RE: Karl Rove

RE: Karl Rove (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

joether -> RE: Karl Rove (5/18/2014 6:55:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RacerJim quote: ORIGINAL: joether If you haven't been following the news.... He was for the notion before he was against it. The 'serious health issue' he refers to is metaphorically what Obama had to deal with in his first term of office: the Birth Certificate issue. And all of us on this forum know how much bullshit was being flung from conservative 'news' (read: propaganda) media sources. Why? Because President Obama is black. For Hillary, its because she's a woman. The level of absolute...FEAR....conservatives have with this woman is such they will go to any lengths to discredit her. No matter how petty, insulting or out-right-dishonest the attack. And now Mr. Rove is backpedalling because he allowed his normal conservative mind to speak freely. He said those words and there are many that heard them. An now, like he always does, is spin the words around to not mean what they truly mean. The only people that will believe him are the same folks that keep voting Republican/Tea Party.... ...The Low Information Voter! "The level of absolute...FEAR....conservatives have with this woman is such they will go to any lengths to discredit her. No matter how petty, insulting or out-right-dishonest the attack." The level of absolute...DISDAIN...liberals had for THAT WOMAN, Hillary Clinton, is such that the Democratic Committee to Impeach the President (Nixon) fired her then 27 year-old ass for UNETHICAL [legal] practices. Is that REALLY the best shot you have? 27 years ago it was 1987. Who was in office there? President REAGAN! Nixon left office in 1974... Maybe you might try to get your FACTS and EVIDENCE straight and correct before trying to slam Mrs. Clinton. But you would rather be part of the 'low information voter' block in this nation.

Musicmystery -> RE: Karl Rove (5/18/2014 7:11:22 AM)
Before you rant, check your own facts. He said she was 27 at the time, not 27 years ago.

joether -> RE: Karl Rove (5/18/2014 7:23:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Before you rant, check your own facts. He said she was 27 at the time, not 27 years ago. But I like ranting to RJ......[:(] Ok, she was 27 years old. He's going to blame someone for something that happened a life time ago on her ability to be President? If that's true, lets apply it across the board.... No one in the Republican Party nor the Tea Party could ever run for even a town major position, let alone Congress or the White House.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Karl Rove (5/18/2014 7:28:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: joether Ok, she was 27 years old. He's going to blame someone for something that happened a life time ago on her ability to be President? If that's true, lets apply it across the board.... No one in the Republican Party nor the Tea Party could ever run for even a town major position, let alone Congress or the White House. I think finding a lily-white politician would be near impossible.

dcnovice -> RE: Karl Rove (5/18/2014 10:08:32 AM)
quote: Are you threatening me?! Nope. [:)] I was (too?) subtly suggesting that the thread had become such a battle of manly egos that it might be faster simply to measure each guy's tool and be done with it.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Karl Rove (5/18/2014 12:06:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice quote: Are you threatening me?! Nope. [:)] I was (too?) subtly suggesting that the thread had become such a battle of manly egos that it might be faster simply to measure each guy's tool and be done with it. I know better than to resolve things like that. I prefer to win. lol

RottenJohnny -> RE: Karl Rove (5/18/2014 12:38:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice quote: Are you threatening me?! Nope. [:)] I was (too?) subtly suggesting that the thread had become such a battle of manly egos that it might be faster simply to measure each guy's tool and be done with it. I got it. It was just my (poor?) attempt to follow humor with humor. [:)]

Musicmystery -> RE: Karl Rove (5/18/2014 12:44:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice quote: Are you threatening me?! Nope. [:)] I was (too?) subtly suggesting that the thread had become such a battle of manly egos that it might be faster simply to measure each guy's tool and be done with it. I know better than to resolve things like that. I prefer to win. lol DS! Humor! And it was even funny!!!! [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D] Nicely done.

thompsonx -> RE: Karl Rove (5/18/2014 12:46:34 PM)
When Pelosi said that they had to pass it (Obamacare) to see what was in it, you can either take what she said (that's not a good thing at all). or take what she meant (that it's so encompassing that you can't really understand the impact it was going to have until it's been passed and you see it in action), which is certainly valid and much better than what she said. And yet your spin at the time was????[8\|]

thompsonx -> RE: Karl Rove (5/18/2014 12:51:10 PM)
If that's true, lets apply it across the board.... No one may serve an elective or appointive job in the government if they have a history of unethical behaviour???? Hmmm yeah I am good with that. But We may not be drawing from a target rich environment.

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 5 [6]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125