Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 11:10:30 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
The issue was whether or not a Union within a company can force employees that do not wish to be part of the Union, Union dues? Since those employees would directly benefit from the efforts/actions of the Union on contracts for all employees, the Union's position is that those people should share some of the burden of costs. Those bring the case forward argue they should not be forced to pay because they are not in the Union.

SOURCE

While a narrow win for conservatives whom hate Unions; I find this will just change how the Union argues for contracts and employment in the future. They'll simply demand they have as much right to a new hire as management. An the Union will just ask the question: "Do you support the Union?" When the answer is 'no', the potential candidate is axed from the final list of hires.

Its a narrow lost that will be changed in future interactions with management of a company.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 11:12:30 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
Working stiffs 1
Union Goons 0

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 11:19:29 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

The issue was whether or not a Union within a company can force employees that do not wish to be part of the Union, Union dues? Since those employees would directly benefit from the efforts/actions of the Union on contracts for all employees, the Union's position is that those people should share some of the burden of costs. Those bring the case forward argue they should not be forced to pay because they are not in the Union.

SOURCE

While a narrow win for conservatives whom hate Unions; I find this will just change how the Union argues for contracts and employment in the future. They'll simply demand they have as much right to a new hire as management. An the Union will just ask the question: "Do you support the Union?" When the answer is 'no', the potential candidate is axed from the final list of hires.

Its a narrow lost that will be changed in future interactions with management of a company.

.....except in right-to-work states. I worked in Va. a RTW state and enjoyed all of the benefits of the union...without joining the union or paying union dues negotiated in Md., a non RTW state. This is an old retry and it failed again.

Look, this is America where the only important thing to remember is that to collectively bargain for $30/hr, is being greedy while a CEO making $30 million a year...is not. Got it ?

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 6/30/2014 11:23:35 AM >

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 11:22:03 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Ja, lotta free riders out there, I believe the union should specifically exempt those people in contract, bargaining, grievance, and all other issues, and if anything goes upside down, say, hey fuck it......on your own pal.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 11:24:00 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Working stiffs 1
Union Goons 0


Goons and thugs 1, free market communists 1 Americans 0.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 11:33:14 AM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
That was not the issue. This went to court because a woman in Illinois was being forced to join a union. SEIU I believe, while caring for her disabled son at home. She felt she shouldn't have to do so and the high court agreed with her.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 11:36:50 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
No, she was not forced to join a union. Read for comprehension, acertaining actual facts.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 1:26:02 PM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
The SEIU tried to force hef to pay union dues, not join the union. Not that it matters at this point

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 1:30:36 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
He new what I meant. It was a very good ruling for the average worker out there. SEIU would have done absolutely nothing for these people except take their money every month.

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 1:48:38 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Yup, they would be working for minimum wage without SEIU.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 2:09:31 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
They are not SEIU members. They are doing very well without them.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 2:12:24 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Yeah, horseshit, they are not doing well without them, they are free riders, your type of communists.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 2:29:06 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
The 'left' is all for freedom of choice, except for choosing to join a union.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 2:31:21 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Nope, they got no problems with you joining or not joining. See, you 'right' are all for welfare checks and people who wont pay their fair share or whats owed.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 2:40:23 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
You are right about that. They don't care if you join or not. They just want the union dues .

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 3:21:03 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
If they never do anything, why do conservatives fear them so?

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 3:37:43 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
I don't fear them. I was a union member for 34 years. I also would have signed up without being forced to do so. What does union leadership fear if joining is truly a choice ? Maybe they will actually have to start doing something for the dues that are collected.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 3:54:33 PM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

You are right about that. They don't care if you join or not. They just want the union dues .


And the workers that don't want to pay the dues just want the union wages. And they want the union benefits. And they want the union backing if there is a labor dispute for being wrongfully fired, etc. But they want all that without having to pay to get it. They expect a free ride. Kinda sounds like what the people on the right say about welfare isn't it?

_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers


(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 3:54:37 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

They are not SEIU members. They are doing very well without them.

No, they are not. Home health workers are among the lowest paid workers in the country. Unionizing them got them pay raises and benefits. This dimwit has cost herself and her coworkers significant wages and benefits since SEIU can no longer afford to negotiate on behalf of these workers.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... - 6/30/2014 4:07:15 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: igor2003


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

You are right about that. They don't care if you join or not. They just want the union dues .


And the workers that don't want to pay the dues just want the union wages. And they want the union benefits. And they want the union backing if there is a labor dispute for being wrongfully fired, etc. But they want all that without having to pay to get it. They expect a free ride. Kinda sounds like what the people on the right say about welfare isn't it?

^ This.

(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> US Supreme Court rules on Labor Issue... Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094