vincentML -> RE: The Erosion of Progress by Religions (6/9/2014 12:49:42 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GotSteel quote:
ORIGINAL: MercTech Consider that fanaticism stifles science; not a particular religion. People have been translating Tyson's position to mean fundamentalist, literalist, extremest and now fanatic but I don't think that's Tyson's position. For instance Tyson makes a point of mentioning Michael Faraday's Christian Fundamentalism and yet the guy was a brilliant scientist who's name everyone should recognize from one of his least important inventions the Faraday cage. And if you want to talk about fanaticism, Tyson points out that Sir Isaac Newton worked for years hold up in a room all day, every day, trying to decode secret messages from the Bible. Yet to the extent Newton kept his god out of his physics, well I think everyone is aware of his genius. I'm of the impression that Dr. Tyson thinks of the issue as revelation vs. investigation. Al-Ghazali's achievement was to expand the role of Sufism in Islamic philosophy. Sufism is an inner mystical core of 'knowledge' about the Truth of God. A-G had come to the conclusion that the Truth could not be reached through demonstration of Reason nor Revelation. My impression is sort of like Kierkegaard's "leap of faith." There is some back and fourth discussion about Tyson's comments on Wiki Talk. I will relate two opposing opinions here. None of them, however, refers to the Mongol Conquests. I just came across this speech of Neil deGrasse Tyson in which he said that Imam Ghazali wrote: "Mathematics is the work of Devil". In such a scholarly seminar or conference, he does not even cite a single sentence of Ghazali, which would justify what he says. It seems that he is completely unfamiliar with the works of Ghazali. Here are some books of Ghazali in which he directly talks about Mathematics; its status in Philosophy and in Islam: al-Munqidh min ad-dalal, Miyar al-Ilm fi fan al-mantiq (Criterion of Knowledge in the Art of Logic) and in the Preface of Incoherence of Philosophers. -Ariana310 07:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC) And this one: He cites the line about wool turning black in the fire because Allah wills it rather than a chemical change. Al-Ghazali did help launch Sufism into the mainstream and result in the downfall of Baghdad as the intellectual capital of the world. There's a reason why most of the science from that time gets traced back to that period in time and ever since the Muslim world has stopped producing any good scientific literature or study. He may not have been directly responsible but he did a lot to help orthodox Islam to take charge in the area. Tyson never argued with was the downfall of society or civilization... just that it was the downfall of independent thought and scientific inquiry in the area. He doesn't appear to be wrong. It isn't a criticism if al-Ghazali more of Sufism itself, but does warrant a note in the article as others have prior to and since made the claim and it's largely accurate. Tat 03:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC) ciao [:)]
|
|
|
|