joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SadistDave
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:
ORIGINAL: SadistDave
If this had happened under a Republican President, the libs here would be apoplectic and foaming at the mouth to get rid of the administration. However, some folks feel the need to defend their uber-liberalism by giving this administration a pass simply because the President is a left-of-Lenin Democrat.
It happened a number of times under Bush and with majority of repubs in both houses, not a peep. This shit on Benghazi is nothing but partisan tripe and you could cut the hypocrisy with a knife. The CIA has always lied yet truly perfected their lying to the American people under w.
What a load of horseshit. If it were "partisan tripe" then Odumbass and company would not be spending so much time trying to make it go away. This has been dragging on for a year and a half. If it was as simple as some kind of right-wing conspiracy, the Liar-in-Chief could have simply dealt with it a year ago. Unfortunately his narrative doesn't gel with reality. That is becoming more clear daily daily.
The only time the President and Democrats spend on this 'story', is when conservatives, libertarians, Republicans, and Tea Party bring this topic up. Unlike the President and Democrats, the others mentioned in the previous sentence, do so for petty political gain; NOT to right the wrongs, bring actual justice, or show the information in a clearly honest and fair manner. The only people that cant understand this, are the same ones that are conservative, libertarian, Republican, and/or Tea Party.
The issue was dealt with a year ago. Its actually has been the ring-wing conspiracies on numerous conservative oriented websites that have kept the issue alive. Because they are all afraid of Mrs. Clinton. That 2016 is her year, and there's not one thing anyone on the right can do about it. If they are being honest about things....
quote:
ORIGINAL: SadistDave
If there was an ounce of truth to the bullshit being slung by the White House, there would be ample evidence to lay the issue to rest by simply being transparent about the incident. All they had to do was release the relevant documents to Congress and have everyone involved give testimony. Hell; the White House should welcome the opportunity to punk Republicans by presenting actual evidence that backs up their story. Instead, the administration sends redacted e-mails, keeps people from testifying in front of Congress, continues to lie about the motives of the attackers, lies about the attack, and sends out their talking heads to spew one untruth after another. They get away with it because all the little Obama fanboys working at NPbaRf, MSPMS and ABSheeple will believe anything that has the official ThinkProgress seal of approval.
I seem to recall that the military, spy agencies and even the White House is entitled to keep some things a secret. And that members of Congress regularly meet with all of these groups behind closed doors to make sure everything remains above board and honest. Imagine if everything that happen with Snowden took place during President G. W. Bush's administration? An administration well known to keep just about everything, behind closed doors, off the record, and in secret. Like those 'massive stockpiles' of WMDs that were in Iraq, right?
Objectively, the White House was not fully aware of the events immediately after they took place. That would take some careful study, interviews and research to understand as much of the full story as possible. If what happen with Benghazi is so bad, why did we not hear a peep from conservatives, libertarians, Republicans, and Tea Party in the moments and/or months after 9/11/01? Oh that's right, the President was a Republican.....
quote:
ORIGINAL: SadistDave
Only a complete fucking moron would believe the White House has been forthcoming enough to make the story they're pushing sound even remotely credible.
Same could be said of those WMDs in Iraq. How many of our soldiers died disproving that falsehood? How many were wounded? 4,000+ and 32,500+ respectfully. How much money did we pour into that 'investigation'? $4 Trillion of borrowed money....
You blame President Obama for four Americans dying in Benghazi in a rather fanatical manner. Yet give a complete pass to President G. W. Bush when thousands as many Americans died in Iraq. So the question is.....how many Americans have to die before its not considered .....WRONG?
I know, you'll dodge the answer, or fake not having seen it. its a question I ask time and again, and not one person attacking the President on Benghazi can answer it in all honesty?
quote:
ORIGINAL: SadistDave
As for Bush; you can't swing a dead cat in these forums without hitting some idiot accusing Bush of war crimes or crimes against humanity. Here we are in Ofailures second term and you libs are still pushing the W. war crimes narrative. Citations are abundantly served up as evidence of his alleged guilt. That means that the media "peeped" quite a lot about shit that Bush did or didn't do.
The old 'swinging a dead rat' argument....
How many threads have come up in the last year calling on former President G. W. Bush to be tried for war crimes, and/or crimes against humanity? How many threads have started with Benghazi as the central topic? Once in the first question, and fifty-two in the second question. Maybe you should re-examine your bullshit arguments....
quote:
ORIGINAL: SadistDave
It looks like you're filled to the brim with pathetic bullshit excuses, just like your hero Barry-O...
You have no clue what your babbling about here....
|
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - .gif){kind=avatar}
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread