Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 1:37:57 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
somebody ordered them to stand down? what you heard that on nutsacker news? you know who the somebody is? not according to any testimony on the record between the convict issa and the joint chiefs.

maybe you can get this credible citation along with a copy of Obamas birth certificate from Kenya.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 1:38:23 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

My dying fuckin ass. They were testifying at a house hearing for the convict Issa. That asswipe aint gonna cut it.


Oh, I'm willing to bet you're wrong.

What the white house is dying to avoid is proving how incompetent this white house is.

AMPLE warning that the consulate was going to be attacked - and they did nothing.
Routine oversight (like making sure the consulate was up to security standards) they waived.

The president hasn't supplied the minutes from the situation room; nor clintons briefings. Nor the deliberations of the terrorism task force, nor the joint chiefs of staff.

But the real interesting question is where Obama was.

And I suspect the answer is that he wasn't in the situation room while the attack was going on.
I suspect the answer is that he was on his way to las vegas for a fundraiser.

The steady drip drip drip. will continue



We are aware that the nutsackers are always ready to believe in conspiracies. But a airport bathroom of nutsackers intimating that the entire hierarchy of the military was unaware and shirking their lifelong jobs is just a little too fuckin imbecilic.

They have radar, intelligence, and saran wrap, they know whats going on at anytime or anywhere.




Bullshit! The military was going to do the right thing and were making preparations to try to rescue the compound. "Somebody" ordered them to stand down! Why? Who knew how long the attack was going to go on? Hours or even days? You don't want to know who the miserable scumbag was who ordered the military to stand down and not attempt a rescue, knowing that Americans would most likely die? You really CAN'T go along with stonewalling something like this!


Nobody ordered anyone to stand down. That is all fever dream. The relief force from Tripoli arrived, Doherty was one of them. After the mortar attack they evacuated to the airport and the attack was over because there was no one left to attack. That was when the guys in Rota and Croatia stopped getting ready.

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 1:46:24 PM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline
Lets see now, who has the authority to order a senior General to order his command to stand down? Can't be too many people with that much horsepower. And that silly explanation, "you don't send men in harms way." Jesus Christ! The military does that EVERY DAY! Rumor has it that war is dangerous!

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 1:59:34 PM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

My dying fuckin ass. They were testifying at a house hearing for the convict Issa. That asswipe aint gonna cut it.


Oh, I'm willing to bet you're wrong.

What the white house is dying to avoid is proving how incompetent this white house is.

AMPLE warning that the consulate was going to be attacked - and they did nothing.
Routine oversight (like making sure the consulate was up to security standards) they waived.

The president hasn't supplied the minutes from the situation room; nor clintons briefings. Nor the deliberations of the terrorism task force, nor the joint chiefs of staff.

But the real interesting question is where Obama was.

And I suspect the answer is that he wasn't in the situation room while the attack was going on.
I suspect the answer is that he was on his way to las vegas for a fundraiser.

The steady drip drip drip. will continue



We are aware that the nutsackers are always ready to believe in conspiracies. But a airport bathroom of nutsackers intimating that the entire hierarchy of the military was unaware and shirking their lifelong jobs is just a little too fuckin imbecilic.

They have radar, intelligence, and saran wrap, they know whats going on at anytime or anywhere.




Bullshit! The military was going to do the right thing and were making preparations to try to rescue the compound. "Somebody" ordered them to stand down! Why? Who knew how long the attack was going to go on? Hours or even days? You don't want to know who the miserable scumbag was who ordered the military to stand down and not attempt a rescue, knowing that Americans would most likely die? You really CAN'T go along with stonewalling something like this!


Nobody ordered anyone to stand down. That is all fever dream. The relief force from Tripoli arrived, Doherty was one of them. After the mortar attack they evacuated to the airport and the attack was over because there was no one left to attack. That was when the guys in Rota and Croatia stopped getting ready.


If what you say is true, why do the dead American's parents (who probably know a little bit more about this than you,) go on TV and complain about the lack of rescue attempt for their children? And the retired Lt Colonel goes on saying even if you know there is not a chance in hell, you stilll TRY.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 2:39:18 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion

Lets see now, who has the authority to order a senior General to order his command to stand down? Can't be too many people with that much horsepower. And that silly explanation, "you don't send men in harms way." Jesus Christ! The military does that EVERY DAY! Rumor has it that war is dangerous!



So frenetic hallucination and slobbering asswipe like the Kenyan conspiracy of yore.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 4:01:18 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

My dying fuckin ass. They were testifying at a house hearing for the convict Issa. That asswipe aint gonna cut it.


Oh, I'm willing to bet you're wrong.

What the white house is dying to avoid is proving how incompetent this white house is.

AMPLE warning that the consulate was going to be attacked - and they did nothing.
Routine oversight (like making sure the consulate was up to security standards) they waived.

The president hasn't supplied the minutes from the situation room; nor clintons briefings. Nor the deliberations of the terrorism task force, nor the joint chiefs of staff.

But the real interesting question is where Obama was.

And I suspect the answer is that he wasn't in the situation room while the attack was going on.
I suspect the answer is that he was on his way to las vegas for a fundraiser.

The steady drip drip drip. will continue



We are aware that the nutsackers are always ready to believe in conspiracies. But a airport bathroom of nutsackers intimating that the entire hierarchy of the military was unaware and shirking their lifelong jobs is just a little too fuckin imbecilic.

They have radar, intelligence, and saran wrap, they know whats going on at anytime or anywhere.




Bullshit! The military was going to do the right thing and were making preparations to try to rescue the compound. "Somebody" ordered them to stand down! Why? Who knew how long the attack was going to go on? Hours or even days? You don't want to know who the miserable scumbag was who ordered the military to stand down and not attempt a rescue, knowing that Americans would most likely die? You really CAN'T go along with stonewalling something like this!


Nobody ordered anyone to stand down. That is all fever dream. The relief force from Tripoli arrived, Doherty was one of them. After the mortar attack they evacuated to the airport and the attack was over because there was no one left to attack. That was when the guys in Rota and Croatia stopped getting ready.


If what you say is true, why do the dead American's parents (who probably know a little bit more about this than you,) go on TV and complain about the lack of rescue attempt for their children? And the retired Lt Colonel goes on saying even if you know there is not a chance in hell, you stilll TRY.


Because they've been fed bullshit by Fox?

The Pentagon timeline
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/09/world/africa/libya-benghazi-timeline/

The guys in Rota and Croatia started getting ready to deploy after 2:39 am. It is physically impossible that either force could have arrived in Benghazi by 5:15 when the mortar attack killed Doherty and Woods. There was no order to stand down. That is simply made up nonsense. We sent the guys who could get there in time, Doherty was one of them. When the situation became untenable they evacuated to the airport and flew out. At that point there was no further need and the special forces guys that had been prepping stood down.

No matter how badly the right wing wants to make this more than what it was, it wasn't. It was a terrible tragedy. The Ambassador knew Benghazi was chaotic and dangerous. He chose to go there anyway. If you look into his career you will see that is how he operated.

We have small diplomatic teams scattered all over the world there is simply no way we can make sure all of them are 100% safe even in places like Libya. The Diplomatic Corps know the risks and choose to take those risks in order to serve their country. It dishonors Ambassador Stevens and the rest of the Diplomatic Corps to try and use this tragedy for political advantage.

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 7:37:05 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2346
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux



So, the email trove continues from the FOI request...

Ben Rhodes

The email lists the following two goals, among others:

"To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy."

Ben Rhodes, you know Deputy National Security Adviser, brother to the president of CBS news... The only problem of course is .. it was a blatant failure of policy. And so the last peg of what I alleged at the start of this whole mess comes home. As predicted, the obama administration knowingly lied in an attempt to avoid the obvious conclusions.

This was AFTER they had been briefed by the missions deputy chief of staff that there was no protest; after having seen the actual attack.

Flat. out. lie.



OMG! An incumbent President's administration tried to spin the facts for a week, a few months prior to an election! Stop the presses! Everyone knew they were spinning. One week later, the truth came out. The point is, relative to the massive lies and disastrous foreign policy of the previous administration, to be lightly spun for a week is a yawn.

Who the f**k on this earth, that is not a right-wing ideologue gives a sh*t?????


I like this "email trove"! LOL The "smoking gun".... Evidence of what? Obama trying to win an election? WOW!


What a waste of time and my tax money. If it were not for gerrymandering, we would have a Democratic House. Unfortunately, Nancy Pelosi would be speaker, but anything is better than this nonsense.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 9:46:56 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

My dying fuckin ass. They were testifying at a house hearing for the convict Issa. That asswipe aint gonna cut it.


Oh, I'm willing to bet you're wrong.

What the white house is dying to avoid is proving how incompetent this white house is.

AMPLE warning that the consulate was going to be attacked - and they did nothing.
Routine oversight (like making sure the consulate was up to security standards) they waived.

The president hasn't supplied the minutes from the situation room; nor clintons briefings. Nor the deliberations of the terrorism task force, nor the joint chiefs of staff.

But the real interesting question is where Obama was.

And I suspect the answer is that he wasn't in the situation room while the attack was going on.
I suspect the answer is that he was on his way to las vegas for a fundraiser.

The steady drip drip drip. will continue



We are aware that the nutsackers are always ready to believe in conspiracies. But a airport bathroom of nutsackers intimating that the entire hierarchy of the military was unaware and shirking their lifelong jobs is just a little too fuckin imbecilic.

They have radar, intelligence, and saran wrap, they know whats going on at anytime or anywhere.




Bullshit! The military was going to do the right thing and were making preparations to try to rescue the compound. "Somebody" ordered them to stand down! Why? Who knew how long the attack was going to go on? Hours or even days? You don't want to know who the miserable scumbag was who ordered the military to stand down and not attempt a rescue, knowing that Americans would most likely die? You really CAN'T go along with stonewalling something like this!


Nobody ordered anyone to stand down. That is all fever dream. The relief force from Tripoli arrived, Doherty was one of them. After the mortar attack they evacuated to the airport and the attack was over because there was no one left to attack. That was when the guys in Rota and Croatia stopped getting ready.


If what you say is true, why do the dead American's parents (who probably know a little bit more about this than you,) go on TV and complain about the lack of rescue attempt for their children? And the retired Lt Colonel goes on saying even if you know there is not a chance in hell, you stilll TRY.


Because they've been fed bullshit by Fox?

The Pentagon timeline
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/09/world/africa/libya-benghazi-timeline/

The guys in Rota and Croatia started getting ready to deploy after 2:39 am. It is physically impossible that either force could have arrived in Benghazi by 5:15 when the mortar attack killed Doherty and Woods. There was no order to stand down. That is simply made up nonsense. We sent the guys who could get there in time, Doherty was one of them. When the situation became untenable they evacuated to the airport and flew out. At that point there was no further need and the special forces guys that had been prepping stood down.

No matter how badly the right wing wants to make this more than what it was, it wasn't. It was a terrible tragedy. The Ambassador knew Benghazi was chaotic and dangerous. He chose to go there anyway. If you look into his career you will see that is how he operated.

We have small diplomatic teams scattered all over the world there is simply no way we can make sure all of them are 100% safe even in places like Libya. The Diplomatic Corps know the risks and choose to take those risks in order to serve their country. It dishonors Ambassador Stevens and the rest of the Diplomatic Corps to try and use this tragedy for political advantage.



Bullshit.

There were 16 (or 17) people at the CIA compound. The AP reported:

Westmoreland said the CIA security contractors loaded into two vehicles, with weapons ready, the moment they heard the radio call for help from the diplomatic building. Some wanted to rush to the U.S. compound roughly a mile away, and their agitation grew as they heard increasing panic when the diplomats reported the militants were setting the compound on fire.

The CIA team leader and the CIA chief at the Benghazi annex told committee members that they were trying to gather Libyan allies and intelligence before racing into the fray, worried that they might be sending their security team into an ambush with little or no backup.

At least one of those security contractors, a former U.S. Army Ranger, was told to “wait” at least twice, and he argued with his security team leader, according to his testimony, related by Westmoreland. Westmoreland declined to share the names of the officers who testified because they are still CIA employees


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/now-cia-contradicts-govt-benghazi-account/#pLqJ3Tu2Yk5aDvSF.99


More importantly Gregory Hicks testified:

The Obama administration denied Special Forces commandos permission to board a military flight to help defend the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi while it was under attack, according to State Department career officer Gregory Hicks, a former second-in-command in the North African country.

Recalling the words of a Lt. Col. Gibson, then the military commander at Special Operations Command Africa (SOCAFRICA), Hicks said during a House Oversight Committee hearing Wednesday that Gibson said the armed forces should have made the decision about its own soldiers.

'This is the first time in my career,' Gibson said, according to Hicks. 'that a diplomat has more balls than somebody in the military.'

Gregory Hicks, former State Department deputy chief of mission in Libya, recalled the words of a Special Operations commander who said he was 'embarrassed' the have to order commandos to stand down instead of flying to Benghazi

But Hicks said he thought the military failed to give permission for the flight. 'They just didn't have the right authority from the right level,' he said.

The Special Forces team was organized and about to drive to a C-130 aircraft with their gear, Hicks testified, when Gibson's superiors ordered him to tell them to stand down.

'He got a phone call from SOCAFRICA which said, "you can't go now, you don't have authority to go now",' Hicks recalled. 'They were told not to board the flight, so they missed it.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2321499/Benghazi-witness-Army-commander-said-commando-rescue-scrapped-State-Department-leaders-bigger-balls-military-chiefs.html#ixzz31HiTqxIG
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


So your claim there was no stand down order was absolute BULLSHIT.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 10:12:22 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
And according to maps of obtained by Judicial Watch, by suit.



a). The USS Laboon was on station and capable of responding. The laboon has a flight deck and according to Lt Colonel Gibson Smith was equiped with 2 seahawks, capable of air to ground operations.

b). CBS News has learned that during the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi, the Obama Administration did not convene its top interagency counterterrorism resource: the Counterterrorism Security Group, (CSG).

"The CSG is the one group that's supposed to know what resources every agency has. They know of multiple options and have the ability to coordinate counterterrorism assets across all the agencies," a high-ranking government official told CBS News. "They were not allowed to do their job. They were not called upon."

Absent coordination from Counterterrorism Security Group, a senior U.S. counterterrorism official says the response to the crisis became more confused. The official says the FBI received a call during the attack representing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and requesting agents be deployed. But he and his colleagues agreed the agents "would not make any difference without security and other enablers to get them in the country and synch their efforts with military and diplomatic efforts to maximize their success."

Another senior counter terrorism official says a hostage rescue team was alternately asked to get ready and then stand down throughout the night, as officials seemed unable to make up their minds.

A third potential responder from a counter-terror force stationed in Europe says components of AFICOM -- the military's Africa Command based in Stuttgart, Germany -- were working on course of action during the assault. But no plan was put to use.

The official says a protocol set forth in a classified presidential directive calls for the Counterterrorism Security Group (CSG) to be convened in the event of a possible terrorist attack. According to a public military document, the directive was designed to "synchronize the efforts of all the government agencies that have a role to play in the Global War on Terrorism."

The Administration also didn't call on the only interagency, on-call, short notice team poised to respond to terrorist incidents worldwide: the Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST). FEST's seasoned experts leave within four hours of notification and can provide "the fastest assistance possible."

FEST Teams deployed immediately after al Qaeda bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa in 1998, and the USS Cole in 2000, but were not used for Benghazi, to the chagrin of some insiders. It's likely that the CSG task force, if contacted, would have recommended FEST aid.

"First a tactical response was needed," says a senior U.S. counterterrorism official, "and while that was being implemented, the holistic response could have been developed and deployed within hours" which could have allowed the FBI investigate safely on site well ahead of the "24 days it took."

(Remember - the safe site that was left completely unsecured, with the result that our entire spy network in libya was rolled up??)

c). Even if you believe that help wouldn't have arrived in time - we had personnel wounded - some severely - that waited 20 hours for evacuation. They could have died from our indifference.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 10:25:36 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
(1) Murdered US Ambassador Chris Stevens' second in command, Gregory Hicks, was instructed not to speak with a Congressional investigator by State Department lawyers.* Hicks said he'd "never" faced a similar demand at any point during his distinguished 22-year diplomatic career. When he refused to comply with this request, the State Department dispatched an attorney to act as a "minder," who insisted on sitting in on all of Hicks' discussions with members of Congress (higher quality video is available here). Sec. Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, later excoriated Hicks for cooperating with the investigation and permitting himself to be interviewed without a chaperone.

3). He and others on the ground -- including Amb. Stevens -- recognized the raid as a coordinated terrorist attack from the very beginning. Hicks testified that he personally told Sec. Clinton as much at 2 am on the night of the attack, along with her senior staff. [UPDATE - Rep. Trey Gowdy also revealed an email sent on 9/12 in which Assistant Sec. Jones confirmed to a Libyan official that the attack had been carried out by terrorist organization Ansar al-Sharia].

Clinton told at 2am it was a TERRORIST ATTACK. Dogherty and woods died at 5:15am.

4). Whistle-blower Mark Thompson, a career counter-terrorism official at State, said he called the White House to request the immediate deployment of a Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST) to Benghazi. He was told it was "not the right time" to do so, then was cut out of the communications loop.

5). The US government did not seek permission from the Libyan government to fly any aircraft into Libyan airspace, aside from a drone. The witnesses testified that they believe the Libyan government would have complied with any such request. The fact that none was even made indicates that there was never a plan or intention to rush reinforcements to Benghazi.


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 11:26:29 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
And the lies fly yet again

And lies I've already dealt with before. Why don't you even bother trying to find new ones?
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


Bullshit.

There were 16 (or 17) people at the CIA compound. The AP reported:

Westmoreland said the CIA security contractors loaded into two vehicles, with weapons ready, the moment they heard the radio call for help from the diplomatic building. Some wanted to rush to the U.S. compound roughly a mile away, and their agitation grew as they heard increasing panic when the diplomats reported the militants were setting the compound on fire.

The CIA team leader and the CIA chief at the Benghazi annex told committee members that they were trying to gather Libyan allies and intelligence before racing into the fray, worried that they might be sending their security team into an ambush with little or no backup.

At least one of those security contractors, a former U.S. Army Ranger, was told to “wait” at least twice, and he argued with his security team leader, according to his testimony, related by Westmoreland. Westmoreland declined to share the names of the officers who testified because they are still CIA employees


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/now-cia-contradicts-govt-benghazi-account/#pLqJ3Tu2Yk5aDvSF.99

The CIA compound was a secret base. We don't reveal the presence of secret facilities lightly. I'm sure the decision to do so had to come from higher up than the local station chief.



quote:

More importantly Gregory Hicks testified:

The Obama administration denied Special Forces commandos permission to board a military flight to help defend the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi while it was under attack, according to State Department career officer Gregory Hicks, a former second-in-command in the North African country.

This was 4 guys without long arms or body armor. they could have done nothing. The real security guys in Tripoli did go. This has been explained to you several times before Why do you keep repeating this bullshit?

And furthermore the C-130 they would have boarded? It was the one that flew to Benghazi and brought the bodies out. No matter what they would not have been in time.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 11:45:24 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

And according to maps of obtained by Judicial Watch, by suit.
a). The USS Laboon was on station and capable of responding. The laboon has a flight deck and according to Lt Colonel Gibson Smith was equiped with 2 seahawks, capable of air to ground operations.

An Arleigh Burke can carry 1 SH-60 not 2 and while it can be armed it is not meant for ground strike. Seahawks are the navalized versions of the Blackhawk. At most it could carry a single hellfire and a door mounted machine gun. Sending it into such a hostile environment would simply get it shot down.

quote:

b). CBS News has learned that during the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi, the Obama Administration did not convene its top interagency counterterrorism resource: the Counterterrorism Security Group, (CSG).

So? You do understand this was a very small attack on a very minor diplomatic compound right?


quote:

A third potential responder from a counter-terror force stationed in Europe says components of AFICOM -- the military's Africa Command based in Stuttgart, Germany -- were working on course of action during the assault. But no plan was put to use.

The guys from Rota and Croatia couldn't get there in time so how could a team from Stuttgart, even farther away get there?

You seem to be operating under the delusion that the scope of what was happening was apparent to the President or anyone else back in Washington a soon as the attack began. I doubt it was apparent that this was a significant attack until the Ambassador was dead. These things are chaotic and communication is always confused. But of course you don't care about reality all you care about is trying to score political points.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/9/2014 11:54:46 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

(1) Murdered US Ambassador Chris Stevens' second in command, Gregory Hicks, was instructed not to speak with a Congressional investigator by State Department lawyers.* Hicks said he'd "never" faced a similar demand at any point during his distinguished 22-year diplomatic career. When he refused to comply with this request, the State Department dispatched an attorney to act as a "minder," who insisted on sitting in on all of Hicks' discussions with members of Congress (higher quality video is available here). Sec. Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, later excoriated Hicks for cooperating with the investigation and permitting himself to be interviewed without a chaperone.

Nonsense. With crazy Issa looking to prosecute someone for something letting Hicks cooperate with the inquisitors was asking for trouble. 

quote:

3). He and others on the ground -- including Amb. Stevens -- recognized the raid as a coordinated terrorist attack from the very beginning. Hicks testified that he personally told Sec. Clinton as much at 2 am on the night of the attack, along with her senior staff. [UPDATE - Rep. Trey Gowdy also revealed an email sent on 9/12 in which Assistant Sec. Jones confirmed to a Libyan official that the attack had been carried out by terrorist organization Ansar al-Sharia].
And a response started getting prepped within 40 minutes of that notification. Which is pretty damned fast for the middle of a Tuesday night half way round the world.

quote:

4). Whistle-blower Mark Thompson, a career counter-terrorism official at State, said he called the White House to request the immediate deployment of a Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST) to Benghazi. He was told it was "not the right time" to do so, then was cut out of the communications loop.

And WTF would they have done?

quote:

5). The US government did not seek permission from the Libyan government to fly any aircraft into Libyan airspace, aside from a drone. The witnesses testified that they believe the Libyan government would have complied with any such request. The fact that none was even made indicates that there was never a plan or intention to rush reinforcements to Benghazi.

I've gone over this with you in tedious detail. No aircraft that could have had any useful effect on the action were in range. Also we did rush reinforcements to Benghazi. Glen Doherty was one of those reinforcements. Lying about it dishonors his sacrifice.




< Message edited by DomKen -- 5/9/2014 11:55:05 PM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/10/2014 4:39:55 AM   
SadistDave


Posts: 801
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

I've gone over this with you in tedious detail. No aircraft that could have had any useful effect on the action were in range.




That's not exactly true. However, the Croatia story is irrelevant even if it is true. I actually agree with you on that point. Unfortunately foryou and the Bamster though, there WERE aircraft that could have done something.

There are Spanish F/A-18s in Singonella Italy 30 minutes away under NATO command, along with the 40 U.S. units there including a transport unit. Most of the American units are logistical, but I can't get a complete list which suggests at least one combat unit that could have been on the ground in Benghazi within 2 hours. Ground troops from Singonella aside, I'm not 100% on how that works, but I'm pretty sure those Hornets would have been available if we had simply asked.

There is also the 555th Fighter Wing out of Aviano which is only 1680km as the F-16 flies. At mach 1 that's a 90 minute flight time to Benghazi. The 555th is under NATO control, but has the ability to fly U.S. military missions AND is a combat unit that can be in the air in just a few minutes. This unit could have easily been there within 2 hours of recieving an alert to scramble. Incidentally, Lybia is, and was, part of their mission.

Aviano also billets an Airborne Brigade...

If you honestly think that an F-16 or a Hornet couldn't have done something until the Airborne units arrived, then you're kidding yourself. Hornet strafing runs are devastating, and both aircraft can use a wide variety of air-to-ground ordinance. Since Singonella Naval Base is only 30 minutes away for a jet fighter, they could have run missions all night long.

All of this is armchair quarterbacking though. We can discuss woulda, shoulda, and coulda all day long, but the simple fact is that Obama chose to do nothing. Hell, no one even knows where he was or what he was doing. All anyone knows is that in the aftermath, his administration chose to cover everything they did (or didn't do) up. Amid the multiple layers of lies, there may be a kernel of truth, but they obviously are afraid of the entire story going public.

-SD-



< Message edited by SadistDave -- 5/10/2014 4:43:25 AM >


_____________________________

To whom it may concern: Just because someone is in a position of authority they do not get to make up their own facts. In spite of what some people here (who shall remain nameless) want to claim, someone over the age of 18 is NOT a fucking minor!

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/10/2014 6:48:19 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Uh, an attack on our american soil is not a nato matter, or not a nato matter than can be glued into an alliance and response in less than a day.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/10/2014 7:09:58 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

I've gone over this with you in tedious detail. No aircraft that could have had any useful effect on the action were in range.




That's not exactly true. However, the Croatia story is irrelevant even if it is true. I actually agree with you on that point. Unfortunately foryou and the Bamster though, there WERE aircraft that could have done something.

There are Spanish F/A-18s in Singonella Italy 30 minutes away under NATO command, along with the 40 U.S. units there including a transport unit. Most of the American units are logistical, but I can't get a complete list which suggests at least one combat unit that could have been on the ground in Benghazi within 2 hours. Ground troops from Singonella aside, I'm not 100% on how that works, but I'm pretty sure those Hornets would have been available if we had simply asked.

I've checked the claim that there were combat aircraft at Sigonella and it does not appear to be true. There are tankers and cargo planes but that won't do much good. There are no ground troops are Sigonella either. It is strictly a logistics hub. The nearest available combat troops were, beyond the guys in Tripoli we did send, were the guys in Rota and Croatiawe had start prepping. Do you think the Pentagon overlooked closer available forces?

quote:

There is also the 555th Fighter Wing out of Aviano which is only 1680km as the F-16 flies. At mach 1 that's a 90 minute flight time to Benghazi. The 555th is under NATO control, but has the ability to fly U.S. military missions AND is a combat unit that can be in the air in just a few minutes. This unit could have easily been there within 2 hours of recieving an alert to scramble. Incidentally, Lybia is, and was, part of their mission.

No it isn't. From cold it is more like 6 or 8 hours. We don't keep F-16's fully fueled and armed sitting on runways in the middle of the night with aircrews and pilots in ready rooms waiting for the call. We'd have to call in the air crews, get the planes warmed up fueled, armed, get a mission planned, get Sigonella to get tankers airborne (it is too far for F-16's to fly with out refueling). Then fly the whole way subsonic. If they tried to fly the whole way at mach 1 they'd have to refuel something like 5 times.

quote:

Aviano also billets an Airborne Brigade...

No, it does not
http://www.aviano.af.mil/units/index.asp

quote:

If you honestly think that an F-16 or a Hornet couldn't have done something until the Airborne units arrived, then you're kidding yourself. Hornet strafing runs are devastating, and both aircraft can use a wide variety of air-to-ground ordinance. Since Singonella Naval Base is only 30 minutes away for a jet fighter, they could have run missions all night long.

There were no hornets 30 minutes away and the f-16's were many hours away and I simply do not believe we would not have sent them if they could have been of use.


(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/10/2014 7:50:36 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

I've gone over this with you in tedious detail. No aircraft that could have had any useful effect on the action were in range.




That's not exactly true. However, the Croatia story is irrelevant even if it is true. I actually agree with you on that point. Unfortunately foryou and the Bamster though, there WERE aircraft that could have done something.

There are Spanish F/A-18s in Singonella Italy 30 minutes away under NATO command, along with the 40 U.S. units there including a transport unit. Most of the American units are logistical, but I can't get a complete list which suggests at least one combat unit that could have been on the ground in Benghazi within 2 hours. Ground troops from Singonella aside, I'm not 100% on how that works, but I'm pretty sure those Hornets would have been available if we had simply asked.

There is also the 555th Fighter Wing out of Aviano which is only 1680km as the F-16 flies. At mach 1 that's a 90 minute flight time to Benghazi. The 555th is under NATO control, but has the ability to fly U.S. military missions AND is a combat unit that can be in the air in just a few minutes. This unit could have easily been there within 2 hours of recieving an alert to scramble. Incidentally, Lybia is, and was, part of their mission.

Aviano also billets an Airborne Brigade...

If you honestly think that an F-16 or a Hornet couldn't have done something until the Airborne units arrived, then you're kidding yourself. Hornet strafing runs are devastating, and both aircraft can use a wide variety of air-to-ground ordinance. Since Singonella Naval Base is only 30 minutes away for a jet fighter, they could have run missions all night long.

All of this is armchair quarterbacking though. We can discuss woulda, shoulda, and coulda all day long, but the simple fact is that Obama chose to do nothing. Hell, no one even knows where he was or what he was doing. All anyone knows is that in the aftermath, his administration chose to cover everything they did (or didn't do) up. Amid the multiple layers of lies, there may be a kernel of truth, but they obviously are afraid of the entire story going public.

-SD-



Sadist Dave

I've already gone through the fact that there were aircraft in range. In nauseating detail including the range of the various planes.

Actually got donkey to actually agree the planes were in range and could have got there in time

(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/10/2014 8:13:41 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

I've gone over this with you in tedious detail. No aircraft that could have had any useful effect on the action were in range.




That's not exactly true. However, the Croatia story is irrelevant even if it is true. I actually agree with you on that point. Unfortunately foryou and the Bamster though, there WERE aircraft that could have done something.

There are Spanish F/A-18s in Singonella Italy 30 minutes away under NATO command, along with the 40 U.S. units there including a transport unit. Most of the American units are logistical, but I can't get a complete list which suggests at least one combat unit that could have been on the ground in Benghazi within 2 hours. Ground troops from Singonella aside, I'm not 100% on how that works, but I'm pretty sure those Hornets would have been available if we had simply asked.

I've checked the claim that there were combat aircraft at Sigonella and it does not appear to be true. There are tankers and cargo planes but that won't do much good. There are no ground troops are Sigonella either. It is strictly a logistics hub. The nearest available combat troops were, beyond the guys in Tripoli we did send, were the guys in Rota and Croatiawe had start prepping. Do you think the Pentagon overlooked closer available forces?

quote:

There is also the 555th Fighter Wing out of Aviano which is only 1680km as the F-16 flies. At mach 1 that's a 90 minute flight time to Benghazi. The 555th is under NATO control, but has the ability to fly U.S. military missions AND is a combat unit that can be in the air in just a few minutes. This unit could have easily been there within 2 hours of recieving an alert to scramble. Incidentally, Lybia is, and was, part of their mission.

No it isn't. From cold it is more like 6 or 8 hours. We don't keep F-16's fully fueled and armed sitting on runways in the middle of the night with aircrews and pilots in ready rooms waiting for the call. We'd have to call in the air crews, get the planes warmed up fueled, armed, get a mission planned, get Sigonella to get tankers airborne (it is too far for F-16's to fly with out refueling). Then fly the whole way subsonic. If they tried to fly the whole way at mach 1 they'd have to refuel something like 5 times.

quote:

Aviano also billets an Airborne Brigade...

No, it does not
http://www.aviano.af.mil/units/index.asp

quote:

If you honestly think that an F-16 or a Hornet couldn't have done something until the Airborne units arrived, then you're kidding yourself. Hornet strafing runs are devastating, and both aircraft can use a wide variety of air-to-ground ordinance. Since Singonella Naval Base is only 30 minutes away for a jet fighter, they could have run missions all night long.

There were no hornets 30 minutes away and the f-16's were many hours away and I simply do not believe we would not have sent them if they could have been of use.




Aviano Maintains a hot crew at all times. .. As you know so the "cold start time" is just a lying irrelevent red herring.

And no. The range of the planes with external tanks once again would have easily got them to sigonella for load out. It also gets them directly to Benghazi but with little time on station.

You get trying to use the round trip distance to say they were out of range. Remember?

What's really going to be interesting is when judicial watch gets the document a four the location of the gunship detailed to Libya. Where it was and when it got called away.

As for the sea Hawks their mission profile includes ground attack.

Bottom line. There were forces and this administration made no attempt to deploy then for political purposes and then led about it.

And there are lots of reasons that the lie matters. Not the least because oboZo infuriated The libyan President who the delayed permission for the cleanup team.

And while we re at it. How's those efforts to arrest those responsible?

Oh yea. Not even on the watch list.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/10/2014 8:41:19 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
LOL, the nutsacker chickenhawks with their self-deluded, non-existant military and logistical expertise, heppin us to the wisdom of their much vaunted hallucinations, indicating that the Joint Chiefs were pansies when they said this is what we could do in that timeframe and this is what we did, in sworn testimony before the committee chaired by the convict Issa in the house, who is now leaving that rathole he made into his own embarrassment and now concentrating on emails from people not directly involved in the fracas in any way, for his next bit of Opera Bouffe.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues - 5/10/2014 9:16:57 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux



Aviano Maintains a hot crew at all times. .. As you know so the "cold start time" is just a lying irrelevent red herring.

A crew on duty does not mean that the planes are fueled and armed. You are not a vet are you?

Let me explain this to you. One or two air crews were on base, asleep in their quarters. Their planes were not fueled and armed but in case of something they could be ready first. Since the crews didn't have to be recalled. But no base keeps aircraft fueled much less armed at all times unless we are at DefCon 3 or above (Cuban missile crisis and the days right after 9/11).

quote:

And no. The range of the planes with external tanks once again would have easily got them to sigonella for load out. It also gets them directly to Benghazi but with little time on station.
This is bullshit
Air force planes don't fly to a navy base to pick up ordnance. The gear is not the same.

quote:

You get trying to use the round trip distance to say they were out of range. Remember?

They are out of range. They have to refuel over the Med. This crazy fantasy that they'd scramble to their jets burn to Sigonella then get armed by aircrews there, what aircrews BTW? Do you think there are USN aircrews trained on putting ordnance on F-16's (a plane the navy does not fly) at a logistics base?, and then fly on is simply ridiculous. The real mission profile would be the mission would get planned and the planes would get fueled and armed at Aviano. Tankers then would get launched from Sigonella.  Then the planes would leave Aviano. They would fly subsonic to the tankers somewhere over the med refuel and then proceed to tBenghazi where they would arrive well after the CIA compound was evacuated to the airport and be of no use at all.

quote:

What's really going to be interesting is when judicial watch gets the document a four the location of the gunship detailed to Libya. Where it was and when it got called away.

What gunship?

quote:

As for the sea Hawks their mission profile includes ground attack.

Do you know what a UH-60 is? Have you ever seen a Blackhawk helicopter? It is a utility chopper. It is not an Apache or a Cobra. Just because it can mount a machine gun and a single missile does mean it is an effective ground attacker. Watch the movie Blackhawk Down and imagine one of those choppers, that is what you're talking about, without the combat troops trying to do something.

quote:

Bottom line. There were forces and this administration made no attempt to deploy then for political purposes and then led about it.
Liar. The real bottom line, the administration did send the troops who could reach Benghazi as soon as the trouble started and when it became clear it was worse than initially believed they had 2 separate special forces teams start prepping to go.

quote:

And there are lots of reasons that the lie matters. Not the least because oboZo infuriated The libyan President who the delayed permission for the cleanup team.

And while we re at it. How's those efforts to arrest those responsible?

Oh yea. Not even on the watch list.

How do you know? Are you privy to the CIA's anti terrorism operations?

< Message edited by DomKen -- 5/10/2014 9:20:20 AM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Ben Ghazi.. the scandal continues Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156