RE: To sub men: please explain "service" housework fetish

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: To sub men: please explain "service" housework fetish

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: To sub men: please explain "service" housework fetish

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: To sub men: please explain "service" hous... - 7/18/2014 1:49:57 PM

FieryOpal

Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

Then, of course, what floats other people's boats doesn't take the wind out of my sail.

I am pretty sure that if you floated someones boat your sails would have favorable winds.

I take it you have a boat that floats, then. Or else one that sails.

ETA: You or one of your service sub buddies, that is. :p

< Message edited by FieryOpal -- 7/18/2014 1:52:12 PM >

_____________________________

Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu
There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau

(in reply to thompsonx)

Profile

Post #: 41

RE: To sub men: please explain "service" hous... - 7/19/2014 10:01:51 AM

crwlon4

Posts: 47
Joined: 1/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

and the assumptions you appear to be making about LadyMarieP's relationships are a reach.

Her post are pretty clear that it is "her way or the highway" That she expects service yet brings nothing to the table except her dirty dishes and her sore feet. What did I miss?

The way I read it, I didn't see her comment as the end game.

I have never entered a D/s relationship "looking" for sex. So there is at least one.

I believe we are both on a sexually explicit website. That is prima-facia evidence that you are looking for sexunless you are some sort of vice cop looking to get lucky when someone sticks their foot in their mouth.

Objection: Speculation. I feel like you are committing a fallacy of the converse with your statement and I functionally disagree. The last three years I have been on this site I haven't been looking for anything, as a matter of fact.
To be clear before this turns into something else entirely, I do agree that there is such a thing as a no-strings sub.

< Message edited by crwlon4 -- 7/19/2014 10:02:53 AM >

(in reply to thompsonx)

Profile

Post #: 42

RE: To sub men: please explain "service" hous... - 7/19/2014 10:16:51 AM

LadyMariaP

Posts: 7
Joined: 4/3/2013
Status: offline

While its fun to have people arguing over me, i think this thread should have a "Dont Feed the Trolls" sign affixed to it at this point :)

(in reply to crwlon4)

Profile

Post #: 43

RE: To sub men: please explain "service" hous... - 7/19/2014 10:59:57 AM

crwlon4

Posts: 47
Joined: 1/27/2008
Status: offline

Check, sorry.

(in reply to LadyMariaP)

Profile

Post #: 44

RE: To sub men: please explain "service" hous... - 7/19/2014 12:12:51 PM

FieryOpal

Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013
From: Maryland
Status: offline

(Btw crwlon4, LMP wasn't referring to you, I don't believe.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: crwlon4

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Her post are pretty clear that it is "her way or the highway" That she expects service yet brings nothing to the table except her dirty dishes and her sore feet. What did I miss?

The way I read it, I didn't see her comment as the end game.
<snip>
... I do agree that there is such a thing as a no-strings sub.

See, therein lies the problem. It isn't so much a sub/Domme thing as it is the classic m/f misunderstanding that NO MEANS NO. NO doesn't mean maybe, or we'll see what happens.

If a Domme is saying, I'm looking for a non-sexual service sub, with no BDSM play, then this IS the end game.
(Naturally, this would be a Domme not named FieryOpal.

)
A male (or possibly female) sub hoping that his fine ass will somehow sway her to find him attractive is mere fantasy--a huge longshot.

There's a female service slave who doesn't want a sexual relationship with her Master. And this is what they agreed upon, no sex. True story.
If one day he changes his mind and starts thinking he is entitled to demand sex from her, she is ambivalent.
Oh, it all depends on her mood, her attraction level, whether she's on her period, etc., etc. Because she keeps her option open for being "forced."
IMO, she doesn't want to take responsibility for her own sexuality, nor to take enjoyment in having sexual gratification for herself.
In this particular case, this Master would be in a world of trouble with this type of submissive. She could arbitrarily decide that she had been sexually and/or physically assaulted and have him arrested.

There may be no-strings subs, but there needs to be no hidden agenda. Anything less than that is dishonest.

[Edited for grammar]

< Message edited by FieryOpal -- 7/19/2014 12:32:18 PM >

_____________________________

Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu
There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau

(in reply to crwlon4)

Profile

Post #: 45

RE: To sub men: please explain "service" hous... - 7/20/2014 9:38:46 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal
I take it you have a boat that floats, then. Or else one that sails.

My boat both floats and sails...and reaches speeds in excess of 50mph...well the one with wheels does.

(in reply to FieryOpal)

Profile

Post #: 46

RE: To sub men: please explain "service" hous... - 7/20/2014 3:00:40 PM

FieryOpal

Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

My boat both floats and sails...and reaches speeds in excess of 50mph...well the one with wheels does.

Would that be the Jag or the Peugeot, yanno, with the fully reclining seats and no hump in the middle?

_____________________________

Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu
There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau

(in reply to thompsonx)

Profile

Post #: 47