't mean it would have been played out the same way somewhere else. Give the police some credit, there are some good police officers out there. If you don't want too, that's fine, but I will regardless of that circumstance. I am just looking at the coin from both sides.



I'm giving the police plenty of credit. As long as it's legal to do, and SCOTUS just said that it was, then they have every right to make use of anonymous calls. I may find it personally repugnant, but they're within the letter of the law. Since they were following the law, I'd even say that I don't think they over-reacted in your nephew's case. They had a "good" report that a man was brandishing a gun. As you said, what if he really was a wack job? Operating under that assumption, they were well within their rights to put him on the ground.

What you've been failing to see in all your arguments is that I'm not arguing against the police, I'm arguing over their use of anonymous tips. My guess as far as your nephew goes, is that someone knew he normally carried a gun, and went after him with that call. You did say that he works in an occupation that gets people pissed at him. He was just lucky that he wasn't carrying, otherwise he'd have been in a world of trouble. All because an anonymous source said so.

I can understand needing to be anonymous in certain situations, but for a run of the mill 911 call?




chatterbox24 -> RE: R.I.P. 4th Amendment (5/2/2014 3:10:30 PM)

He does have a job that could create enemies but he was also going through a divorce. I dont have contact with him often so I really dont know what has came out of it.if anything. So yes there is a downside to anonymous calls.




itsSIRtou -> RE: R.I.P. 4th Amendment (5/5/2014 7:50:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou

You ask any police department What is their biggest problem.... It's the resources to get the job done with.

1.) That is all those punkassmotherfuckers ever do is snivle about wanting more money.
All the crime stats say that helicoptors do not lower crime yet every cop dept "needs" one...same same "swat team"




Every time they turn around some city Council has to make budget cuts someplace.

2.) Perhaps if the politicians (chief of police is a politician) took a pay cut???


Rarely is the Police Department or the fire department off the table from cuts.

3.) The only cuts to fire and police I have seen here in california is sometimes they try to consolidate ineffeciencies but I have never seen them cut significantly.

Here in Minnesota, after over 30+ years, they finally got a tornado warning system that's actually automated
with the National Weather Service, the previous GOP federal administration had turned them down.....

4.) Vote the rascals out.

Almost any Police Department will tell you they can always use more men (and women ) to get the job done... And better updated equipment,....
And to me the police should have just as updated weapons as the military does. No Police Department should be outgunned by the bad guys....

5.) Just when have the "bad guys" outgunned the cops?
Should the cops have flame throwers,grenades and machine guns?




I find it completely and totally insane that John Q Public can go to a gun show and get more firepower in three days than most police departments have or can get budget approval to buy in years.

6.) Any validation for this idiotic nonsense?

There are people who raise private money just so that police dogs can have body armor!! There's no reason for that!!! when police dogs are just as valuable assets to the of to a department
as any other member of the team.

7.) Perhaps the p/o might buy a few of those instead of a new helicoptor or a limo and driver for the chier?

Training costs money too...... in this case, training in how to deal with a public that's becoming more diverse every year

8.) Any validation that our society is becoming more diverse rather than less?






NOTE: thompsonx responses numbered for ease of reference..


1.) I would be interested to see where you get those "crime stats".... Especially since helicopters are not for crime deterrence, but as a tool to help find the bad guys and/or victims or to help airlift victims of accidents.

2.) Perhaps if we just got rid of tax cuts for the wealthy (since they are not really creating jobs with the tax cut money anyway.) And since you're in the pay cut mood, How about cutting CEO pay since the "wealthy poor income gap" keeps getting bigger every year? And before you ask? Google "wealthy poor income gap" and take your pick of media outlets that all say it's getting bigger. Even from the conservatives.

3.) Then really, seriously, I think you're not paying enough attention to your local municipal and state budget discussions. ... Other than that really to me the how and whys doesn't matter to me - budget cuts are budget cuts.

4.) This is probably going to be the one thing I will completely agree with you about, - the current GOP and its tea party need to go away.

5.) The simple fact that you can actually acknowledge that flamethrowers, grenades and machine guns are available to the general public in the first place, pretty well acknowledges you know what most Police Department's don't have.... And really NOBODY should have the other than United States military.

6.) I'm going to assume that you're just joking. You really can't be that clueless or downright stupid. Maybe you should remember that most of the mass shooters last few years bought their weapons and ammo legally at such shows? John Q public can indeed go to a major metropolitan area gun show and buy some of the most modern weapons made. the most modern weapons. The Most modern weapons police departments have (their swat teams may have better) are older M-16s.

7.) And maybe you should really get past saying something just to have something to say. See #2.

8.) Let's try looking at the demographics of the last two presidential elections shall we? Or just the last two census collections. Open your eyes man. Or, crawled off of that mountain top You been living on the last 50 years. whites are still not the majority they once were. Getting less so every year. Get over it.




thompsonx -> RE: R.I.P. 4th Amendment (5/5/2014 9:05:42 AM)



1.) I would be interested to see where you get those "crime stats"....

Google could be your friend here.

Especially since helicopters are not for crime deterrence,

That would be your ignorant unsubstantiated opinion.

but as a tool to help find the bad guys and/or victims or to help airlift victims of accidents.

Police helicopters do not airlift accident victims

2.) Perhaps if we just got rid of tax cuts for the wealthy

I have no problem with that.

(since they are not really creating jobs with the tax cut money anyway.) And since you're in the pay cut mood, How about cutting CEO pay since the "wealthy poor income gap" keeps getting bigger every year? And before you ask? Google "wealthy poor income gap" and take your pick of media outlets that all say it's getting bigger. Even from the conservatives.

I am quite aware of the "wealthy poor income gap.

3.) Then really, seriously, I think you're not paying enough attention to your local municipal and state budget discussions. ... Other than that really to me the how and whys doesn't matter to me - budget cuts are budget cuts.

I think there is a significant difference between taking the chaufer driven limo and a quarter million a year pay check from the chief and cutting a patrolmans pay by half.

4.) This is probably going to be the one thing I will completely agree with you about, - the current GOP and its tea party need to go away.

5.) The simple fact that you can actually acknowledge that flamethrowers, grenades and machine guns are available to the general public in the first place, pretty well acknowledges you know what most Police Department's don't have.... And really NOBODY should have the other than United States military.

Cops have machine guns and grenades( I have never seen fragmentation grenades in the armory but plenty of tear gas,smoke and concussion"flash bang"grenades.

6.) I'm going to assume that you're just joking.


That would be a faulty assumption.

You really can't be that clueless or downright stupid. Maybe you should remember that most of the mass shooters last few years bought their weapons and ammo legally at such shows?


What has that got to do with anything?

John Q public can indeed go to a major metropolitan area gun show and buy some of the most modern weapons made.

And they can also buy antique black powder stuff also...what is your point?

the most modern weapons. The Most modern weapons police departments have (their swat teams may have better) are older M-16s.

Isn't that what the army uses? What, in your opinion ,would be a better weapon?



7.) And maybe you should really get past saying something just to have something to say. See #2.


So far you have failed to refute anything I have posted so clearly I have asked questions that you are incapable of answering.

8.) Let's try looking at the demographics of the last two presidential elections shall we? Or just the last two census collections. Open your eyes man. Or, crawled off of that mountain top You been living on the last 50 years. whites are still not the majority they once were. Getting less so every year. Get over it.

Whites comprise @49 % of the u.s.,latinos @22%,Blacks @13%asians,pacific islanders and native americans @15%.
Your claim that our population is becoming more diverse fails to take into consideration that anti mesigination laws are no longer valid thus more mesigination and less diversity due to the melting pot. Look at the history of "race riots" in the u.s. and you will notice that they have gone down not up.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.100586E-02