BamaD -> RE: Senseless Gun Violence -- Fearful Homeowner Kills Unarmed German Exchange Student (5/18/2014 3:16:27 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Louve00 quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Louve00 If he was fearless enough to fight off a dog or dogs, especially if he got passed them, then that, to me, would be determining your life could be in danger. But, you gave the guy a chance to stop, put his hands up and face you as a perpetrator, not an aggressor, you took a stance more people should. With several dogs chewing on you, you want us to believe that you would put your hands up and say I give up while he gleefully let the dogs have a little snack...roflmfao....how droll[8|] What's droll here is your comprehension of what my words meant. Since you obviously aren't a mindreader, or even someone who can understand the meaning of 'a different approach', I will take a couple of words to see if then you might understand what I was saying. Turning dogs loose on an intruder, when you have the means to blow their life away with a weapon, is the "humane" way to deal with someone who is not as civil and refined as the person deciding not to make it an automatic deadly invasion. Actually, no, I wouldn't expect him to get up after a dog attack and be able to talk about anything. But he would be alive today to apply his experience of the attack, and possibly remember what it got him. All I'm saying is being rational in an irrational scenario could be golden. If you prefer not to be golden, then that decision is yours. A large dog, or in his case large dogs can kill a man, and it is a lot less humane that a couple of rounds in the chest.
|
|
|
|