Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Voter ID at polls


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Voter ID at polls Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/26/2014 5:34:01 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ChristheBoy
I think you are all a bunch of idiots those that want to vote without ID. 4th and 5th amendment protect you from unlawful search and seizures. Asking someone to identify themselves in order to participate in the most important part of a democracy, i.e. the voting, is not a search or a seizure.


I consider it an unlawful search. Under the 1st amendment, I am allowed to argue it in court! And something like this, I'll take it right up to the US Supreme Court!

I have NEVER shown ID to vote, and not going to start now because some ding-bat idiot conservative/libertarians cant accept that the level of voter fraud in the US is so tiny as to not make even a minimal difference in the final vote.

Prove to me that voter fraud is taking place at even 0.01% of the time. Since 2000, there have been 2068 cases of possible voter fraud. After the research, only 10 cases were confirmed. Each in different states. How many state and federal elections were decided by one vote? That doesn't happen very often....like....once in a Halley's Comet visit!

How many Presidential Elections for the Executive Branch have been decided on just one vote in the last twelve years? None!

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChristheBoy
You can not rent a video from the video store without ID to protect both the store from theft and the client from being charged for items stolen under his account. Like if I Chris, walked into a video store and said ''hi I'm bob, I want to rent this video'', bob would later be charged for a non returned video. I can just imagine one of you non-ID nuts having an insane fit if you went to vote and the person told you 'according to our records you voted an hour ago. You say who was he, how come you let him vote in my place, and they'd answer ''well he said he was you''


When I rented from BlockBuster Video, I used my BlockBuster card. Got videos all the time without once showing a photo ID. All the video stores still in existence around here, use a ID card that does not show someone's photo ID on it. The reason for that, is most use Comcast and/or Netflix.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChristheBoy
But yes I guess turning the issue into a republican versus Democrat issue is more important than protecting your ownership of your own personal vote.


Do you even understand why its a 'Republican' verse 'Democrat' issue?

For starters, when many people vote, Democrats win. When few people vote, Republicans win. What does the Republicans gain by having easy access to the polls? In addition, most senior citizens in this nation do not have birth certificates; so obtaining those state IDs and/or drivers licenses is a REAL hurdle. Where does the homeless/poor lock their birth certificates, let alone their photo IDs up? These are people that tend to vote Democrat in large numbers. The evidence shows it election after election. Republicans and Democrats know this. So if Republicans can manufacture ways to place hurdles and barriers to voting by those 18+ years of age....what do they get for their efforts?

Shouldn't take you longer then five seconds....

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChristheBoy
By the way, requesting ID for voting, is not searching or seizing you (for you paranoid idiots) it is about making sure your vote is protected and held for YOU to make that X in front of your choice, and making sure no one else usurps YOUR right to vote.


Prove to me my vote has been "...usurped..."? You have to give the burden of evidence here. Good Luck!

Did you even bother to read the 4th amendment? Its not paranoia, its THE LAW. Go ask a defense lawyer to explain probable cause to you. It will no doubtfully be HIGHLY informative. Voter ID is as much a violation of the 4th amendment as DOMA is violation of gay people's civil rights. Last I checked, courts across the nation are destroying anti-gay marriage laws put in place years ago at a quick pace. On a side note, how much US Taxpayer money has been used creating those anti-gay marriage laws, maintaining them, and defending them in court actions? And this comes from all those 'fiscal conservatives' that hate wasting taxpayer money on stupid shit....

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChristheBoy
Someone made a remark that only a few thousand issues ever really did arise over the entire nation so why bother. Well if you believe that protecting the integrity of a video store rental is more important than the integrity of the democratic process, well I guess that's your right. The only people wishing to usher in the boogeyman to be feared upon are the same folks that dish out every other moment of fear in America: the GOP/TP. When there is a mass shooting, which political party tells its members to buy up guns & ammo.....or else? Go ahead, say its the Democrats.....


The vote is safe. The penalties for being caught tampering with the vote are so severe that there is little to no profit in the crime. In every state, commonwealth, territory, and district, including the federal level itself!

(in reply to ChristheBoy)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/26/2014 5:53:32 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Too bad. The US Constitution and a whole bunch of court rulings says it is.


No linkety links?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/26/2014 1:52:32 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Too bad. The US Constitution and a whole bunch of court rulings says it is.


No linkety links?


Provided previously. You ignored them then why should I think you won't ignore them now?

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/26/2014 2:33:25 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Too bad. The US Constitution and a whole bunch of court rulings says it is.

No linkety links?

Provided previously. You ignored them then why should I think you won't ignore them now?


Cue the dance music...

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/26/2014 2:39:07 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
I've seen you dance it before. You must be getting pretty light on your feet by now.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/26/2014 2:52:20 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Too bad. The US Constitution and a whole bunch of court rulings says it is.

No linkety links?

Provided previously. You ignored them then why should I think you won't ignore them now?


Cue the dance music...

The fourth amendment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Voter ID struck down in Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/us/politics/pennsylvania-voter-id-law-struck-down.html?_r=0
Wisconsin
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/federal-judge-strikes-down-wisconsins-voter-id-law-b99258822z1-257200321.html

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/26/2014 3:06:25 PM   
ThatDaveGuy69


Posts: 978
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
The REAL threat to the integrity of the vote is not from someone trying to vote 2 or 3 times. The real danger is the proprietary electronic voting machines. All we have is the say-so of the manufacturers that they are safe and secure. And since there is no paper trail we won't ever know if they were right until there is some huge scandal. You would think that at the very least they could print out a receipt that shows how you voted. Seems like it should have been a part of the original bid spec.

But I digress...
Voter ID laws are nothing but a thinly-veiled attempt at voter suppression by the GOP. Period, end of story. Fortunately, most of us are smart enough to see through the lies.




_____________________________

He said I'd blown a seal. I said fix the damn thing and leave my private life out of this!
What happens in the event horizon STAYS in the Event Horizon!
I have zero tolerance for Zero Tolerance

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/26/2014 4:32:33 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDaveGuy69
The REAL threat to the integrity of the vote is not from someone trying to vote 2 or 3 times. The real danger is the proprietary electronic voting machines. All we have is the say-so of the manufacturers that they are safe and secure. And since there is no paper trail we won't ever know if they were right until there is some huge scandal. You would think that at the very least they could print out a receipt that shows how you voted. Seems like it should have been a part of the original bid spec.

But I digress...
Voter ID laws are nothing but a thinly-veiled attempt at voter suppression by the GOP. Period, end of story. Fortunately, most of us are smart enough to see through the lies.


There is an annual 'hacker convention' held in different cities around the globe. They are not advertised for obvious reasons; yet many intelligence agencies (FBI, CIA, NSA, etc) do sent individuals to them for the latest stuff. At one of these demos, some hackers used a trench coat loaded with a small 'radio shack' of gizmos and do-dads. Stepping within eight feet, they reprogrammed the machine to vote for The Easter Bunny. An proved that machine was compromised. The manufacture of that particular type of machine has claimed since that demonstration it can not happen again. It begs the question: "How secure is the vote from this sort of tampering"?

I agree there should be a paper trail with the electronic machines; if only to have a back up system should the primary fail. After the election, people want to know a quick count. Much later, another tally can be performed with the paper to determine accuracy of the vote in question.

The hackers got this idea, as they stated, from the problems of electronc voting booths during the Gore-Bush presidential battle in 2000. Many of these machines deployed voted for Bush in a high degree. The conspiracy theories flew all over the place. Still, a paper trail would have been a responsible action to keep the public's trust in the system.

(in reply to ThatDaveGuy69)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/27/2014 7:13:52 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The fourth amendment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution


That's not a link to an opinion that differed from mine.

quote:

Voter ID struck down in Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/us/politics/pennsylvania-voter-id-law-struck-down.html?_r=0
Wisconsin
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/federal-judge-strikes-down-wisconsins-voter-id-law-b99258822z1-257200321.html


Interesting to note that neither of those two links mentioned that requiring ID to prove you are a Citizen with the right to vote was an unreasonable search.

Also interesting to note was that the PA link also included:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/washington/28cnd-scotus.html

That would be the SCOTUS upholding a State Voter ID law.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/27/2014 7:56:17 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The fourth amendment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution


That's not a link to an opinion that differed from mine.

quote:

Voter ID struck down in Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/us/politics/pennsylvania-voter-id-law-struck-down.html?_r=0
Wisconsin
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/federal-judge-strikes-down-wisconsins-voter-id-law-b99258822z1-257200321.html


Interesting to note that neither of those two links mentioned that requiring ID to prove you are a Citizen with the right to vote was an unreasonable search.

Also interesting to note was that the PA link also included:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/washington/28cnd-scotus.html

That would be the SCOTUS upholding a State Voter ID law.


And 2 other rulings over turning ID laws and there are several more cases under way. There is no reason to believe any of these strictly partisan ID laws will survive.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/27/2014 7:59:52 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The fourth amendment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

That's not a link to an opinion that differed from mine.
quote:

Voter ID struck down in Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/us/politics/pennsylvania-voter-id-law-struck-down.html?_r=0
Wisconsin
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/federal-judge-strikes-down-wisconsins-voter-id-law-b99258822z1-257200321.html

Interesting to note that neither of those two links mentioned that requiring ID to prove you are a Citizen with the right to vote was an unreasonable search.
Also interesting to note was that the PA link also included:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/washington/28cnd-scotus.html
That would be the SCOTUS upholding a State Voter ID law.

And 2 other rulings over turning ID laws and there are several more cases under way. There is no reason to believe any of these strictly partisan ID laws will survive.


The two links you provided were of a State judge overturning an ID law, and a Federal judge overturning an ID law, but they trump SCOTUS upholding an ID law?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/27/2014 8:36:30 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The fourth amendment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

That's not a link to an opinion that differed from mine.
quote:

Voter ID struck down in Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/us/politics/pennsylvania-voter-id-law-struck-down.html?_r=0
Wisconsin
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/federal-judge-strikes-down-wisconsins-voter-id-law-b99258822z1-257200321.html

Interesting to note that neither of those two links mentioned that requiring ID to prove you are a Citizen with the right to vote was an unreasonable search.
Also interesting to note was that the PA link also included:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/washington/28cnd-scotus.html
That would be the SCOTUS upholding a State Voter ID law.

And 2 other rulings over turning ID laws and there are several more cases under way. There is no reason to believe any of these strictly partisan ID laws will survive.


The two links you provided were of a State judge overturning an ID law, and a Federal judge overturning an ID law, but they trump SCOTUS upholding an ID law?


They do at this time. SCOTUS has not overturned those cases.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/27/2014 8:45:36 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The fourth amendment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

That's not a link to an opinion that differed from mine.
quote:

Voter ID struck down in Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/us/politics/pennsylvania-voter-id-law-struck-down.html?_r=0
Wisconsin
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/federal-judge-strikes-down-wisconsins-voter-id-law-b99258822z1-257200321.html

Interesting to note that neither of those two links mentioned that requiring ID to prove you are a Citizen with the right to vote was an unreasonable search.
Also interesting to note was that the PA link also included:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/washington/28cnd-scotus.html
That would be the SCOTUS upholding a State Voter ID law.

And 2 other rulings over turning ID laws and there are several more cases under way. There is no reason to believe any of these strictly partisan ID laws will survive.

The two links you provided were of a State judge overturning an ID law, and a Federal judge overturning an ID law, but they trump SCOTUS upholding an ID law?

They do at this time. SCOTUS has not overturned those cases.


Has SCOTUS upheld them? There's a difference between being upheld and not being overturned yet (which is not to imply that they definitely will be overturned).

How did you come down on the challenges to the ACA that haven't made it to SCOTUS, but have been upheld by lower courts?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/27/2014 9:39:11 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The fourth amendment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

That's not a link to an opinion that differed from mine.
quote:

Voter ID struck down in Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/us/politics/pennsylvania-voter-id-law-struck-down.html?_r=0
Wisconsin
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/federal-judge-strikes-down-wisconsins-voter-id-law-b99258822z1-257200321.html

Interesting to note that neither of those two links mentioned that requiring ID to prove you are a Citizen with the right to vote was an unreasonable search.
Also interesting to note was that the PA link also included:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/washington/28cnd-scotus.html
That would be the SCOTUS upholding a State Voter ID law.

And 2 other rulings over turning ID laws and there are several more cases under way. There is no reason to believe any of these strictly partisan ID laws will survive.

The two links you provided were of a State judge overturning an ID law, and a Federal judge overturning an ID law, but they trump SCOTUS upholding an ID law?

They do at this time. SCOTUS has not overturned those cases.


Has SCOTUS upheld them? There's a difference between being upheld and not being overturned yet (which is not to imply that they definitely will be overturned).

How did you come down on the challenges to the ACA that haven't made it to SCOTUS, but have been upheld by lower courts?


The silly contraceptive stuff? I think Hobby Lobby and the nuns should have ben laughed out of court. Corporations can't have religions.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/27/2014 10:20:11 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The silly contraceptive stuff? I think Hobby Lobby and the nuns should have ben laughed out of court. Corporations can't have religions.


Or the challenges that are coming. Most on the Left will say that SCOTUS has already ruled the ACA is constitutional, so that's the end of it. It's not.

Are you opposed to going through a metal detector to get into a public courthouse?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/28/2014 6:19:39 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDaveGuy69

The REAL threat to the integrity of the vote is not from someone trying to vote 2 or 3 times. The real danger is the proprietary electronic voting machines. All we have is the say-so of the manufacturers that they are safe and secure. And since there is no paper trail we won't ever know if they were right until there is some huge scandal. You would think that at the very least they could print out a receipt that shows how you voted. Seems like it should have been a part of the original bid spec.

But I digress...
Voter ID laws are nothing but a thinly-veiled attempt at voter suppression by the GOP. Period, end of story. Fortunately, most of us are smart enough to see through the lies.





We had a kid come into the store the other day and try to buy beer. When the guy working the cash register refused to sell it to him because he didn't have id he claimed that the only reason the law requires you to show id is to keep blacks from enjoying a cold beer like the rest of the country. I have to say I thought that was just as stupid as the voter suppression claim. But maybe the two of you could get together (you will have to buy the beer) and commiserate on how evil the gop is and how the idea of having to show id for anything is just a evil plot to stop minorities from enjoying life.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to ThatDaveGuy69)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/28/2014 6:24:21 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

It begs the question: "How secure is the vote from this sort of tampering"?



Well according to some posters on here no one will commit voter fraud because it is illegal and a few others try to tell you it's not a big enough problem to worry about so really what difference does it make? If you are going to fight something as simple as showing your id I doubt you are going to do anything about this either. Well unless the right suddenly says it's not an issue, then I can see the left rushing in and having a fit, but otherwise I doubt they care.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/28/2014 6:30:12 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The silly contraceptive stuff? I think Hobby Lobby and the nuns should have ben laughed out of court. Corporations can't have religions.


Or the challenges that are coming. Most on the Left will say that SCOTUS has already ruled the ACA is constitutional, so that's the end of it. It's not.

Are you opposed to going through a metal detector to get into a public courthouse?



How about slavery? Roe v Wade? The 24th amendment?


I think going through a metal detector to get into a PUBLIC courthouse is a violation of my right against unreasonable search and seizure, and my second amendment rights.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/28/2014 6:33:57 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The silly contraceptive stuff? I think Hobby Lobby and the nuns should have ben laughed out of court. Corporations can't have religions.


Or the challenges that are coming. Most on the Left will say that SCOTUS has already ruled the ACA is constitutional, so that's the end of it. It's not.

Are you opposed to going through a metal detector to get into a public courthouse?



How about slavery? Roe v Wade? The 24th amendment?


I think going through a metal detector to get into a PUBLIC courthouse is a violation of my right against unreasonable search and seizure, and my second amendment rights.




In that case you might want to avoid this part of the country because the majority of them make you go through a metal detector. Same with airports although hopefully the bathrooms are still accessible. Wouldn't want to cut you off from your weekend getaways.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Vote... - 5/28/2014 10:11:58 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
It begs the question: "How secure is the vote from this sort of tampering"?

Well according to some posters on here no one will commit voter fraud because it is illegal and a few others try to tell you it's not a big enough problem to worry about so really what difference does it make? If you are going to fight something as simple as showing your id I doubt you are going to do anything about this either. Well unless the right suddenly says it's not an issue, then I can see the left rushing in and having a fit, but otherwise I doubt they care.


The original poster that started this tangent was referring to electronic voting machines that left no paper trail. One person, as I pointed out in the post above, showed a few years ago at a 'hackers' convention he could compromise the booth from a mere eight feet away. He did not turn just one vote to the choose character, but ALL the votes. A Voter ID requirement would not have stopped him. A paper trail would have mitigated the electronic errors.

What keeps voter fraud from getting out of hand on a small scale, let alone a major one, is the 'Profit verse Penalty'. Is Robbing a few million dollars worth the risk of spending twenty years in jail; for some it is! Right now, the penalty for voter fraud in every state and federal level is quite severe. The potential profit does not come close to outweighing the heavy penalty. From observed human behavior of the last three or four elections, it seems those penalties are keeping potential voter fraud to a near 'nil' level.

To use a metaphor here, it would be like being just one m.p.h. over the posted speed limit. You loose your license to drive, your car/truck/cycle is taken away and crushed and you owe a fine equal to the original cost of the vehicle when it was brand new. How many people would drive near the speed limit? We might find a few jokers, but the nearly total sum of the population would NEVER think to drive within five m.p.h. of the posted speed limit.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Oops. Voter ID advocate Asa Hutchinson forgets Voter ID at polls Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109