Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


joether -> Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 8:06:11 AM)

Recently, Gov. Rick Perry invited the President to the border to see what is happening in his state.

That if the border was a real issue, Texas, like the other states could simply call up their national guards to patrol the border. If they need US Military soldiers patrolling that border, it must be because those state troops are to stupid and dimwitted to do perform the task, right? No, its because those conservatives want the Americans in the other forty-six states to pay for it, so they don't have to have their taxes raised. Why should people in other states pay for something they will not benefit from directly? Massachusetts were I live, is far from that border; what would I and my fellow citizens gain by giving tax dollars to those states? The ones that are stonewalling the stuff I and others want accomplished in government?

But here is were conservatives just do not 'get it' on border security....

They could easily get what they want right now, *IF* they simply compromise with the President and Democrats on an abundant amount of issues. They'd have awesome border security by the end of the year if not the month, if they came forward with many good improvements on the ACA for example. Or a generous infrastructure improvement and building. Or even supporting a good immigration plan that Democrats want.

But, they don't, because that would be an intelligent way of solving a problem. And as seen in the Republican House on its second straight year of being 'useless to the American people' (i.e. the 2nd least productive Congress); being stupid, foolish, and dogmatic doesn't seem to be doing them any favors.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 8:24:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Recently, Gov. Rick Perry invited the President to the border to see what is happening in his state.
That if the border was a real issue, Texas, like the other states could simply call up their national guards to patrol the border. If they need US Military soldiers patrolling that border, it must be because those state troops are to stupid and dimwitted to do perform the task, right? No, its because those conservatives want the Americans in the other forty-six states to pay for it, so they don't have to have their taxes raised. Why should people in other states pay for something they will not benefit from directly? Massachusetts were I live, is far from that border; what would I and my fellow citizens gain by giving tax dollars to those states? The ones that are stonewalling the stuff I and others want accomplished in government?
But here is were conservatives just do not 'get it' on border security....
They could easily get what they want right now, *IF* they simply compromise with the President and Democrats on an abundant amount of issues. They'd have awesome border security by the end of the year if not the month, if they came forward with many good improvements on the ACA for example. Or a generous infrastructure improvement and building. Or even supporting a good immigration plan that Democrats want.
But, they don't, because that would be an intelligent way of solving a problem. And as seen in the Republican House on its second straight year of being 'useless to the American people' (i.e. the 2nd least productive Congress); being stupid, foolish, and dogmatic doesn't seem to be doing them any favors.


Right, and when a State pushes to use LEO to enforce Federal immigration law, the Left still opposes that, too.

Make up your mind, Joether. Do you want States to enforce immigration law or not?




mnottertail -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 8:32:41 AM)

Where has that happened, and remember, LEOs are partially paid by Fed, and that is just red state welfare.

Now, since the LEO would know where all the illegals are, why aren't we seeing state and local LEOs arresting the corporation officers and management and supervisors that hire them? Thats criminal, the illegal aliens are simply civil law breakers.

You know why, I know why, we all know why. Not a good use of money and resources to go after the illegals, go after the ones that hire them.





KenDckey -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 8:38:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Where has that happened, and remember, LEOs are partially paid by Fed, and that is just red state welfare.

Now, since the LEO would know where all the illegals are, why aren't we seeing state and local LEOs arresting the corporation officers and management and supervisors that hire them? Thats criminal, the illegal aliens are simply civil law breakers.

You know why, I know why, we all know why. Not a good use of money and resources to go after the illegals, go after the ones that hire them.




Let's start with Arizona




joether -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 8:39:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Recently, Gov. Rick Perry invited the President to the border to see what is happening in his state.
That if the border was a real issue, Texas, like the other states could simply call up their national guards to patrol the border. If they need US Military soldiers patrolling that border, it must be because those state troops are to stupid and dimwitted to do perform the task, right? No, its because those conservatives want the Americans in the other forty-six states to pay for it, so they don't have to have their taxes raised. Why should people in other states pay for something they will not benefit from directly? Massachusetts were I live, is far from that border; what would I and my fellow citizens gain by giving tax dollars to those states? The ones that are stonewalling the stuff I and others want accomplished in government?
But here is were conservatives just do not 'get it' on border security....
They could easily get what they want right now, *IF* they simply compromise with the President and Democrats on an abundant amount of issues. They'd have awesome border security by the end of the year if not the month, if they came forward with many good improvements on the ACA for example. Or a generous infrastructure improvement and building. Or even supporting a good immigration plan that Democrats want.
But, they don't, because that would be an intelligent way of solving a problem. And as seen in the Republican House on its second straight year of being 'useless to the American people' (i.e. the 2nd least productive Congress); being stupid, foolish, and dogmatic doesn't seem to be doing them any favors.


Right, and when a State pushes to use LEO to enforce Federal immigration law, the Left still opposes that, too.

Make up your mind, Joether. Do you want States to enforce immigration law or not?


Oh? They cant hire more police officers to police the border? Turning those they find in violation over to the feds for processing? Because they do that already, if you haven't been following all these years. So 'yes', why cant they up their own damn taxes and solve the problem? Why should it be someone's else's problem? Last I checked, the largest unguarded border in the world is the USA/Canada border, and they don't seem to have a problem with illegal immigrants.

If there was an illegal immigrantion problem in my state, the citizens would hire more law enforcement in a show of 'good faith' before asking other Americans in other states to chip in. But then, we are Taxachusetts, not 'Oh I don't want to pay another penny in taxes' Texas.




joether -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 8:41:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Where has that happened, and remember, LEOs are partially paid by Fed, and that is just red state welfare.

Now, since the LEO would know where all the illegals are, why aren't we seeing state and local LEOs arresting the corporation officers and management and supervisors that hire them? Thats criminal, the illegal aliens are simply civil law breakers.

You know why, I know why, we all know why. Not a good use of money and resources to go after the illegals, go after the ones that hire them.

Let's start with Arizona


Be ironic if not amusing, to find those same corporations and companies that hired the illegal immigrants have been heavily supporting the Republican/Tea Party.....




KenDckey -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 8:51:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Where has that happened, and remember, LEOs are partially paid by Fed, and that is just red state welfare.

Now, since the LEO would know where all the illegals are, why aren't we seeing state and local LEOs arresting the corporation officers and management and supervisors that hire them? Thats criminal, the illegal aliens are simply civil law breakers.

You know why, I know why, we all know why. Not a good use of money and resources to go after the illegals, go after the ones that hire them.

Let's start with Arizona


Be ironic if not amusing, to find those same corporations and companies that hired the illegal immigrants have been heavily supporting the Republican/Tea Party.....

I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about going after companies that hired law breakers. Not whom contributed to whom. Make up my mind.

AZ got sued by the fed for it's enforcement efforts and won/lost some but the Fed's don't seem to be enforcing their laws. DOL has rules against hiring these law breakers and don't enforce them.




joether -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 9:12:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about going after companies that hired law breakers. Not whom contributed to whom. Make up my mind.


The President when he came to office started by sending federal lawyers to perform 'surprise inspections' of the books of companies suspected of hiring illegal immigrants in the first place. Had a dramatic effect in that many of those companies removed anyone even suspected of being here illegally. The result was less illegal immigrants finding work in the United States and leaving the country. Something not often reported on the likes of FOX News...

But looking into those books, finding which companies hire the illegal immigrants, establishing who gave the 'ok', then asking why the person that hired them is still employed with the company. So the person fired is not just the one doing the actual hiring, but the person(s) that hire that person as well. You'll find such scrutiny well tend to lowers people's desires to hire the 'less than scrupulous' types.

Finding out if any of those same entities have contributed to the Republican/Tea Party would force those same politicians to explain why they are taking money from companies known to break the law. Are they taking money from the drug cartels along that border as well?

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
AZ got sued by the fed for it's enforcement efforts and won/lost some but the Fed's don't seem to be enforcing their laws. DOL has rules against hiring these law breakers and don't enforce them.


If you listen to conservative media propaganda machines, the Federals are not doing anything to help. In this case, I would suggest you look critically at the source of the information and what their political motivation is in making the US Government look bad. From many other sources, it seems the federal agents are doing a 'fair to good' level. Not excellent or remarkable; improvements to training, equipment and methods can always be examined and improved upon.

I'm open to the idea of improving the border between the USA and Mexico. But I want something in return. I'm willing to deal, but those in those states are not. They are demanding something, but will accept no compromises to get what they demand. How does spending money there, benefit those in my state? Now, if it took enhanced border security (to which those in those states demand) to get something like the Kennedy-McCain Immigration bill of 2007; I'd be up for it. The whole issue of 'amnesty for illegals' is a total political smoke screen preventing those that say that bullshit, from getting what they want.




Musicmystery -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 9:19:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey


AZ got sued by the fed for it's enforcement efforts

AZ got sued for breaking other laws in the process.




mnottertail -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 9:22:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Where has that happened, and remember, LEOs are partially paid by Fed, and that is just red state welfare.

Now, since the LEO would know where all the illegals are, why aren't we seeing state and local LEOs arresting the corporation officers and management and supervisors that hire them? Thats criminal, the illegal aliens are simply civil law breakers.

You know why, I know why, we all know why. Not a good use of money and resources to go after the illegals, go after the ones that hire them.




Let's start with Arizona


Nope, lets not start with your epic fail. What employers were incarcerated and turned over to ICE for fines by the LEOs? Answer, ZERO.





Musicmystery -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 9:22:52 AM)

quote:

Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security


They get it fine. They can't run on their record of doing nothing, their polling is in the toilet, and the public has tired of their typical wedge issues. They know they can't win elections without independents, and they believe wedge issues bring them these votes.

Then there's the rank and file that believes anything their masters tell them.




KenDckey -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 9:28:42 AM)

Let's see. According to government record there are approximately 309 million people in the US (US census records) and the DOJ said that there were approximately 11 million law breakers (US Law) immigrants in the us. If my math isn't completly wrong (I am getting on in age you know) that makes approximately 3% of our population law breakers on just immigration law. The fed, when they find them doesn't detain them for the most part, but gives them letters and sends them on their way with a future court date that usually they don't make (ICE). Probably the only way out of this mess is for Obama to grant pardons to all 11 million give or take law breakers. It would be interesting to see what Congress would do with that.




Musicmystery -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 9:38:48 AM)

Alternatively, Congress could fucking fund agencies so that they could do their jobs instead of having backlogs of years and even decades in the case of immigration law.





mnottertail -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 9:44:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Alternatively, Congress could fucking fund agencies so that they could do their jobs instead of having backlogs of years and even decades in the case of immigration law.




And in addition, set the law stronger against employers of illegal aliens and back presidential policies on going after the employers.





jlf1961 -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 3:44:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Recently, Gov. Rick Perry invited the President to the border to see what is happening in his state.
That if the border was a real issue, Texas, like the other states could simply call up their national guards to patrol the border. If they need US Military soldiers patrolling that border, it must be because those state troops are to stupid and dimwitted to do perform the task, right? No, its because those conservatives want the Americans in the other forty-six states to pay for it, so they don't have to have their taxes raised. Why should people in other states pay for something they will not benefit from directly? Massachusetts were I live, is far from that border; what would I and my fellow citizens gain by giving tax dollars to those states? The ones that are stonewalling the stuff I and others want accomplished in government?
But here is were conservatives just do not 'get it' on border security....
They could easily get what they want right now, *IF* they simply compromise with the President and Democrats on an abundant amount of issues. They'd have awesome border security by the end of the year if not the month, if they came forward with many good improvements on the ACA for example. Or a generous infrastructure improvement and building. Or even supporting a good immigration plan that Democrats want.
But, they don't, because that would be an intelligent way of solving a problem. And as seen in the Republican House on its second straight year of being 'useless to the American people' (i.e. the 2nd least productive Congress); being stupid, foolish, and dogmatic doesn't seem to be doing them any favors.


Right, and when a State pushes to use LEO to enforce Federal immigration law, the Left still opposes that, too.

Make up your mind, Joether. Do you want States to enforce immigration law or not?


Oh? They cant hire more police officers to police the border? Turning those they find in violation over to the feds for processing? Because they do that already, if you haven't been following all these years. So 'yes', why cant they up their own damn taxes and solve the problem? Why should it be someone's else's problem? Last I checked, the largest unguarded border in the world is the USA/Canada border, and they don't seem to have a problem with illegal immigrants.

If there was an illegal immigrantion problem in my state, the citizens would hire more law enforcement in a show of 'good faith' before asking other Americans in other states to chip in. But then, we are Taxachusetts, not 'Oh I don't want to pay another penny in taxes' Texas.


Let us look at that one point first, Texas has an expected budget deficit of 340 billion dollars this year, so where is the money going to come from to pay these new law enforcement officers?

Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming have no state income tax, all have budget deficits, and every state save those with balanced budget requirements in their constitutions have budget deficits.

Really, you want to put that argument up, no illegals from Canada?

First, going north from Canada there is no country, unless you continue south from the pole to Russia, and I really dont see a bunch of illegal aliens from Siberia crossing the Arctic Ocean and the north pole to get to Canada and then the US.

With few exceptions, every country south of the US is a third world country. The majority of people live in housing we would not put a dog in. So they head north to the US.

Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming have no state income tax, all have budget deficits, and every state save those with balanced budget requirements in their constitutions have budget deficits.

Now, I am going to shock the hell out of you, are you ready?

It is the responsibility of the Federal to secure the borders, not the state's. If a local cop arrests a person that happens to be here illegally, they are allowed by law to notify INS, they cannot transport the illegal to an INS holding center, nor can they hold the illegal after bail has been posted for INS to pickup, if the judge denies bail, then it is not a problem, IF there is room in an INS holding facility, and there are agents available to pick them up.

Currently, INS holding centers are over crowded, and thanks to some wise guy putting Cuban Refugees in federal prisons to await processing in the 70's, if there is no room to hold illegal aliens, well they can, until jack asses start filling lawsuits.

So to help the problem, the conservatives and liberals funded this fence along the southern border, some of it is wall, some wire, some steel and all easy to go over, under, or through.

Then there is this little problem, only the Federal government can call up the National Guard to patrol the border, because it is an international border, and to do that, Congress has to approve, which costs federal tax dollars, because it is a Federal problem.

Now, you could have an amendment to the Constitution passed that would allow the border states to police the borders, which would be cool with most conservatives, however, liberals would scream bloody murder about it.

Now, if we were to pull every American Service person out of Afghanistan and put them patrolling the border,it would save a few hundred billion dollars.

Then there is the last option.

Deputize all the members of private militias that liberals don't trust cause they are gun owning lunatics, and have them patrol the border. Have those men and women pulled into the state defense forces (Constitutionally Allowed) and then you just have to pay them a flat fee per day to patrol the border. The lunatic gun owners get to chase down and detain illegals legally, liberals can scream and file lawsuits.

Now the bonus is that we have untrained people performing a federal law enforcement function, which means the Federal Government can get sued left and right.

Now as a gun loving and owning lunatic that happens to belong to the Texas State Militia, I kinda like the deputize the militia lunatics option, that way when the drug smugglers and coyotes (people smugglers) start shooting, then all of us gon owning lunatics can use up ammo we have stock piled.




MercTech -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 5:39:54 PM)

And a good question is how do illegal immigrants file income tax returns and get refunds?
Yes, they actually do.





Musicmystery -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 7:27:54 PM)

H & R Block?




MrRodgers -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 7:52:01 PM)

Well the right could claim they are all terrorists and support a war to take over say Mexico for starters...end of problem.

BTW, I am not so sure it is conservatives that are the problem, it's more today's repubs than conservatives.

Real conservatives are much more pragmatic and work for a solution rather than just sit back and whine at the current admin.




Sanity -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 7:58:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Well the right could claim they are all terrorists and support a war to take over say Mexico for starters...end of problem.

BTW, I am not so sure it is conservatives that are the problem, it's more today's repubs than conservatives.

Real conservatives are much more pragmatic and work for a solution rather than just sit back and whine at the current admin.


I see you're avoiding the reality that practically EVERYONE is complaining about this dishonest, lazy, corrupt, incompetent, low-down, lying racist shit bag currently occupying the White House




cloudboy -> RE: Conservatives just dont 'get it' on Border Security (7/3/2014 8:10:26 PM)


The Tea Partiers are angry anarchists masquerading as Patriots. I can't think of one good policy they've proposed.




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.711914E-02