Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Voter ID at polls


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Voter ID at polls Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/2/2014 12:26:28 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten
But you dont get a different college ID for being a citizen or non citizen... you just show up and say your college ID number and they snap a photo....

Seriously.... Im trying to understand are you just severely lacking in mental facilities... or do you put on an act to be intentionally inflammatory.


Your right that colleges and universities across the nation do not typically show a difference between 'US Citizen' and not. However, if that student were to go to the polls, they would have needed to obtain the ability to vote in that location before hand. Otherwise, it would be an absentee ballot in their home location (i.e. they cant vote twice). So when they do show up at the polling location, they could present their university/college Photo ID and vote.

How you ask?

College IDs at mid and large size schools tend to scrutinize their identification with paid security persons and/or devices. In the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, those security guards are actually MASS State Police officers (unlike security guards, these guys *DO* carry guns). The College ID's can be used at area merchants/vendors for deals the schools hold with area businesses on discounts. So keeping the college ID credible with those area merchants becomes important to the school for a number of different reasons. Some schools use it as a selling point to entice potential students to attend classes verse another school. Faking a college ID and being caught usually carries some stiff penalties, including expulsion without the ability to transfer credits. Most students in their second year already stand to lose a lot being expulsed from school, so where is the profit in lying?

Before you jump down DK's throat, try to consider this information....



In your area... Colleges in MY area, you show up say your college ID number and some second year tog student takes your photo and prints your id on the spot...

Heres the thing, I can register to vote... being a non citizen... Then show up with my college ID saying I am who I say I am.... and vote....

See how that works there?

Regardless debating with you is pointless... My cat is better at listening then you are, and your stuck on your.... but my rights my rights my rights...Not even caring, that because we are protecting the rights of people like you...

MY rights were violated... IF you needed an ID to do anything in the voting process... MY VOTE IN THIS YEARS PRIMARY WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN TERMED INVALID....

I WAS RESTRICTED FROM VOTING... because some organization signed me up for a party I dont belong to ILLEGALLY...and thats okay.... because voter fraud... never happens... Ever....

Then the problem lies with your local registrar. If a non citizen tries to register here he'll fail. Back when I registered people I'd get back a few failures due to failure to verify citizenship out of every big batch.

The correct place to determine citizenship is where it has always been done, at the registrar not at the polling place each and every time making the process take longer.

(in reply to quizzicalkitten)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/2/2014 6:35:11 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
Proof of citizenship is only the first step.

(For those of you named Ken, proof of identity is the second).

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/2/2014 7:02:39 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Proof of citizenship is only the first step.

(For those of you named Ken, proof of identity is the second).

Make up your minds which matters. Any old photo ID will satisfy as proof of identity.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/2/2014 7:34:46 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Make up your minds which matters. Any old photo ID will satisfy as proof of identity.


It is truly hard to believe that someone can be as totally wrong as often as you are.
In the above quote, both sentences are completely unalterably totally wrong.

Anyone with a knowledge of basic English cannot read post #202 and fail to understand that I consider them both equally important. As indeed they are, if one is discussing the integrity of the vote in the USA.

As for your second sentence- how about, say a "photo ID" from the NRA? La Raza? The First Church of Holy Immigration?

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/2/2014 8:22:26 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

Make up your minds which matters. Any old photo ID will satisfy as proof of identity.


It is truly hard to believe that someone can be as totally wrong as often as you are.
In the above quote, both sentences are completely unalterably totally wrong.

Anyone with a knowledge of basic English cannot read post #202 and fail to understand that I consider them both equally important. As indeed they are, if one is discussing the integrity of the vote in the USA.

As for your second sentence- how about, say a "photo ID" from the NRA? La Raza? The First Church of Holy Immigration?

From anywhere. Who cares. If citizenship is properly established by the registrar then that part is of no more concern. You need to stop mixing up what you are trying to establish.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/2/2014 9:12:18 PM   
quizzicalkitten


Posts: 312
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

Make up your minds which matters. Any old photo ID will satisfy as proof of identity.


It is truly hard to believe that someone can be as totally wrong as often as you are.
In the above quote, both sentences are completely unalterably totally wrong.

Anyone with a knowledge of basic English cannot read post #202 and fail to understand that I consider them both equally important. As indeed they are, if one is discussing the integrity of the vote in the USA.

As for your second sentence- how about, say a "photo ID" from the NRA? La Raza? The First Church of Holy Immigration?

From anywhere. Who cares. If citizenship is properly established by the registrar then that part is of no more concern. You need to stop mixing up what you are trying to establish.



Except its not.... See... The point of GOVERMENT issued IDs is to satisfy both the proof of citizenship and proof if Identification....

Its much harder to fool the dmv

Then someone like yourself as a registrar, If you actually were a registrar, I have a lot of faith that you fucked it up... Kinda like the girl who put a blunt in a wendys burger fucked it up....

Seriously Anyone can register someone else to vote... Takes 5 minutes and a stamp....its why we have fucking DOGS registered in the UK

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/3/2014 4:01:00 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Well, take care of the UK. Here in the US there is no fucking dogs registered to vote, except in analogy.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to quizzicalkitten)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/3/2014 6:30:27 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

Make up your minds which matters. Any old photo ID will satisfy as proof of identity.


It is truly hard to believe that someone can be as totally wrong as often as you are.
In the above quote, both sentences are completely unalterably totally wrong.

Anyone with a knowledge of basic English cannot read post #202 and fail to understand that I consider them both equally important. As indeed they are, if one is discussing the integrity of the vote in the USA.

As for your second sentence- how about, say a "photo ID" from the NRA? La Raza? The First Church of Holy Immigration?

From anywhere. Who cares. If citizenship is properly established by the registrar then that part is of no more concern. You need to stop mixing up what you are trying to establish.



Except its not.... See... The point of GOVERMENT issued IDs is to satisfy both the proof of citizenship and proof if Identification....

Its much harder to fool the dmv

Then someone like yourself as a registrar, If you actually were a registrar, I have a lot of faith that you fucked it up... Kinda like the girl who put a blunt in a wendys burger fucked it up....

Seriously Anyone can register someone else to vote... Takes 5 minutes and a stamp....its why we have fucking DOGS registered in the UK

You really have no clue.

The people who help you fill out the voter registration forms are not the registrar. The registrar is a government employee, county IIRC, who verifies the authenticity of the forms when they are submitted. They have the full power of the government to make sure that Mickey Mouse is a citizen. And the standard form provides them with all the info they need to do that. As a matter of fact when you are doing voter registration you are required by law to turn in every form even ones you know are fraudulent, I did have to turn in Mickey Mouse once, then the registrar's office verifies each one. It's a system that has worked just fine for years and until there is some evidence that it doesn't why change it?

(in reply to quizzicalkitten)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/3/2014 12:26:13 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Well, take care of the UK. Here in the US there is no fucking dogs registered to vote, except in analogy.


The dogs of America want you to sign a formal apology to them on this here forum, for insulting all of them. Comparing Sarah Palin to them.....

Have you no decency!!!!!!

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/3/2014 1:47:37 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave
As for your second sentence- how about, say a "photo ID" from the NRA? La Raza? The First Church of Holy Immigration?


This is the issue that comes up with a student ID from a mid-size to large university/college; the ability to verify the information and how credible is the entity?

Verification:

When a student ID is used, police can check with the school for information about the student ID card. Without a warrant, the school does not have to give any information out other then verifying the Student ID card is current. There are exceptions to this, like anything else, and those are handled on a case-by-case basis. I have no idea how long its been since you were in college (if ever). Modern schools use the Student ID card for more than just identification. Meals, the school store, even concerts are purchased using this card. In some cases, it becomes effectively a limited credit card. So the school would have a financial not just an administrative interest in making sure the cards are not compromised or faked. And tampering with that system can cause a student to be removed from the school entirely. So there are mechanisms in place at the front and back ends to ensure the student ID card is valid and useful for identification purposes. Unlike an NRA card for example, that is not a credible document. The NRA would have a photo of the individual of the card on their files if a warrant was used to obtain that information: Schools keep those records (including photos) in use with their ID cards.

Credibility:

Schools of higher education are physical locations that are easy to find (unless your driving around in Boston, MA). They have been around for a very long period of time, and have established themselves as schools of higher degree programs. They work to keep accredited and follow government rules and regulations (which are pretty in-depth and wide). As I stated above, the student ID card, used for purchasing things on school grounds is one thing. Schools typically make deals with area businesses if the student shows their ID card. In other cases, when the card is used like a credit card, it can be used in normal business transactions. Could someone use their debit/credit card that includes their photo and information upon it to vote? Yes!

The credibility of the school's student ID cards can be used in local area polling locations. Assuming the poll workers are given a free education on spotting fake student ID cards. Maybe even an app on a smart phone that connects directly to the student database at the school to check information in real time.

In both conditions, it comes down to the entity of the card, and the available information on the card. The NRA card might work, if it contained name, address, current photo, age, like a driver's license. But that would be settled at the state level, not the individual polling location.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/4/2014 2:46:18 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

No person both sane and reasonably intelligent can believe that a college ID should be accepted as proof of citizenship.
Not. One.

No. There is absolutely no reason a college ID could not be used for voting. As a matter of fact I defy you to present any reason why it could not be so used.

Because here in Colorado, we have "undocumented immigrants" who are attending college. They have college I.D.s but they are NOT citizens (well...at least until the left gets things fixed for them to be). So there is one reason...at least in this state.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/4/2014 2:48:32 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Oh gee I dunno
Lemme think
Wow tough
tough tough toughee
College students are dim?
No, that's true, but it's not it
Pi R Skewed?
No no no

Wait

How about this?

College ID is not proof of American citizenship?

No, that can't be it.
Because, seriously, any common idiot could have thought of that.
Only an uncommon idiot would have failed to realize that, so, gee,
I dunno

So you got nothing. Got it.

BTW for the truly dim, public universities do know if students are citizens because they test for residency for tuition.

And? That argument of your own proves why a college I.D. should not be used as an I.D. to allow voting. Do you honestly think that colleges do not give I.D.s to their students who are not citizens?

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/4/2014 2:58:10 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Oh gee I dunno
Lemme think
Wow tough
tough tough toughee
College students are dim?
No, that's true, but it's not it
Pi R Skewed?
No no no

Wait

How about this?

College ID is not proof of American citizenship?

No, that can't be it.
Because, seriously, any common idiot could have thought of that.
Only an uncommon idiot would have failed to realize that, so, gee,
I dunno

So you got nothing. Got it.

BTW for the truly dim, public universities do know if students are citizens because they test for residency for tuition.

And? That argument of your own proves why a college I.D. should not be used as an I.D. to allow voting. Do you honestly think that colleges do not give I.D.s to their students who are not citizens?

And if the local registrar is so incompetent that he can't determine citizenship from the registration form, like every other registrar does, then why not have the colleges indicate citizenship on the ID rather than disallowing the use of those ID's for voting? One is a reasonable solution that keeps people's voting rights. The other is a blatantly partisan attempt to keep Democrats from voting.

But the question remains, why can't registrars do the job they have been doing so well for so long and verify citizenship at the time of registration?

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/4/2014 11:50:15 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave
No person both sane and reasonably intelligent can believe that a college ID should be accepted as proof of citizenship.
Not. One.

No. There is absolutely no reason a college ID could not be used for voting. As a matter of fact I defy you to present any reason why it could not be so used.

Because here in Colorado, we have "undocumented immigrants" who are attending college. They have college I.D.s but they are NOT citizens (well...at least until the left gets things fixed for them to be). So there is one reason...at least in this state.


But they cant vote, because they are not....REGISTERED. See that part comes...FIRST...in the process of being allowed to vote.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/5/2014 1:43:06 AM   
SadistDave


Posts: 801
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave
No person both sane and reasonably intelligent can believe that a college ID should be accepted as proof of citizenship.
Not. One.

No. There is absolutely no reason a college ID could not be used for voting. As a matter of fact I defy you to present any reason why it could not be so used.

Because here in Colorado, we have "undocumented immigrants" who are attending college. They have college I.D.s but they are NOT citizens (well...at least until the left gets things fixed for them to be). So there is one reason...at least in this state.


But they cant vote, because they are not....REGISTERED. See that part comes...FIRST...in the process of being allowed to vote.


I think you're missing the point here...

You seem to be under the impression that registering to vote requires proof that a person is eligable to vote, but that is simply not true. A person can register with nothing more than a utility bill in many states. Also, in many states you only need to establish your identity the first time you register in that state, and registration can be done by mail thereafter. There is, in fact, no federal requirement that forces states to even check your I.D., let alone your citizenship status, and many choose not to. That means that lots and lots of people who can simply manage to get their electricity turned on can vote. That leads to a whole other set of issues, because it's not that difficult to get your electricity turned on even if you're a non-citizen.

Requiring a photo I.D. is no guarantee that the people casting votes during elections are actually legally entitled to vote, but it's a step in the right direction. You may not be aware, but there's a little problem worldwide known as identity theft. Although the FBI doesn't mention voting specifically, it does go into detail about how people use fake I.D.s to get real I.D.s, steal benefits from taxpayers, establish themselves illegally so they can get jobs and homes. I find it unlikely that very many criminal immigrants would get fake I.D.s specifically to vote, but after establishing themselves in this country through the use of fake I.D.s they could very easily register and vote.

Requiring a valid photo I.D. at the polls means that at some point every voter has at least provided some sort of paperwork establishing their citizenship to someone, whether that's to the DMV, the Post Office, or the military before being allowed to vote. Even though there is no guarantee that their paperwork is actually real, at least it will have been seen by someone who should have a pretty good idea of it's validity.

Furthermore, many voter registration cards are just a piece of card stock with someones basic information typed on it. They aren't considered valid I.D. in most places, and are actually easy enough to fake on a home computer that even distributing them is idiotic.

-SD-

_____________________________

To whom it may concern: Just because someone is in a position of authority they do not get to make up their own facts. In spite of what some people here (who shall remain nameless) want to claim, someone over the age of 18 is NOT a fucking minor!

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/5/2014 3:24:35 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

And if the local registrar is so incompetent that he can't determine citizenship from the registration form, like every other registrar does, then why not have the colleges indicate citizenship on the ID rather than disallowing the use of those ID's for voting? One is a reasonable solution that keeps people's voting rights. The other is a blatantly partisan attempt to keep Democrats from voting.

But the question remains, why can't registrars do the job they have been doing so well for so long and verify citizenship at the time of registration?



How does it keep democrats from voting? Why is it any harder for a democrat to get an id than a republican? And what would be the point of indicating citizenship on the college id. Are you suggesting that although you have been fighting requiring id to vote, you would be ok if they used college id's as well? That makes even less sense than your bullshit claim that this is all a ploy to stop democrats from voting.

< Message edited by thishereboi -- 6/5/2014 3:25:05 AM >


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/5/2014 5:39:39 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

And if the local registrar is so incompetent that he can't determine citizenship from the registration form, like every other registrar does, then why not have the colleges indicate citizenship on the ID rather than disallowing the use of those ID's for voting? One is a reasonable solution that keeps people's voting rights. The other is a blatantly partisan attempt to keep Democrats from voting.

But the question remains, why can't registrars do the job they have been doing so well for so long and verify citizenship at the time of registration?



How does it keep democrats from voting? Why is it any harder for a democrat to get an id than a republican? And what would be the point of indicating citizenship on the college id. Are you suggesting that although you have been fighting requiring id to vote, you would be ok if they used college id's as well? That makes even less sense than your bullshit claim that this is all a ploy to stop democrats from voting.

I'm saying that the ID requirements are very transparently tailored to exclude Democratic demographics. Look at the Texas voter ID list. It excludes college ID's but includes concealed carry permits.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/5/2014 12:07:39 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
I think you're missing the point here...


The two central issues of this thread:

1 ) There is no evidence that supports the 'massive voter fraud problem' in America that Republican/Tea Party state

2 ) A voter ID law violates my 4th amendment right

I've been very clear on both of these. Including doing the research (aka simple google searches) that showed DS's 'evidence' to be bogus. Not one person so far has countered either central point here.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
You seem to be under the impression that registering to vote requires proof that a person is eligable to vote, but that is simply not true. A person can register with nothing more than a utility bill in many states. Also, in many states you only need to establish your identity the first time you register in that state, and registration can be done by mail thereafter. There is, in fact, no federal requirement that forces states to even check your I.D., let alone your citizenship status, and many choose not to. That means that lots and lots of people who can simply manage to get their electricity turned on can vote. That leads to a whole other set of issues, because it's not that difficult to get your electricity turned on even if you're a non-citizen.


Do you not bother to read the article?

"Do I need to show proof of identification when I vote if I registered using the National Form?

If you are voting for the first time in your state and are registering by mail, Federal law may require you to show proof of identification the first time you vote. This proof of identification includes the following (or if voting by mail, a COPY of the following):

A current and valid photo identification; OR
•A current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck or government document that shows your name and address.

Federal law does not require you to show proof of identification at the polling place or when voting by mail if (1) you provided COPIES of the above with your National Mail Voter Registration Form; (2) your voter registration form has been verified by an election official; or (3) you are entitled by federal law to vote by absentee ballot. Please note that individual states may have additional voter identification requirements. "

When you register to vote, a person must accomplish two things: 1 ) They are a US Citizen, 2 ) Show proof of residence. Federal law does not require you to show proof in identification at the polling place because...ITS A VIOLATION OF THE 4TH AMENDMENT....


quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
Requiring a photo I.D. is no guarantee that the people casting votes during elections are actually legally entitled to vote, but it's a step in the right direction. You may not be aware, but there's a little problem worldwide known as identity theft. Although the FBI doesn't mention voting specifically, it does go into detail about how people use fake I.D.s to get real I.D.s, steal benefits from taxpayers, establish themselves illegally so they can get jobs and homes. I find it unlikely that very many criminal immigrants would get fake I.D.s specifically to vote, but after establishing themselves in this country through the use of fake I.D.s they could very easily register and vote.


I do believe I pointed out earlier how easily photo ID's get faked for college students to drink underage, right? Which is why area bartenders in Boston, MA obtain additional training to spot the fakes from the genuine articles? And that poll workers outside of these 'college towns' would likely not have such training, thus making it more possible for such IDs to pass by without scrutiny. So why create a whole division of rules/laws that do nothing to protect the vote, when that is present?

The best way to fight voter fraud is to work in the community. Whether that is actual professional work, volunteering, or being a good neighbor. In the first instance, people can recognize you from your business persona. When you volunteer for community organizations, you establish roots with people in that area. So when you show up at the polling place, its not just 'doing the vote' but 'stay and chat with others on all sorts of things outside of politics'. Or just throw a neighborhood party, like a pool party in the summer or new years celebration in the winter. This nation has gotten to the point were we don't know the people five houses down on either side of the road!

Since it requires someone else to make the accusation of wrong doing in this country. You know, as I do, that a person is innocent until proven guilty; that a person is not required to prove their are innocent first.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
Requiring a valid photo I.D. at the polls means that at some point every voter has at least provided some sort of paperwork establishing their citizenship to someone, whether that's to the DMV, the Post Office, or the military before being allowed to vote. Even though there is no guarantee that their paperwork is actually real, at least it will have been seen by someone who should have a pretty good idea of it's validity.


An there in lies the problem. You desire to remove people's rights for some security. Voter fraud has never been a problem in this nation for its state and federal elections. In fact it was never an issue until political analysts started to understand not just 'who' votes' by 'why' they vote. And it was not just generational viewpoints, but age groups and locations. It was determine by the GOP/TP to gain more seats in Congress and the White House, was to undermine people's ability to vote Democrat. Through this fascinating and indepth knowledge of political science, they found that the elderly, students, and poor/homeless tend to vote Democrat in heavy numbers. These groups typically do not have photo IDs for reasons I explained previously. So it shouldn't take a rocket science to understand the obvious motive of the GOP/TP pushing for voter photo ID laws in America. The question is, who here can be intellectually honest about it?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
Furthermore, many voter registration cards are just a piece of card stock with someones basic information typed on it. They aren't considered valid I.D. in most places, and are actually easy enough to fake on a home computer that even distributing them is idiotic.


The issue of disturbing them in this day and age seems silly; but to remove that law (which I suspect) in those states requires the state legislative body. I don't have a voter ID card. Never had none, never needed one. I am who I state I am, and I live where I state I live. And if someone challenged that, I explained previously as well, the process of determining that which would not run the polling location foul with federal law (i.e. the 4th and 5gh amendments specifically).



(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/5/2014 3:15:10 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
Funny how you associate everything with an ulterior motive. The poor have to have some sort of I.D. to collect monies given to them by us (after all, it is our money), students have to have some sort of I.D. to be able to get student loans, the elderly have to present I.D. if asked in order to continue to receive their benefits.

As for your assertion that these groups may come down heavily on the Democrat side, heavily is not to say all. There are students and there are elderly who are Republicans. I don't hear these people protesting over having to cough up I.D. to prove they are a citizen.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 6/5/2014 3:39:35 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

And if the local registrar is so incompetent that he can't determine citizenship from the registration form, like every other registrar does, then why not have the colleges indicate citizenship on the ID rather than disallowing the use of those ID's for voting? One is a reasonable solution that keeps people's voting rights. The other is a blatantly partisan attempt to keep Democrats from voting.

But the question remains, why can't registrars do the job they have been doing so well for so long and verify citizenship at the time of registration?



How does it keep democrats from voting? Why is it any harder for a democrat to get an id than a republican? And what would be the point of indicating citizenship on the college id. Are you suggesting that although you have been fighting requiring id to vote, you would be ok if they used college id's as well? That makes even less sense than your bullshit claim that this is all a ploy to stop democrats from voting.

I'm saying that the ID requirements are very transparently tailored to exclude Democratic demographics. Look at the Texas voter ID list. It excludes college ID's but includes concealed carry permits.



I know what you are saying. What you aren't doing is explaining why it's harder for people on one side of the fence to get an id. Which is why what you are saying is basically bullshit.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Voter ID at polls Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109