RE: DOMMES (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


imtempting -> RE: DOMMES (5/1/2014 5:39:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: imtempting

That's exactly why I'm an expert because I've seen it from all sides not just your one dimensional side.

Indeed. You're the only one who speaks the "truth" so you're the "expert". Unfortunately, your expertise seems to only center around misogyny.



Thank you for finally seeing how superior I am. I do not hate women nor dommes. I just like to bring dommes down to earth and get them off their high almighty horse. They are, after all equal until everything have been discussed. Btw, that's on topic with what the OP wanted.


I see your expertise is in only in personal attacks, the same with your friend.





FieryOpal -> RE: DOMMES (5/1/2014 6:02:20 PM)

~FR~ Hey stef, I think the butthurt is still strong with this one.

quote:

ORIGINAL: imtempting

Thank you for finally seeing how superior I am.


But onto matters of actual import....

quote:

ORIGINAL: thezeppo

Yes, I meant form letters. I get called 'slut' an awful lot by people I don't know as well, I must have developed a reputation from somewhere ;)


You're a good-looking guy, you have a nice profile--you should get snatched up in no time. No bad reputation that I know of; sleazebags are everywhere who get off on using "slut" and "ho" slurs indiscriminately.

(Your secret's safe with us, by the way. [;)] )




stef -> RE: DOMMES (5/1/2014 9:03:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

~FR~ Hey stef, I think the butthurt is still strong with this one.

The butthurt is all there is with that one. I stand corrected though, apparently there are two things he is an "expert" of.




imtempting -> RE: DOMMES (5/1/2014 9:32:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

~FR~ Hey stef, I think the butthurt is still strong with this one.

The butthurt is all there is with that one. I stand corrected though, apparently there are two things he is an "expert" of.


None at all, you finally realized I'm superior, I agreed.

Do either of you two think you can get back on topic?
Sorry moderator3, I know I'm not following the rules but nor are they.




FieryOpal -> RE: DOMMES (5/1/2014 9:50:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: imtempting

None at all, you finally realized I'm superior, I agreed.
<snip>

Some things don't need to be repeated for they stand the test of time:
http://www.collarchat.com/m_4685886/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4685944

Also this: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4683914




imtempting -> RE: DOMMES (5/1/2014 9:54:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal


quote:

ORIGINAL: imtempting

None at all, you finally realized I'm superior, I agreed.
<snip>

Some things don't need to be repeated for they stand the test of time:
http://www.collarchat.com/m_4685886/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4685944

Also this: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4683914


Your point being?

And the first post reflects the topic great, thank you for helping to prove my case.

. You do know what a topic is don't you or you just enjoy hijacking threads to do personal attacks??




Moderator3 -> RE: DOMMES (5/1/2014 10:43:16 PM)

I can see people are going to make me be the mean M3. I really don't like to be mean, but after going through thread after thread, I may have to be. I could save myself a lot of work here and I am sure you all know what I mean.

How many times did I say mean? It could be fate or I am tired. Care to play? [;)]

Please take it back a notch.




imtempting -> RE: DOMMES (5/1/2014 11:29:19 PM)

You said it 3 times but if you include the question about how many times you said it, then it's 4.




Moderator3 -> RE: DOMMES (5/1/2014 11:30:00 PM)

[:D]




FieryOpal -> RE: DOMMES (5/1/2014 11:34:18 PM)

OP, needingrelease50, you haven't returned to this thread yet, so I'll direct my question to thezeppo. Have you ever gotten a message along these lines? Btw, I found this in my inbox from a male sub. [sm=domme.gif]

[image]local://upfiles/1774587/41BD80FC520F474B85680281AED5C1B1.jpg[/image]




DarkSteven -> RE: DOMMES (5/2/2014 2:19:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NiceButMeanGirl

Hi here needingrelease50.

I notice that you're profile is conveniently hidden so no one can check you out.


OP, let me explain a bit more of what NBMG was hinting at.

Having a blank profile will not run off any financial Dommes. But it will run off lifestyle Dommes because:

1. A hidden profile indicates a greater possibility that you are cheating on someone.
2. A hidden profile means much more work in determining if someone is compatible.
3. A hidden profile means that you are controlling the information, and a Domme would prefer to not have you be in control.




FieryOpal -> RE: DOMMES (5/2/2014 3:36:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

OP, let me explain a bit more of what NBMG was hinting at.

Having a blank profile will not run off any financial Dommes. But it will run off lifestyle Dommes because:

1. A hidden profile indicates a greater possibility that you are cheating on someone.
2. A hidden profile means much more work in determining if someone is compatible.
3. A hidden profile means that you are controlling the information, and a Domme would prefer to not have you be in control.

Right on the money, DarkSteven. A hidden profile is ALWAYS suspect, and I won't respond to anyone with one.

OP has a relatively new account, but in 6 weeks' time, he should have fleshed out that sucker. Since this account was not just 1-2 days old, I did not consider it a sock puppet solely for the purpose of posting this thread.
As soon as NBMG mentioned it, I thought he would have unhidden his profile within 24 hours, definitely by now. Ironic to come here and complain about others playing games.
There seem to be a lot of sock puppets and trolls abounding lately. Or perhaps that's how it's been on the fora on & off in spurts over the years? No matter.
(I've been waiting to use this pic--hehehe.... Thank you, ExiledTyrant for posting it previously elsewhere. [:D] )

[image]local://upfiles/1774587/E5353A765E6A4230AE05969E67F9D167.jpg[/image]




thezeppo -> RE: DOMMES (5/2/2014 11:03:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

OP, needingrelease50, you haven't returned to this thread yet, so I'll direct my question to thezeppo. Have you ever gotten a message along these lines? Btw, I found this in my inbox from a male sub. [sm=domme.gif]

[image]local://upfiles/1774587/41BD80FC520F474B85680281AED5C1B1.jpg[/image]


Sounds like a sub with a very clear idea of what he wanted his domme to do to him. My unsolicited messages tend more towards the 'present yourself on webcam for inspection, worm' variety.




LadyLucan -> RE: DOMMES (5/2/2014 12:27:22 PM)

Syntax is everything - 'present your worm for inspection on webcam' yields entirely different results.

Doesn't it? [:D]




NiceButMeanGirl -> RE: DOMMES (5/2/2014 2:26:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven


quote:

ORIGINAL: NiceButMeanGirl

Hi here needingrelease50.

I notice that you're profile is conveniently hidden so no one can check you out.


OP, let me explain a bit more of what NBMG was hinting at.

Having a blank profile will not run off any financial Dommes. But it will run off lifestyle Dommes because:

1. A hidden profile indicates a greater possibility that you are cheating on someone.
2. A hidden profile means much more work in determining if someone is compatible.
3. A hidden profile means that you are controlling the information, and a Domme would prefer to not have you be in control.

Exactly!!

NBMG




mnottertail -> RE: DOMMES (5/2/2014 2:29:19 PM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anLfoy2XsFw

Get it, OP?




FieryOpal -> RE: DOMMES (5/2/2014 6:45:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thezeppo

My unsolicited messages tend more towards the 'present yourself on webcam for inspection, worm' variety.

I don't know which is worse, that or the "Kneel, bitch" line which female subs get spammed with.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyLucan

Syntax is everything - 'present your worm for inspection on webcam' yields entirely different results.

Doesn't it? [:D]

You crack me up... [sm=biggrin.gif]

... although one would hope it was less a worm than a one-eyed snake. [8D]




egern -> RE: DOMMES (5/3/2014 3:25:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: needingrelease50

Is it just me or are the majority of so called Dommes on this site just playing games? How can anyone expect someone to truly submit after only 2 emails back and forth? And what is up with this financial domination? Are their really fools that desire this? Does a true Domme block you just because you call them out for how they are acting and talking to a perfect stranger? Please help me understand this.


If you have been here for so long, you will know that there is a number of pro dommes here, and also that dommes can be every bit as stupid as doms.




thezeppo -> RE: DOMMES (5/3/2014 1:35:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyLucan

Syntax is everything - 'present your worm for inspection on webcam' yields entirely different results.

Doesn't it? [:D]


Ha, I will have to get back to you on that one. It's not a message I've ever sent.




dink22 -> RE: DOMMES (5/9/2014 4:21:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: needingrelease50

Is it just me or are the majority of so called Dommes on this site just playing games? How can anyone expect someone to truly submit after only 2 emails back and forth? And what is up with this financial domination? Are their really fools that desire this? Does a true Domme block you just because you call them out for how they are acting and talking to a perfect stranger? Please help me understand this.


It really depends on what you're looking for. If you want a sexual relationship, it's not hard to find here but you'll probably have to pay money for it. On the other hand, if you're looking for something more along the lines of a romantic, live-in relationship, I wouldn't waste too much time here. Even if it really is someone looking for a lifetime relationship, so many of the "dommes" have extremely impractical ideas.

For example, this whole, "It's not about you or your needs., it's about me. I couldn't care less about what you want" (and that's not uncommon here) is simply not a practical basis for a meaningful relationship. And "dommes" who think they're going to find something deep or permanent with that mentality are kidding themselves. That's not how a relationship works. There has to be mutual respect on both sides. Of course that certainly includes you. If you both try to have good communication and are willing to make some sacrifices, it can happen but, again, you have to have someone who lives in the real world. I had such a relationship for 6 years from 1988 - 1994. We would probably still be together but I got a great job offer and her mother got sick and she felt she had to move back to her hometown to take care of her (I even offered to let her mom move in with us but her mom didn't want to leave where she was.

I had a bunch of false starts in the years that followed, mainly because I tried to find dommes on BDSM sites, but seven months ago I finally met someone sane who had a real job. We've moved in together and it just gets more thrilling all the time.

As far as expecting you to "truly submit" after 2 e-mails, chances are it was just another person (sometimes a guy posing as a female) trying to exploit submissive males for money. If you read the profiles, these types seem to be the most common:

PRO DOMMES. They want money. Some don't call themselves pro dommes, and don't even mention money. But their profiles tell you what sort of "services" they offer.

FINANCIAL DOMMES. They want money. They're probably not real dommes anyway (a few might be). That's where you get the guys posing as women. They'll tell you how they're going to "rape your wallet" and other cliches because they've got to be the most unoriginal thinkers in the world and not very bright on the whole.

SCAM DOMMES. They want money. They'll write profiles saying they're "looking for a serious LTR with a sub/slave." They'll engage you in a few e-mails then find some reason to ask for money. Often it's "travel expenses" to come and meet you. Another scam is they'll tell you they just want you to send them 150 dollars because they're tired of men agreeing to meet and then never showing up. I don't know how guys fall for this. I guess they really WANT to believe something.

GOLD DIGGER DOMMES. They want money. These are women who have heard that submissive men tend to be successful and powerful in real life, and they hope that by being "dominant" they're going to meet some millionaire.

PHONY DOMMES. They don't want money, but they also don't really want to meet you. There are several different types:

The older woman who posts pictures of herself that are 25 years old. She's getting older (and probably heavier) and wonders how submissive men would react to her if she was still in her early 20s. She's not actually serious about meeting anyone.

The younger woman who is doing what basically amounts to research. She wants to understand the scene without actually having to be part of it. She has all the tired cliches (e.g. "lick my boots slave"). She'll converse, but fall off the map after 3 or 4 e-mails.

Game players. These are rather sick women who like getting a guy all excited and then shutting him off cold to see him squirm and suffer and go ape shit trying to get things going again.

Ugly dommes. Not all of these are "phony," but they're typically grossly overweight and unattractive and trying to be a "domme" to find someone.

Are their genuine lifestyle dommes here? There are, not many, but there are. The problem is most of them really aren't "looking" for someone. A decent looking lifestyle domme doesn't really need to "look" at all. The secondary problem is that saying you're a "lifestyle" domme gets all of the above-mentioned much more attention. So they make that claim all the time even though it isn't true. That's nothing new. Back in the 1980s (and probably even before that) in those seedy tabloids that the prostitutes advertise in (e.g. Al Goldstein's "SCREW") nearly all the pro dommes mentioned they were also lifestyle dommes and we're looking for a permanent slave. That helped drum up business.

Hope that's not too depressing to hear. Here's the good news. Many normal women (trust me, wayyy more than you'd think) are secret closet dommes. I wish I'd known this when I was younger. The problem is figuring out how to attract them in the first place and how to bring out that inner dominatrix. They are genuinely interested in "experimenting with a sub guy, but they think they're not supposed to be.

That's another thread all together.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875