RE: Porn for women. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


FieryOpal -> RE: Porn for women. (7/26/2014 7:09:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

I don't know about that. I can honestly say that when I am with my male friends, kink and nilla alike, we talk about everything (and I mean everything) except the male member. Not that we shy away from the subject on sexual confusion grounds, but hetro guys just aren't wired to talk about things like that. I mean we don't sit around the bar saying things like, "Do you think his ass looks good in those jeans" or "I can totally see his nipples in that shirt, that slut". Guys just don't talk that kind of sex with each other, especially penises

If they're straight, I would hope not. [;)]




Darkfeather -> RE: Porn for women. (7/26/2014 8:30:09 PM)

hey, I am one selfish basterd. As far as I am concerned, my penis in in the conversation is one penis too many, err, you know what I mean [8D]




catize -> RE: Porn for women. (7/27/2014 4:28:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal


quote:

ORIGINAL: catize

I prefer erotica to porn.
I find any porn disappointing, I prefer my own imagination, so, no, I would never waste any money on it. Although there are times I believe I could make some money writing it!

Don't stop writing your heart out. There's always a demand for better quality erotica, and this should come from a much-needed woman's perspective.

I had undertaken writing a few short stories about 20 years ago, before there was a Literotica or any of that, but I couldn't stop rewriting and/or starting from scratch all over again.
Insipid Anaïs Nin was my anti-role model of what kind of stuff not to write. (To this day, I start to cringe whenever I hear or see the words: languid, languidly, languish, bijou...) [>:]

Best of luck with your literary endeavors! [:)]

Thanks for the encouragement! The thing about Anais Nin was she wrote a lot of her stuff for male clients who paid her to write their fantasies-- lesson there is write for yourself!




thompsonx -> RE: Porn for women. (7/27/2014 7:52:35 AM)


ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

Evidently they do...I suspect men like to make locker room-ish comparisons up close without having to NOT appear that they are sneaking a peek.


Why do you suspect that?



(Admit it, you guys want to get a close-up view of just about anything and everything you can.)

Now that you have confirmed your suspicions with your own opinions where do we go from here?

Not only that, I suspect that it's wishful thinking on men's parts that we women are just as interested (read as "cock-centric") in the state of their members as they themselves are in their own. Like we really care how heavy your (plural) balls are at any given moment. [8D]

The only women who would care about that would be brazen hussys..."brazen hussydom" being paramount on my list of necessary attributes in a lady.




GotSteel -> RE: Porn for women. (7/27/2014 9:04:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven
If there was to be a kind of porn specifically aimed at women, what would you women want to see in it?


I thought it already existed in the form of cheesy romance novels.




FieryOpal -> RE: Porn for women. (7/27/2014 11:15:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

Evidently they do...I suspect men like to make locker room-ish comparisons up close without having to NOT appear that they are sneaking a peek.

Why do you suspect that?

Lots of second-hand information, usually when guys joke about this in mixed company.
Sorry but I can't claim any first-hand knowledge of this; however, with the ladies we take great pains to act natural and avert our glances. Unless we're with our girlfriends, then we act very natural like our nudity is no biggie.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

(Admit it, you guys want to get a close-up view of just about anything and everything you can.)

Now that you have confirmed your suspicions with your own opinions where do we go from here?

I take it this means no admission is forthcoming. [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

Not only that, I suspect that it's wishful thinking on men's parts that we women are just as interested (read as "cock-centric") in the state of their members as they themselves are in their own. Like we really care how heavy your (plural) balls are at any given moment. [8D]

The only women who would care about that would be brazen hussys..."brazen hussydom" being paramount on my list of necessary attributes in a lady.

Hey-y-y...Did you just call me a brazen hussy? [;)]




thompsonx -> RE: Porn for women. (7/27/2014 2:51:04 PM)


ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

Hey-y-y...Did you just call me a brazen hussy? [;)]


Your level of purient interest in the weight/mass of my balls is unknown to me so I would have to plead ignorance in the first degree.
Would you be so kind as to disabuse me of my ignorance?





FieryOpal -> RE: Porn for women. (7/27/2014 3:12:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

Hey-y-y...Did you just call me a brazen hussy? [;)]

Your level of purient interest in the weight/mass of my balls is unknown to me so I would have to plead ignorance in the first degree.
Would you be so kind as to disabuse me of my ignorance?


That level of interest would be Zero. Women who aren't trying to get pregnant aren't the least bit interested in those kinds of things.
(Maybe those into CBT would be, as an exception to the rule.)

Feel disabused yet? [8D]




thompsonx -> RE: Porn for women. (7/27/2014 8:24:47 PM)

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

Hey-y-y...Did you just call me a brazen hussy? [;)]

Your level of purient interest in the weight/mass of my balls is unknown to me so I would have to plead ignorance in the first degree.
Would you be so kind as to disabuse me of my ignorance?


That level of interest would be Zero. Women who aren't trying to get pregnant aren't the least bit interested in those kinds of things.


I am sure that there myriad points that might pique a womans interest in the mass of a man's testicles besides cbt or an interest in motherhood.


(Maybe those into CBT would be, as an exception to the rule.)

Feel disabused yet? [8D]


Nope[:(]




FieryOpal -> RE: Porn for women. (7/27/2014 11:08:05 PM)

[Fixed quote boxes]
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal
Hey-y-y...Did you just call me a brazen hussy? [;)]

Your level of purient interest in the weight/mass of my balls is unknown to me so I would have to plead ignorance in the first degree.
Would you be so kind as to disabuse me of my ignorance?


That level of interest would be Zero. Women who aren't trying to get pregnant aren't the least bit interested in those kinds of things.
(Maybe those into CBT would be, as an exception to the rule.)

I am sure that there myriad points that might pique a womans interest in the mass of a man's testicles besides cbt or an interest in motherhood.

Feel disabused yet? [8D]

Nope[:(]

Dream on [sm=m23.gif] ... I believe this is what is commonly known as male wishful thinking.




thompsonx -> RE: Porn for women. (7/28/2014 7:21:32 AM)


ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

Dream on [sm=m23.gif] ... I believe this is what is commonly known as male wishful thinking.


Guilty as charged[:(]




AAkasha -> RE: Porn for women. (7/30/2014 3:28:07 PM)



Well, not sure where this came from. Obscure, but hot.

Complete with helpless but sweet looking man, panties used as gag, control over orgasm. What's not to love?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnFHzkG25ao


Akasha




SpyUnderCover -> RE: Porn for women. (8/1/2014 12:57:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha



Well, not sure where this came from. Obscure, but hot.

Complete with helpless but sweet looking man, panties used as gag, control over orgasm. What's not to love?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnFHzkG25ao


Akasha

Oooh...that is pretty hot!

Spy




PeonForHer -> RE: Porn for women. (8/1/2014 3:25:42 PM)

quote:

What's not to love?


... That they couldn't get Hotlips Houlihan and had to get a lookalike instead.




PeonForHer -> RE: Porn for women. (8/1/2014 3:28:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha



Well, not sure where this came from. Obscure, but hot.

Complete with helpless but sweet looking man, panties used as gag, control over orgasm. What's not to love?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnFHzkG25ao


Akasha



I know your tastes, A. You will thank me greatly after looking at this link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmHb6o02snc

ETA: Emmanuelle Beart as a femdom. Wow, did the producers read my mind!





ResidentSadist -> RE: Porn for women. (8/2/2014 2:44:22 AM)

.

[image]local://upfiles/390966/C87892C4736C47FC92A2BAD2870E1B50.jpg[/image]




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875