Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/4/2014 6:40:59 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


I read today that Obama has only vetoed two bills this session.

As far as I know he's never vetoed any bills.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/4/2014 7:02:54 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
If the IRS had targeted leftists under Bush, or Bush had been caught sneaking in illegal Republican voters that would harm the country as a whole, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc, the leftist riots would make the time they assaulted the old folks attending the Minneapolis RNC convention look like a cakewalk

Once again, without their hypocrisy leftists would have nuthin'

You mean like when the IRS did target leftists.
http://articles.latimes.com/2006/sep/16/local/me-allsaints16


You really believe that the IRS making one admittedly "liberal" activist church justify their tax exempt status is in the same league as Obamas IRS admittedly systematically auditing and harrassing every group that had “tea party” or “patriot” in their names?

I don't care how dishonest people say you are ken, you're even worse than that.





< Message edited by Sanity -- 8/4/2014 7:08:27 PM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/4/2014 7:04:58 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
If the IRS had targeted leftists under Bush, or Bush had been caught sneaking in illegal Republican voters that would harm the country as a whole, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc, the leftist riots would make the time they assaulted the old folks attending the Minneapolis RNC convention look like a cakewalk
Once again, without their hypocrisy leftists would have nuthin'

You mean like when the IRS did target leftists.
http://articles.latimes.com/2006/sep/16/local/me-allsaints16


Seriously? That's your proof?!? You're trotting out an already-exempt organization that may have crossed the law and got investigated, against groups applying for exemption whose only "suspect" activity is listing "tea party,""patriot," et. al. in their submission forms?!? Did the Church lost it's exemption while being investigated?

http://dev.ombwatch.org/node/3608
    quote:

    The IRS concluded that All Saints Church violated the ban, while the NAACP did not. In a warning letter to the church, the IRS wrote that All Saints had committed political intervention, but that no further action would be taken. Both organizations retain their nonprofit tax exempt status.


So, they were determined to have crossed the line, but there were no sanctions?

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/sep/24/local/me-allsaints24
    quote:

    One of Southern California's largest and most liberal congregations, All Saints came under IRS scrutiny after a sermon two days before the 2004 presidential election by a guest speaker, the Rev. George F. Regas. In his sermon, Regas, the church's former rector, imagined Jesus participating in a political debate with then-presidential candidates George W. Bush and John F. Kerry.

    Regas did not endorse either candidate, saying that "good people of profound faith" could support either one. But he strongly criticized the war in Iraq and said that Jesus would have told Bush that his preemptive war strategy in Iraq "has led to disaster."

    A letter from the IRS arrived in June 2005 stating that the church's tax-exempt status was in jeopardy. Federal law prohibits tax-exempt organizations, including churches, from intervening in political campaigns and elections.

    The letter said the agency's concerns were based on a Nov. 1, 2004, article in the Los Angeles Times, which included three paragraphs about Regas' sermon in a lengthy national roundup of rhetoric from the pulpit on the Sunday before the election.

    In its latest letter to All Saints, dated Sept. 10, the IRS said the church continues to qualify for tax-exempt status, but said that Regas' sermon did amount to intervention in the 2004 presidential race. The letter offered no details or explanation for either conclusion.


The IRS "targeted" a liberal church 8 months after finding out about the possible infraction (which they found to be not legal under the rules), when the infraction occurred 2 days before an election (also 8 months prior to the "targetting"), and still didn't take any action?

That's hardly the same situation, Ken.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/4/2014 8:22:39 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
If the IRS had targeted leftists under Bush, or Bush had been caught sneaking in illegal Republican voters that would harm the country as a whole, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc, the leftist riots would make the time they assaulted the old folks attending the Minneapolis RNC convention look like a cakewalk
Once again, without their hypocrisy leftists would have nuthin'

You mean like when the IRS did target leftists.
http://articles.latimes.com/2006/sep/16/local/me-allsaints16


Seriously? That's your proof?!? You're trotting out an already-exempt organization that may have crossed the law and got investigated, against groups applying for exemption whose only "suspect" activity is listing "tea party,""patriot," et. al. in their submission forms?!? Did the Church lost it's exemption while being investigated?

http://dev.ombwatch.org/node/3608
    quote:

    The IRS concluded that All Saints Church violated the ban, while the NAACP did not. In a warning letter to the church, the IRS wrote that All Saints had committed political intervention, but that no further action would be taken. Both organizations retain their nonprofit tax exempt status.


So, they were determined to have crossed the line, but there were no sanctions?

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/sep/24/local/me-allsaints24
    quote:

    One of Southern California's largest and most liberal congregations, All Saints came under IRS scrutiny after a sermon two days before the 2004 presidential election by a guest speaker, the Rev. George F. Regas. In his sermon, Regas, the church's former rector, imagined Jesus participating in a political debate with then-presidential candidates George W. Bush and John F. Kerry.

    Regas did not endorse either candidate, saying that "good people of profound faith" could support either one. But he strongly criticized the war in Iraq and said that Jesus would have told Bush that his preemptive war strategy in Iraq "has led to disaster."

    A letter from the IRS arrived in June 2005 stating that the church's tax-exempt status was in jeopardy. Federal law prohibits tax-exempt organizations, including churches, from intervening in political campaigns and elections.

    The letter said the agency's concerns were based on a Nov. 1, 2004, article in the Los Angeles Times, which included three paragraphs about Regas' sermon in a lengthy national roundup of rhetoric from the pulpit on the Sunday before the election.

    In its latest letter to All Saints, dated Sept. 10, the IRS said the church continues to qualify for tax-exempt status, but said that Regas' sermon did amount to intervention in the 2004 presidential race. The letter offered no details or explanation for either conclusion.



The IRS "targeted" a liberal church 8 months after finding out about the possible infraction (which they found to be not legal under the rules), when the infraction occurred 2 days before an election (also 8 months prior to the "targetting"), and still didn't take any action?

That's hardly the same situation, Ken.

Do you know how many conservative churches do the same thing and never got even a tiny whiff from the IRS?

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/4/2014 8:41:35 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Do you know how many conservative churches do the same thing and never got even a tiny whiff from the IRS?


Nope. You?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/4/2014 9:15:34 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
Obama's IRS targeted conservative Christian churches: news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/073114-711290-irs-deal-with-atheists
There's also Obama's IRS targeting a 180 year old Baptist newspaper Called the Biblical Recorder and also, they went after Samaritans Purse: thegatewaypundit.com/2013/06

Now then, if they're "politicking", then they should be gone after. But what was asked was "have conservative churches been targeted"?

< Message edited by CreativeDominant -- 8/4/2014 9:46:33 PM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 6:58:04 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Obama's IRS targeted conservative Christian churches: news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/073114-711290-irs-deal-with-atheists
There's also Obama's IRS targeting a 180 year old Baptist newspaper Called the Biblical Recorder and also, they went after Samaritans Purse: thegatewaypundit.com/2013/06

Now then, if they're "politicking", then they should be gone after. But what was asked was "have conservative churches been targeted"?

Neither of those links works. Some Googling didn't turn up the stories either just a bunch of scare mongering.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 9:17:51 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
I have yet to read of any deserving conservative organization being denied its tax exempt status. I have only read of delays and requests for more information. That's standard in a regulatory environment and delays happen for understaffed-underfunded agencies.

Conservatives are actually upset that out of state organizations couldn't pour more anonymous money into their local races -- while titillating that such donors can can hide behind terms like "Americans for Freedom."

While conservatives blather about Obama "not enforcing the immigration laws" they don't like it when the IRS tries enforce 501 laws by not giving political organizations 501(c)(3) status. Where's the conservative concern over this?

BTW: I am happy to change out the term "conservative" here for "right wing operatives" or "fox news idiots."

< Message edited by cloudboy -- 8/5/2014 9:25:35 AM >

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 9:19:13 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
My Google must be better than yours then. All I did was Google IRS targeting of churches. It brought up articles about the IRS going after left and right churches.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 9:46:06 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

I have yet to read of any deserving conservative organization being denied its tax exempt status. I have only read of delays and requests for more information. That's standard in a regulatory environment and delays happen for understaffed-underfunded agencies.

Conservatives are actually upset that out of state organizations couldn't pour more anonymous money into their local races -- while titillating that such donors can can hide behind terms like "Americans for Freedom."

While conservatives blather about Obama "not enforcing the immigration laws" they don't like it when the IRS tries enforce 501 laws by not giving political organizations 501(c)(3) status. Where's the conservative concern over this?

BTW: I am happy to change out the term "conservative" here for "right wing operatives" or "fox news idiots."

No, they were held in limbo till the election was over.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 9:50:17 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I thought those delays were because of due diligence being executed. After all, we all want these to conform to the law, we want everyone to be law abiding, don't we?

And did it stop them from doing what they were doing while waiting on the approval? No, its a tax status, not a license to steal (well, actually it is).

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 10:35:29 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

My Google must be better than yours then. All I did was Google IRS targeting of churches. It brought up articles about the IRS going after left and right churches.

Some more searching found an article about a very recently settled lawsuit but nothing about the IRS actually going after any churches.

The other article made claims but then failed o actually back them up.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 10:49:01 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
amazing deflection Sanity..well done!!! ignoring the shit congress has put on you in the past few weeks to complaining about the much hated IRS no matter what side of the aisle you prefer, or religion, colour or gender.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 11:38:02 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
The feeling of being persecuted trumps the facts of being persecuted. It's a ratings driver for Fox News and AM radio while agitating the base. If you flash back to when this story first broke, there was no more hopeful poster than the Heretic pining for a special prosecutor and an impeachment torpedo to fire at the White House. The whole thing just fizzed out.

< Message edited by cloudboy -- 8/5/2014 11:40:53 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 12:01:40 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

My Google must be better than yours then. All I did was Google IRS targeting of churches. It brought up articles about the IRS going after left and right churches.


Your right and one of the first links is the one he claimed didn't turn up. Imagine that

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/073114-711290-the-irs-bullied-pulpit.htm

and oh look, there's the other one

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/06/confirmed-obama-irs-targeted-infiltrated-and-harassed-christian-churches/

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 1:54:03 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

My Google must be better than yours then. All I did was Google IRS targeting of churches. It brought up articles about the IRS going after left and right churches.


Your right and one of the first links is the one he claimed didn't turn up. Imagine that

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/073114-711290-the-irs-bullied-pulpit.htm

and oh look, there's the other one

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/06/confirmed-obama-irs-targeted-infiltrated-and-harassed-christian-churches/

Neither of which supports the claims he made despite your whine.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 - 8/5/2014 2:42:49 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

My Google must be better than yours then. All I did was Google IRS targeting of churches. It brought up articles about the IRS going after left and right churches.


Your right and one of the first links is the one he claimed didn't turn up. Imagine that

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/073114-711290-the-irs-bullied-pulpit.htm

and oh look, there's the other one

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/06/confirmed-obama-irs-targeted-infiltrated-and-harassed-christian-churches/

Neither of which supports the claims he made despite your whine.



I wasn't whining about anything so I am not sure why you felt the need to lie and say I did. I also didn't say they supported any claims made. I merely provided them because you seemed to be having a problem finding them yourself.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 57
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Congressional Dysfunction 101 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078