BamaD -> RE: Bloomberg anti-gun ad backfires (8/1/2014 11:21:38 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic By the way.....its great[X(][:'(] that the gun rights people missed the whole point of the ad...which is intended to show the dangers of guns in the hands of domestic abusers,. No, its you who misses the point Again, a man typically doesn't need a gun to do serious harm to a woman, whereas women could often use some help defending themselves while under assault If leftists are successful in their war on women, womens best method of defense will be taken away from them The woman in the ad had no chance with a gun she would have had some chance. Yea, she could have shot him after he kicked the door down and ended it right there. But the point about domestic abusers is valid. They shouldn't have guns. Unfortunately people don't always follow the law so some people who shouldn't have guns still carry them. Not sure what Lucy's point was with the drive by. I don't think anyone suggested having a gun would protect you from that kind of shit. It sure as fuck couldn't have helped the 8 year old who was shot while he was home sleeping in bed the other night. Although if someone had had one when the 2 year old was killed, then a fuckwad walked up to her and shot her in the head might have been the one killed that night. But they didn't so we will never know. And amazingly enough, while I have talked to all kinds of people of these incidents, none of them brought up gun control as a possible answer. They are too busy trying to find out why people in the area are so angry that they feel the only solution is to go out and kill someone. They don't seem to be blaming the guns at all. Just the assholes who are running around using them. What you may have been alluding to is that anyone convicted of domestic abuse cannot legally have a firearm so it seems that her first tale is an example of the total failure of gun control.
|
|
|
|