Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 8:00:09 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline 		They passed it, now the superior leadership and craftsmanship that went into drafting this law is slowly being revealed

(Thats sarcasm for those of you who are far left professors, or who live in Canada)

Fed appeals court panel says most Obamacare subsidies illegal

A potential death blow to Obamacare

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 8:16:56 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		L.O.L.




_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 8:47:58 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
They passed it, now the superior leadership and craftsmanship that went into drafting this law is slowly being revealed
(Thats sarcasm for those of you who are far left professors, or who live in Canada)
Fed appeals court panel says most Obamacare subsidies illegal
A potential death blow to Obamacare


No. There is an easy fix for that. If they have to, they'll pass something that includes a change to the language allowing subsidies to go to those who sign up for Federally run, or state run exchanges.

You think the GOP won't go along with some popular bill that the amendment gets added to? This stuff isn't going anywhere.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 9:29:37 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline 		Yeah, you're right. The GOP wants nothing more than to jump on board the very popular Obamacare bandwagon

(That's more sarcasm for you Professors & Canadians btw)

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 9:36:27 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Well, your sarcasm falls flat, as usual, what with some 74% of republicans positively masturbatory over obamacare now.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 9:38:32 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Yeah, you're right. The GOP wants nothing more than to jump on board the very popular Obamacare bandwagon
(That's more sarcasm for you Professors & Canadians btw)


They'll voice opposition, no doubt. They won't really get crazy with it, though. Having an otherwise popular bill will give them cover with constituents, too. Sadly, establishment Republicans aren't about reducing the size and scope of the Federal government, overall. They just want to limit the size and scope of the Federal government for non-Republican ideas.

Most Republicans didn't have as huge an issue with Bush 43's deficits as they do with Obama's. Even if they opposed the increased spending, they still toed the party line. When push comes to shove, they'll capitulate.

And they'll still be chastised as obstructionists and non-compromisers.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 9:58:30 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		http://www.motherjones.com/documents/1225667-king-usca4-20140722

Already struck down on appeal.



The ONutsackers-in-ineptitude have been ridiculed for slobbering imbecility again!

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 7/22/2014 10:00:06 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 10:14:23 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline 		Mmm hmm

Barack Obama can count on all the friends he has worked so hard to make on the right side of the aisle to pull his bloated Obamacare redistribution scheme out of the fire...

I tell you what

Because I like you I'm gonna do you a huge personnel favor

How would you like to buy a solid gold bridge unbelievably cheap







< Message edited by Sanity -- 7/22/2014 10:16:08 AM >

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 10:15:02 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		Wow. Sanity didn't even get to cum.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 10:55:44 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Mmm hmm
Barack Obama can count on all the friends he has worked so hard to make on the right side of the aisle to pull his bloated Obamacare redistribution scheme out of the fire...
I tell you what
Because I like you I'm gonna do you a huge personnel favor
How would you like to buy a solid gold bridge unbelievably cheap


You have nothing to back your assertion, Sanity. What makes you think they won't pass the language correcting the issue?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 11:09:38 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		No need -- the ruling has already been overturned, so the language is fine.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 11:38:14 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
No need -- the ruling has already been overturned, so the language is fine.


Unless it continues on to the SCOTUS and gets denied Constitutionality. Plus, the need won't be there until the final word is given, which may or may not be the case now.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 11:45:00 AM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Wow. Sanity didn't even get to cum.

The gene pool can breathe a sigh of relief.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 11:59:21 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Why is collarspaces own "bungler in chief" selling off his dental work?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 12:01:07 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri


You have nothing to back your assertion, Sanity. What makes you think they won't pass the language correcting the issue?



You're the one making the insane claim that Republicans are willing and eager to save Obama's bungled legacy law. How many times have they voted to repeal it now?

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 12:02:21 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

They passed it, now the superior leadership and craftsmanship that went into drafting this law is slowly being revealed

(Thats sarcasm for those of you who are far left professors, or who live in Canada)

Fed appeals court panel says most Obamacare subsidies illegal

A potential death blow to Obamacare

Shortly after this dumbass sure to be reversed ruling was issued the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the other way making it the third appeals court to rule that the federal exchanges were legal.
http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/king_usca4_20140722.pdf

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 12:05:16 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

No need -- the ruling has already been overturned, so the language is fine.

No. that was a ruling by a different circuit on a different case.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 12:17:36 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
No need -- the ruling has already been overturned, so the language is fine.


Unless it continues on to the SCOTUS and gets denied Constitutionality. Plus, the need won't be there until the final word is given, which may or may not be the case now.



Considering the troll who you are replying to, are some pretty big words

You'll need to break it down for him a lot better than that

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 12:22:24 PM   
SubtleMentor


Posts: 11
Joined: 5/24/2014
Status: offline 		Meanwhile there has been a net increase of 20m insured in the few short months the act as been in place. There would be a lot more if the Republican governors would snap out of their ideological haze.

Even better, the shift from volume reimbursement to value reimbursement is already making health care in America much better.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again - 7/22/2014 1:34:49 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
You have nothing to back your assertion, Sanity. What makes you think they won't pass the language correcting the issue?

You're the one making the insane claim that Republicans are willing and eager to save Obama's bungled legacy law. How many times have they voted to repeal it now?


As many times as they knew it wasn't going to go any further than their vote.

How many times have the Republicans stood up to Obama only to, in the end, back down? I think their capitulation rate would still be higher than the MLB all-time single season batting average record.






_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The Bungler-In-Chief Strikes Again Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094