FightingChains -> RE: Cuckolding question/advice (6/11/2014 3:45:17 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AmoraMora quote:
ORIGINAL: FightingChains I've noticed a lot of dom/mes say this, and I wonder why fulfilling a sub's fantasy is such a bad thing. I mean, there's a difference between being a fetish delivery system and being considerate of your sub's desires. Sooner or later, if a sub isn't getting his/her desires met, I'm gonna bet he or she will leave eventually. They still have needs too. FieryOpal's advice was sage. Those who identify as monogamous would be very unlikely to entertain such a fantasy. OP - the 'ultimate submission' being something that turns you on and you want to happen. Hmm. If nothing else fazed him, but a man disliked wearing women's clothing with a vengeance, then wore them out in public just for me - that to me would be his ultimate submission. Why do you view being a cuckold as the ultimate submission, when you clearly want it so badly? FightingChains, you mention, needs, fantasies and desires - how do you distinguish between the three? Is having one's partner have sex with somebody else really a need, like air, water, food, warmth, or just a desire? Should all desires be fulfilled? When ladies write that they are not there to fulfill a sub's fantasies, is that not about knowing what they like, and what their parameters are both personally, and within the context of the dynamic they want? I imagine that it is also a deterrence to men who write to them listing what their dominant 'must' do. None of them is going to intentionally choose a partner with whom they are incompatible in terms of desires and likes. I agree that both, or all parts of the dynamic should gain some satisfaction, or they will be unhappy. Fulfilling a sub's fantasy of making him wear a maid's outfit and do my cleaning, or making him eat naked whilst I am fully dressed are easy to do, if I so choose. When that fantasy includes what I do with my body, who with, and how, is when it becomes entirely different. For me personally, that is going into the realms of intimacy, to be shared with somebody that I have feelings for. It is not 'things' that we would be toying with - not whips, furniture or clothes, breakable and easily replaceable. I have imagined incredible scenes in my head, brief flashes and sometimes vividly detailed fantasies that I know would be to my detriment if I pursued them, so I simply abstain; if a sub's fantasy is in that realm, I will not be the one to help fulfill it. Let's be quite clear: I'm not recommending any dominant do things that are beyond their own personal limits. I agree entirely with FieryOpal. And as someone who is monogamous, cuckolding? No way in hell. My dominant nature is part of my intimacy with my guy, not taking away from it with another person. So I agree, hard limit for me, and I completely respect that. I was only meaning to point out that dominants here have an extremely strong propensity to overcompensate for selfish subs who really just want fantasies fulfilled, and overlook subs who have desires that they want fulfilled. They overcompensate to the point where a sub's desires mean nothing. It's hypocritical to suggest subs are seeking 'fetish delivery' and so demand it themselves. Desires, needs, fantasies? Fantasies are something that makes you aroused and perhaps you would like to explore. I know I've had many fantasies I'll never for the life of me explore. Desires are something you want. Needs? You need something that will make life worth living and you find difficult if-not impossible to live without. Fantasy: Scene with someone beating you and dominating you with a flogger. Desire: To be flogged by your dominant. Need: to feel you are overall enjoying your time with your dominant and they are fulfilling you as a person. DarkSteven, I think he may have worded it badly. Probably under the impression he could find someone who'd go "bingo, I agree"! "This is the ultimate form of submission" is different from "this is the ultimate form of submission for me" and I think he might have seemed a bit preachy despite not meaning to be. But hey, I give people the benefit of the doubt. You have a fair point indeed.
|
|
|
|