Arianna92
Posts: 8
Joined: 9/9/2013 Status: offline
|
Hello to all who care to read this, I have been reading the forums a bit, which made me both believe it'd be useful to hear the advice of this community and a bit scared of the very snarky responses I could get I understand that when it comes to two people having a relationship or a group of friends who know each other well, everyone can use the labels they prefer and that that they most fancy to define their role and rapport, but when it comes to looking for a partner, especially on the internet, it's useful to use terms that are somewhat codified and universally understood. Here's where I find myself in a pickle. Ideally, I wouldn't define anything about my sexuality, not even my orientation, but there are situations when it's needed for people to understand something in less than 3 pages of essay. I've been reading a bit and came to the conclusion that what describes my inclinations best is the term 'bedroom submissive'. According to this sparkly page -http://phoenixdragon.dreamknight87.com/types.htm - and other sources I've read, 'bottom' doesn't really fit me, because I'm not so much into 'playing' casually and organizing scenes, but into a sexual dynamic of power that takes place in a relationship of two people who are, otherwise, equals. Now, it seems like I can't very well express this to my partners, even 'though, I assure you, I've tried. Had it happened once I might have explained through mis-communication, incompatibility or faults of the other party, but since it happened twice -both in a relationship that had a definite bedroom power dynamic without ever being defined as such and in another that started from this website and therefore was defined by the power dynamic-, it must come down to something I do wrong or fail to convey. Both of these people tried to extend what was a sexual dynamic to other areas of my life, one simply by trying it, the other actually stating that this what all submissive women want and eventually grow to become. Now, even taking a Skeptical approach and assuming really everything is possible and people can radically change, I know myself enough to state that such a change is as realistic as me becoming a free-market anarchist into dance music and automatic rifles, a.k.a. quite unlikely. Now, I understand compromise in a romantic relationship and doing things that make the other person happy, alias complying with their desires sometimes, but this, to me, has to be reciprocal and completely transcends the sexual dynamic. But things like ending an abstract argument with a 'I said so' or trying to control my sleeping patterns -I'm a nigh owl and it works for me - and level of physical activity doesn't 'inspire submission or the 'desire to follow the leader' in me, it inspires annoyance and it reminds me of my parents and my adolescence. I'm just out of that phase and it was hard enough fighting against someone else's desire to control me, albeit justified by my age, then, I surely can't stand it now and it contributed greatly to both affairs ending. Now, what am I doing wrong? What am I failing to explain? Are there universal words used to describe someone like me? How can I can I send the clear message to people that I don't believe this is a phase that will eventually bring me to psychologically submit to someone and have someone make my choices for me? Can the fact that I tend to be into older people contribute to this? Thanks very much for your help, Arianna
< Message edited by Arianna92 -- 5/12/2014 11:18:11 AM >
|