RE: Public Submission (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


FieryOpal -> RE: Public Submission (8/2/2014 11:24:16 PM)

This is such a personal subject, which only you can answer based on the D/s relationship dynamics you have with your Mistress.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiresdommes

I am certain this topic has been discussed prior to my joining and I am equally certain it varies by couple. However, I am curious how others deal with the power structure in public.

1. Are you in a TPE-Total Power Exchange dynamic? Because you state in your profile that you have "been in two 24/7 relationships."
2. What is the level of protocol you have mutually consented to? High, medium, low? She wants higher protocol in public than what was previously established, and you have the right to object to this rule change.

quote:

I was punished and told I needed to understand that ours is a lifestyle and not something limited to the sanctity of our house.

3. Why were you "punished"?
4. Had you and your Mistress agreed upon having punishment dynamics?
5. Do you view discipline and/or correction as punishment? Does your Mistress?
6. Were you disrespectful to your Mistress, in her opinion, and this is why she is insisting on a public acknowledgment on your part?
7. Your Mistress stressing that "ours is a lifestyle" signifies to me that you haven't fully accepted her ownership of you. Have you have been treating her like she is your kinky service Top?
8. You share a house together, so this is a live-in situation, which is what you meant by "24/7."
9. Is "sanctity" your word or hers? This is something a spouse or LTR SO would say.

quote:

As part of the new discipline I was told I should address her as Ma'am in public.

10. You are 50--how old is your Mistress? Only if you were much younger than her would it be remotely appropriate for you to address her as "Ma'am" in public, as in young enough to be her son or nephew.
Women younger than 30 generally bristle at being called the matronly "Ma'am" by a man old enough to be their father. You could get by with "Miss" with this age group.
A woman younger than you or middle-aged? Anything's possible, I suppose. If she's older than you, would she really want to go around advertising this fact?

DaddySatyr's terminology of "my lady" is endearing; you could say,"Yes, my Lady..." You could always whisper, "Yes, my Mistress" in her ear, or even better, "Your wish is my command" in an intimate manner, out of earshot of others.

quote:

I have always tried to be overly polite and a gentelman when we are out but I will admit that I don't like to advertise that I am sub to her. She feels I should be proud to have people know I am her sub. Just curious how others handle this.

She could call you "My pet" in public, and it wouldn't seem out of place in the slightest.
Yes, you should be proud she is your Mistress when you are in kink-friendly company. For her to lack common-sensical discretion would indicate immaturity, ego insecurity and/or being an inexperienced Dominant.

At a BDSM event or fetish party where it would be appropriate, if she wants you to be collared on a leash, wearing only a codpiece with your bare butt cheeks hanging out, would you have a problem with that? She should be proud to show you off, but only with your consent, not because you are afraid of displeasing her.
Because unless you set your boundaries and limits with her now, that'll be the next step or progression to a future "punishment" or to teach you a lesson in publicly showcasing your subbliness.




Admiresdommes -> RE: Public Submission (8/3/2014 11:22:58 AM)

Thank You for the very thoughtful comments. I will try to answer all of your questions. Yes this is my second 24/7 D/s relationship. We do live together. When the first ended, due mostly to a relocation but not exclusively, I dated vanilla. I quickly relaized that I found F/m far more fulfilling.

We are in a TPE and at home it is a total dynamic. I would say we are a very high protocol privately and have been a low protocol publicly. My first relationship was very vanilla publicly and she was fine with that. My current relationship is with someone more experienced although three years younger than me. While my first relationship began vanilla and transitioned to D/s this relationship has been D/s from day one as I was seeking a dominant partner. While I do enjoy the kink of the relationship I also believe that a D/s relationship is healthier in some ways. (A topic for another day)

When we first became involved I told her that I didn't know my limits with the exception that I am not into extreme pain or things like electric shock etc. Her preferred methods of physical discipline are spankings and corner time but she also will do things like silent treatment, taking away prviledges (like golf or playing basketball) and she does enjoy some feminization but that can also be fun. So to answer your question, I would say we have discussed punishment dynamics. I would say that most times correction comes first and if I repeat the offense then it might be followed with punishment for reinforcement. We recently had an incident with the dishes and she told me she didn't want me to do something a certain way anymore. I will follow her instructions but I also know if I don't there will be consequences.

She does have a daughter who knows of the dynamics of our relationship and she has a group of friends who live the lifestyle to varying degrees. Although her daughter has been around us I was still mortified the first time she came over and I was in the corner. So, I would not say our relationship has been purely private but I am comfortable around others who accept the lifestyle or participate in it. In my previous relationship I was put in some very embarrassing situations but alwaqys around people who were into D/s. I have attended fetish parties and have been naked on a leash.

I guess since I am stating more than I probably should I have also compromised in semi public. My Mistress is a former dancer and bought tickets for us to go to a ballet. I was and still am very athletic and have little interest in the ballet. I asked her to take a friend or her daughter. She said I would enjoy it. I told her I had no interest in seeing a bunch of guys in pink tights dancing on their toes. She was very upset with me and told me she would take someone else but she happened to find guys with nice bodies in tights very sexy. We have a workout room in my house. A couple days later she gave me a leotard and tights and told me I would be wearing it to workout. For presents I have since been given some others and she has made me wear that to workout in a hotel exercise room on a couple of occassions. While you might question if it crossed my limits I would answer by saying the affect it had on her was well worth it. She gets totally turned on for whatever reason and I getv rewarded.

Your 3rd question you asked why I was punished. We were out with a group of friends who are not openly aware of our dynamic but likely have drawn some conclusions. We had dinner and went to a bar afterwards. We sat at a table in one room and I went to the restroom. On my way back I ran into two of the guys we were with watching the baseball game at the bar. Rather than go back to the table i started talking to them and ended up watching the game. I did not return to the table for over an hour and a half. However, I could see the table and she could see me. Everyone seemed to be having a good time. When the game ended I walked back to the table. One of the guys said, "Do you want one more beer before we go?" I could tell she was upset so I asked, "Do you mind if I have one more?" She looked at me and in front of her friend she said, "Is that how you ask?" I became a little uncomfortable and saaid, "May I please have another beer?" She said, "No, you need a lesson in manners." I knew her friend overheard everything although she prentended not to. At that point we said goodbye and left. After a long night of soul searching that is why I bagan this thread.

I will whisper Mistress to her in public but only so the two of us can hear it. She likes to be called Ma'am and I have never questioned that. I hope I have answered all of your questions and not worn out my welcome. I certainly did not expect to go this in depth into my relationships. Thank you for reading this and your reply.







FieryOpal -> RE: Public Submission (8/3/2014 4:13:50 PM)

Hey, I didn't want to leave you hanging there, and it's always nice when the OP returns to his/her thread to provide additional info or to follow-up with an update.

While I have to admit I'm rubbing my hands with glee, I don't have time to contribute at the moment (not until after we get back home from Sunday dinner later on). [:)]




samdarella -> RE: Public Submission (8/3/2014 11:22:35 PM)

People offend me in public all the day. Spouting their religion. Forcing me to listen to their screaming children. So fuck them if they don't like to hear me call Master Sir.




FieryOpal -> RE: Public Submission (8/3/2014 11:40:41 PM)

[Parsed for emphasis]
quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiresdommes

Yes this is my second 24/7 D/s relationship. We do live together.
We are in a TPE and at home it is a total dynamic. I would say we are a very high protocol privately and have been a low protocol publicly.
My current relationship is with someone more experienced although three years younger than me.
While my first relationship began vanilla and transitioned to D/s this relationship has been D/s from day one as I was seeking a dominant partner.

It isn't for me to judge how you and your Mistress have gone about formalizing your M/s, whether you entered into it prematurely or not, but I would like to assess your situation in all fairness, if it would be helpful to you.
You wanted to replicate your first vanilla-turned-D/s live-in relationship. You had time then to make the transition from vanilla-to-getting-kinkier, to bedroom D/s & BDSM Topping/bottoming activities, to your TPE dynamic.
It is not known how long you have been with your present Mistress, but it would appear you both have rushed into more of a Master/slave dynamic, without first easing into your interactive Domination & submission styles, and developing deeper levels of trust--which takes time to not skip over integrative steps.
Much like the ill-advised impulsiveness of going on a vanilla date that becomes a one-night stand, then turns into shacking up together when one of you moves in the very next day.
Against the odds, some accelerated relationships do pan out with mutual dedication and effort, whereas others unravel or degenerate into a semblance of something other than what was originally intended or envisioned as the relationship ideal.

quote:

When we first became involved I told her that I didn't know my limits with the exception that I am not into extreme pain or things like electric shock etc.
Her preferred methods of physical discipline are spankings and corner time but she also will do things like silent treatment, taking away prviledges (like golf or playing basketball) and she does enjoy some feminization but that can also be fun.
So to answer your question, I would say we have discussed punishment dynamics. I would say that most times correction comes first and if I repeat the offense then it might be followed with punishment for reinforcement.
We recently had an incident with the dishes and she told me she didn't want me to do something a certain way anymore. I will follow her instructions but I also know if I don't there will be consequences.

What I am sensing are mixed-signal messages here. What your Mistress considers discipline/correction or chastisement, you view as punishment.
Whatever she does with you as funishment (for enjoyment), is not for discipline (NOT for enjoyment), and yet you have not made the distinction between these variants.
It is possible she is confusing the implementation of the two or hasn't fully explained it to you, or else expects you to be old and/or experienced enough to know the difference already.
The reason why this matters is because one is for recreation and fosters positive reinforcement; in other words, it rewards desired behavior.
The other is for the purpose of correction and evokes negative reinforcement, and under no circumstances can this be fun or enjoyable to either one of you. Not amusing, not silly, not playful--none of that.
You are already pain-averse and will therefore gravitate toward more hedonistic pleasure-seeking as a result. Like an errant child, whatever you enjoy, secretly enjoy, or find fun, human nature will seek more of.

The pattern that I often see is when Dommes use humiliation as a tool to influence behavior. This can be a very effective tool.
It can also backfire, if the sub gets into humiliation--which will arouse the sub sexually when he gets conditioned to enjoy being humiliated.
Once these sexually humiliating practices excite him, he will passive-aggressively become bratty, unruly or otherwise disobedient in order to seek out what has now morphed into *funishment* for him.
For example, spankings & corner time as funishment would be an ineffective disciplinary measure if the two of you are getting off on this.
For other subs, a spanking would be a Soft Limit, or a last-resort measure of punishment to be taken seriously in order to (re)set things right in the D/s dynamic;
for some subs, spanking is a Hard Limit or a deal breaker and therefore not up for negotiation.

quote:

She does have a daughter who knows of the dynamics of our relationship and she has a group of friends who live the lifestyle to varying degrees. Although her daughter has been around us I was still mortified the first time she came over and I was in the corner. So, I would not say our relationship has been purely private but I am comfortable around others who accept the lifestyle or participate in it.
In my previous relationship I was put in some very embarrassing situations but alwaqys around people who were into D/s.
I have attended fetish parties and have been naked on a leash.

Not to be critical of your D/s-M/s, but are you both on the same page? Do you consider yourself a slave? Does she consider you her slave, whose consent was given once and for all?
One of the first things I learned about effective parenting is to never shame your child in public or in front of others. Discipline is to be done in private, whether it's a reprimand or a scolding.
(To tell you the truth, I have never laid a hand on either one of my sons, never more than a light swat on a padded diapered bottom that they laughed about after testing out my unheeded forewarning.)
If you are not okay with being humiliated in front of others, then you will end up acting out in other ways passive-aggressively, and your Mistress may feel she has no choice but to start micro-managing your life.
Is that what you want, to turn your Mistress into, a control freak? Because if it were me, I'd sooner dump your ass than make my life more complicated than it has to be.
Worst-case scenario, she tires of you, perhaps decides to teach you a lesson in cuckolding or "forced" bi, or beats your ass until it bleeds and tears are streaming down your face.
Wouldn't it be better to be honest up front and put some deep thought into what are your boundaries and limits, then have a heart-to-heart discussion with your Domme partner?

quote:

Your 3rd question you asked why I was punished. We were out with a group of friends who are not openly aware of our dynamic but likely have drawn some conclusions. We had dinner and went to a bar afterwards.
We sat at a table in one room and I went to the restroom. On my way back I ran into two of the guys we were with watching the baseball game at the bar.
Rather than go back to the table i started talking to them and ended up watching the game. I did not return to the table for over an hour and a half.
However, I could see the table and she could see me. Everyone seemed to be having a good time. When the game ended I walked back to the table. One of the guys said, "Do you want one more beer before we go?"
I could tell she was upset so I asked, "Do you mind if I have one more?" She looked at me and in front of her friend she said, "Is that how you ask?" I became a little uncomfortable and saaid, "May I please have another beer?"
She said, "No, you need a lesson in manners." I knew her friend overheard everything although she prentended not to. At that point we said goodbye and left.
After a long night of soul searching that is why I bagan this thread.

Having absolutely nothing to do with D/s-M/s or F/m, your conduct toward your Lady Love was inexcusable. A gentleman does not neglect his date, his steady partner, his SO while they are out as a couple or in a group, and whether you realize it or not, you subconsciously HUMILIATED your Mistress in front of others by showing what a low priority she was in public.
I'd have bitch-slapped you silly in the car, and then whipped your ass when we got home until my riding crop broke in half...and I'm not a sadistic Domme.
Under the circumstances, your Mistress gave you multiple opportunities to redeem yourself and act like the grown middle-aged man that you are and not an immature oaf. She has been more than tolerant and lenient with you.

quote:

I will whisper Mistress to her in public but only so the two of us can hear it. She likes to be called Ma'am and I have never questioned that.

I hope you're good at doing lots of ass-kissing, and brush up on your begging skills while you're at it (has to be convincing, not fakey), then approach her to negotiate the terms of your humility to both of your satisfaction, or to lay down new consensually agreed-upon ground rules.
Start by apologizing and admitting that you were in the wrong. Chances are she is waiting for you to stop acting SO FREAKING DENSE and FULL OF FALSELY SELF-JUSTIFIED HUBRIS. THIS is the REAL LESSON you were meant to learn, kiddo.




CreativeDominant -> RE: Public Submission (8/4/2014 10:50:45 AM)

I think this is my first time of disagreeing with you, F.O. but I think it is over something valid: in his very first post, the O.P. stated that he was uncomfortable with what he considers overt displays of submission in "vanilla" public. From the post, it seems that he has made his mistress aware of this and she disagrees...feeling he should be proud to show he is sub to her.

Despite all his other clarifications of their relationship, he does not contradict what he originally posted. IF that is still true...and he HAS made her aware of this, then her continuing to do things that points out in "vanilla" settings who "wears the pants" seems to be something done only in consideration of what she wants. While I agree...indeed believe...that it is the dominant who guides the relationship, that is once the relationship is laid out and agreed to by both parties. To me, the fact that his first post has not been clarified or disagreed with by the O. P. in further posts indicates that there is at least one big sticking area. Because of this, I'd have to say that he is not the only one being dense here, nor is he the only one at fault.

Perhaps, as noted, there needs to be clarification, through honest discussion, about all these areas mentioned by others and this area in particular.




Admiresdommes -> RE: Public Submission (8/4/2014 12:41:53 PM)

Thank you again for such a long thoughtful reply. I will try to respond as best I can since I am at my office and frequently interrupted.

I have been with my second Mistress for 13 months and she pretty much moved in 7 months ago. I think it is unfair to talk too much about her violating my limits. My first relationships transition from vanilla to D/s was led by my girlfriend. Unlike most relationships it was not my request. My experience prior to that was strictly in the bedroom and my role was always in the more dominant position. My experiences were strictly fun and romantic. When my first relationship transitioned I discovered my kink gene and found the training very exciting and fun.

In my second relationship I was seeking a dominant partner. We were initially set up by a Domm woman I met on the internet from another state who introduced us since we lived in the same town. Our initial dates were very vanilla getting to know each other and to see if we were a match. I slowly tried to do little things such as picking up dishes etc to move thigs along. We actually moved fairly slowly going through a "feeling out process." Unlike my first Mistress, she was very experienced and her x husband was submissive to her. In our get to know each other discussions I stated that I did not really know my limits. I knew I was not a masochist and did not crave pain. I also knew that I have a very successful career and would not want to jeopardize that with public submission. However, I really did not have experience with humiliation so I don't know that at the time we discussed it. I don't think it is faie to say that this was an "accelerated relationship."

I do think I understand the difference between correction and punishment. I consider correction verbal instruction on how to do something correctly. One day we were arguing and she told me to go sit on the top of the stairs. She told me it was going to get ugly so she was just removing me from the situation for both of us. I consider that a form of correction.

Punishment to me in our relationship is spankings, corner time, taking away priveleges like going to watch a game with my friends or not allowing me to golf, limiting computer time, and I would now include humiliating me in that category. I do not consider spankings, corner time or any of those as "funishment." Personally I find her spankings very painful and she has finally given in to me that "maintenance spankings" are not fair. I also despise corner time. Funishments for me would be kneeling and kissing her feet or playing the feminized maid. Feminization has been used as punishment but we have both had fun with it so I would put that in the funishment category. In short I would say spankings, corner time and humiliation have been very affective tools for modifying my behavior and she would agree.

I'm not certain I understand the difference between a slave and a submissive but I would say I am a submissive. I have a very good career as a VP of Sales for a large company. I have many outside interests. I play golf, basketball. softball, workout everyday, ride my bike, ski. Some of those things we do together but not most of them. I do however give her full control. If I am going to golf I ask permission. I am responsible for the majority of the housework but she does help out. I may ask to play golf and she may reply with a list of jobs I need to complete. If theyt are done to her satisfaction I can then go golfing. It is understood that we will have an open discussion on any decision but at the end she has final say and I am not allowed to question her once the decision is made. We have practiced certain commands that might be my cue to be quiet or kneel at her feet. To me that is the behavior of a sub not a slave but I could be wrong.

As far as my behavior that night goes I did learn my lesson. I was with two of the other men in our group at the bar and we were in full view of the table, There were only 4 couples and the person who did not watch the game is not interested in sports. When we got into the car that night the first thing she said was, "You are not to talk all the way home but you had better listen good." She told me how disappointed she was in me and how I embarrassed her. When we got home she put down her purse and ordered me straight to the couch. She then told me to pull down my shorts and panties and put me over her knee. She spanks very hard even with her bare hand. Then she told me to stand in the corner while she got ready for bed. However, in the meantime she returned a call from her daughter and I ended up in the corner for 40 minutes. I don't need to be reminded of my behavior. Trust me I have learned a painful lesson.







FieryOpal -> RE: Public Submission (8/4/2014 1:39:16 PM)

[Brackets & extra punctuation mine]
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

I think this is my first time of disagreeing with you, F.O. but I think it is over something valid: in his very first post, the O.P. stated that he was uncomfortable with what he considers overt displays of submission in "vanilla" public. From the post, it seems that he has made his mistress aware of this and she disagrees...feeling he should be proud to show he is sub to her.

Despite all his other clarifications of their relationship, he does not contradict what he originally posted. IF that is still true...and he HAS made her aware of this, then her continuing to do things that points out in "vanilla" settings who "wears the pants" seems to be something done only in consideration of what she wants. While I agree...indeed believe...that it is the dominant who guides the relationship, that is once the relationship is laid out and agreed to by both parties. To me, the fact that his first post has not been clarified or disagreed with by the O. P. in further posts indicates that there is at least one big sticking area. Because of this, I'd have to say that he is not the only one being dense here, nor is he the only one at fault.

Perhaps, as noted, there needs to be clarification, through honest discussion, about all these areas mentioned by others and this area in particular.

I believe we started out with convergent thoughts about this particular D/s relationship dynamic, which has been characterized as 24/7 or full-time Power Exchange, where this couple has undefined limits and boundary issues. That much was relatively clear. What wasn't clear at the onset was the extent to which their Power Exchange had been delineated between the two of them.
The s-type OP was not comfortable with the specification that his Mistress would require him to publicly defer to her as her submissive.
I will touch upon a few key points here in an effort to keep on track.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiresdommes [OpeningPost#1]

I was punished and told I needed to understand that ours is a lifestyle and not something limited to the sanctity of our house. As part of the new discipline I was told I should address her as Ma'am in public....
I will admit that I don't like to advertise that I am sub to her. She feels I should be proud to have people know I am her sub.

-- He does not seem to take exception to his Dominant's authority to "punish" him.
-- There was a rule change or the introduction of "new discipline," which his Mistress explained in general terms, which he doesn't appear to fully understand in order to consent to.
-- He states his Domme instructed ("told") him to address her publicly as "Ma'am." He is "curious how others handle this," i.e., the use of an honorific when spoken in public by a sub with his/her Dominant.

Then he goes on to say:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiresdommes [Post#10]

I may have misrepresented my post when I stated that she wants me to call her Ma'am in public. I was really using that as an example.

This is a moot point at the present time, but one which the OP was apparently anticipating.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiresdommes [OPost#1]

I have always tried to be overly polite and a gentelman when we are out but I will admit that I don't like to advertise that I am sub to her. She feels I should be proud to have people know I am her sub.

Taken at face value initially, however, when describing this couple's interactions in public among mixed group(s) of others:
-- He did not act like a gentleman. Gentlemen do not leave their ladies to fend for themselves, acting inattentive for admittedly a lengthy period ("I did not return to the table for over an hour and a half." [per OP's Post#22]) while they shoot the breeze and drink rounds of beers with their buddies at a separate table.
-- Manspeak for: My SO feels I shouldn't act as if I am ashamed to be seen out in public with her, be insecure and afraid of appearing pussy-whipped, or act like a punkass m.f.
(Not to mention he probably embarrassed her further by wanting to imbibe another drink for the road. He doesn't say who was driving them home, whether either of them were sober enough to be the designated driver behind the wheel.)

Vanilla or not vanilla, OP's behavior toward his Domme was unacceptable. The main difference, which is still up in the air, is how consequences are dealt with.
In a vanilla LTR/live-in situation, the offending party may get the silent treatment for an indeterminate period of time (the "Mexican Stand-Off"), the couple may get into an argument, the offending party may get cut off from affection and/or any further sexual contact until he apologizes and promises not to behave like this again.
In a D/s relationship dynamic, matters between the Dominant and submissive are handled differently within the parameters and according to their mutually-agreed upon protocols (usually in advance, presumably, but that isn't always the case when encountering new or unexpected situations/snafus).

Whereas vanilla & D/s dynamics may differ in terms of the handling of consequences, the same basic or fundamental interpersonal tenets for treating the other half of the (committed) couple respectfully do not, regardless of who is perceived to be at fault, which is why it is imperative that there be open lines of communication at all times.
Both parties are mature individuals spanning their late 40's (with a grown adult child) to the half-century mark, and both need to take responsibility for their acts of commission AND of omission.

ETA: I was composing before I saw you had posted, Ad/OP, and haven't read yours yet.




CreativeDominant -> RE: Public Submission (8/4/2014 3:55:01 PM)

You make some valid points. And not being fromm the s-type side of the kneel, I freely admit there are some things that I don't always understand about the submissive mindset...especially the male submissive mindset.

I also agree that he did not act like a gentleman by hanging out at the bar with "the guys". They may be doing so because it is something they've always done and their ladies are used to it. However, he is in a fairly new relationship and submissive or not, vanilla or not, he should not have acted this way unless he was prepared to being called on it. My perception is that, while he was prepared to be called on it, he thought that would happen at home and not in public. This...even with the moot point you pointed out above...seems to be a sticking point for him: the overt expression of who runs the relationship and the demeaning expression of that control. This is where I believe a session...or sessions...of further communication needs to take place.

Setting that all aside, I know that for me...even when I was vanilla...I did not care for correction by my partner in public. Nor did I do so with her. Even now, in D/s situations, I choose not to display that in public. Part of that is because of my horrific experience with being outed and part of that is a feeling of not caring to show disruption in my relationship in public. That is MY way, however and others mileage MAY very well vary.




FieryOpal -> RE: Public Submission (8/4/2014 5:44:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

You make some valid points. And not being fromm the s-type side of the kneel, I freely admit there are some things that I don't always understand about the submissive mindset...especially the male submissive mindset.

I also agree that he did not act like a gentleman by hanging out at the bar with "the guys". They may be doing so because it is something they've always done and their ladies are used to it. However, he is in a fairly new relationship and submissive or not, vanilla or not, he should not have acted this way unless he was prepared to being called on it. My perception is that, while he was prepared to be called on it, he thought that would happen at home and not in public. This...even with the moot point you pointed out above...seems to be a sticking point for him: the overt expression of who runs the relationship and the demeaning expression of that control. This is where I believe a session...or sessions...of further communication needs to take place.

Setting that all aside, I know that for me...even when I was vanilla...I did not care for correction by my partner in public. Nor did I do so with her. Even now, in D/s situations, I choose not to display that in public. Part of that is because of my horrific experience with being outed and part of that is a feeling of not caring to show disruption in my relationship in public. That is MY way, however and others mileage MAY very well vary.

Can the D-types ever fully understand about the s-types, or they about us? I find it easier to relate to male subs than femsubs, which seems strange (since I should have more of an affinity for my own gender, you would think). [sm=confused.gif]

Any type of correction mono a mono should be done in private, I agree. Pull your partner off to the side, if "the Look" doesn't work as it should. Actually, suddenly becoming (super) sugary sweet is a good way to cover your tracks--it really isn't anybody else's business what goes on between you and your intimate partner.

(Btw, in making a point, I was not advocating face-slapping. In fact, there are safety concerns to be conscientious about. There are, however, male subs who are very amenable to a prompt correction in this manner.)

But really, after a certain age, experience level in committed relationships, a failed marriage or two, wouldn't you have learned by now what irks the female or the male of the species?
So, in my mind, there is no reasonable excuse. I wouldn't treat a friend like this. In fact, in 1-1/2 hours' time, I'd have shown more affection and attention to my cat. [sm=hippie.gif]

[ETA emoti]




Domnotlooking -> RE: Public Submission (8/4/2014 6:05:39 PM)

Doing the math:

Public submission has very little upside. The odd boner before it gets old hat and then…..sharply diminishing returns.

But there is a pile of downside, as others have very patiently pointed out to you.

So:

Low/no upside versus considerable downside.

It don't take no rocket scientist to do this math.




Maybeher -> RE: Public Submission (8/4/2014 6:27:24 PM)

What pleases her should be your focus, and if someone knows you're sub just from you saying ma'am to someone they don't know they're probably already in the lifestyle lol. I always called my former Sir in public and no one freaked... We didn't push our kink on others but we had our bond wherever we were. There's a line between saying ma'am and her flogging you for the world to see. Do what pleases her, if you focus on others you'll always be on guard




Admiresdommes -> RE: Public Submission (8/5/2014 7:30:17 AM)

Thank you all for your thoughts. I feel like I am being characterized as this evil person for watching the game with the other guys. This group of people were her friends and I had never even met one of the couples before that evening. I realize that I tried too hard to fit in with them and in the process lost track of my priorities. However, I was only a short distance from the table and I coul see her laughing and having a good time. In addition, we had talked that this might be a fun group of people to go on vacation with so she hoped I would make an effort to get along well with the other guys. I was trying to fit in, not challenge her in any way.

The punishment, both physical and mental, has been brutal. However, if there is an example of effective punishment modifying behavior, this would be it. I have certainlt learned a lesson and will not be a repeat offender. I have felt that since this happened, every little infraction that I have is being called out. Last night I did sit down and ask what it would take to move on and we had a nice discussion. While incidents like this can be frustrating, they also seem to reinforce my submission and why I am right where I belong. For some strange reason it also makes me feel more connected.

I am very happy that I joined this blog. It seems to be a great outlet for open and fair discussion. Thank you all for your comments.




CloakedProtector -> RE: Public Submission (8/5/2014 2:53:33 PM)

OP, the lifestyle may extend outside the House.

In public you are either in a lifestyle environment (eg: a BDSM club) and then I think that if you accepted to be there you call your Mistress Ma'am or you are in a public non-lifestyle environment (eg: the dinner after a boards of directors meting where you may bring in your partner) and then I don't think it is a good idea to call her ma'm, even if she wants it, unless your are prepared to take the consequences.

It will of course all boil down again to what limits things have been negotiated up-front or not.

As a general rule I believe in NOT pushing our lifestyle in the faces of those that are not involved. There is already sufficient controversy and in some Hollywoodian fashion whatever BDSM disciplines one is into the public seems to easily label it Sado-Machosism without knowing the large scope and many variation in BDSM that have nothing to do with that. Calling your Mistress Ma'am in a non-BDSM non-Lifestyle public environment will certainly contribute to that controversy in a number of cases. Your Mistress should take that in account too.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Public Submission (8/5/2014 3:21:11 PM)


The foundation for this thread has, obviously, changed somewhat ...

While I really still don't see an issue with "Ma'am", in public, some have taken it to a level of "shoving our kink into unwilling faces".

On the surface, I call "Bullshit Bob" on that. First off, what you call someone is not a kink it's a term of endearment.

Scratching a little deeper, I'm consistently treated to people calling each other "bitch" (or worse) in public. So, on what I have come to call the Stephen Fry Scale, I think "Ma'am" is pretty close to the bottom.

Now, however, we have the issue of you being punished/embarrassed in public.

Quite honestly, I leaned an important mantra, many years ago: "Praise in public. Punish in private".

By mixing the two, your mistress embarrassed you (that's what it sounded like, from your post) and she may have lowered your friends' impression of you. That's a huge no-no for me.

I'm not necessarily talking about from a lifestyle standpoint and I don't think that your mistress was "shoving her kink" in anyone's face but she was diminishing your standing amongst your peers and that, to me, is reason enough to cause some major issues in a relationship.







Screen captures still RULE! Ya feel me?




CreativeDominant -> RE: Public Submission (8/5/2014 5:44:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fiery Opal

But really, after a certain age, experience level in committed relationships, a failed marriage or two, wouldn't you have learned by now what irks the female or the male of the species?
So, in my mind, there is no reasonable excuse. I wouldn't treat a friend like this. In fact, in 1-1/2 hours' time, I'd have shown more affection and attention to my cat. [sm=hippie.gif]

[ETA emoti]
I can't tell you how hard it was not to answer this in a funny (ha ha)manner. But I'm taking the good path...[:D]

I've learned a lot about women through the years and a lot about my own gender. While there are generalities, the one thing I have found to be true is this: JUST about the time you think you know how a woman or man will react, based on previous observations of the gender, THAT'S when you get the curve ball...this is the one, who in this situation, acts COMPLETELY different than any other man or woman of your acquaintance.

Again, a good reminder of the need to spend time listening to the words and observing the actions of someone you're in a new relationship with...especially someone you are thinking of entering into, or have already entered into, a more serious relationship with. Especially a D/s relationship where wants, needs, desires are laid out but also where expectations should be laid out...from BOTH sides.






FieryOpal -> RE: Public Submission (8/5/2014 6:48:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiresdommes

I feel like I am being characterized as this evil person for watching the game with the other guys. This group of people were her friends and I had never even met one of the couples before that evening. I realize that I tried too hard to fit in with them and in the process lost track of my priorities. However, I was only a short distance from the table and I coul see her laughing and having a good time. In addition, we had talked that this might be a fun group of people to go on vacation with so she hoped I would make an effort to get along well with the other guys. I was trying to fit in, not challenge her in any way.

....I have certainlt learned a lesson and will not be a repeat offender. I have felt that since this happened, every little infraction that I have is being called out. Last night I did sit down and ask what it would take to move on and we had a nice discussion.
<snip>

Overall, you have shown that you have a good attitude toward constructive criticism and that says a great deal positively about your character.

I realize I can be blunt at times when I detect any hints of slight cluelessness or defensiveness, but your integrity is not in question.
Hopefully, you haven't felt [my] responses were symptomatic of a "Mene mene tekel upharsin" warning message (i.e., translated literally, "It has been counted and counted, weighed and divided"[...and you have been found lacking on the scales or in the balance]).

For whatever it's worth, my generic advice to submissive males is this:

1. Be attentive, attentive, attentive.
2. Refer to Rule No. 1 above.
3. Be attentive and compliant (within limits).

And for all males in general, with the possible exception of being called upon to perform a heroic act:

1. Never be inattentive to your date in public.

As well as this: (Appreciate your niceness, CD. [;)] )

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

I can't tell you how hard it was not to answer this in a funny (ha ha)manner. But I'm taking the good path...[:D]

I've learned a lot about women through the years and a lot about my own gender. While there are generalities, the one thing I have found to be true is this: JUST about the time you think you know how a woman or man will react, based on previous observations of the gender, THAT'S when you get the curve ball...this is the one, who in this situation, acts COMPLETELY different than any other man or woman of your acquaintance.

Again, a good reminder of the need to spend time listening to the words and observing the actions of someone you're in a new relationship with...especially someone you are thinking of entering into, or have already entered into, a more serious relationship with. Especially a D/s relationship where wants, needs, desires are laid out but also where expectations should be laid out...from BOTH sides.




thompsonx -> RE: Public Submission (8/6/2014 6:18:57 PM)


ORIGINAL: FieryOpal


Taken at face value initially, however, when describing this couple's interactions in public among mixed group(s) of others:
-- He did not act like a gentleman. Gentlemen do not leave their ladies to fend for themselves, acting inattentive for admittedly a lengthy period ("I did not return to the table for over an hour and a half." [per OP's Post#22]) while they shoot the breeze and drink rounds of beers with their buddies at a separate table.


According to the op these "buddies" were the people he and his mistress were out with. They were not at a seperate table but at the bar. These people have been seeing each other for more than a year. It would make sense that if he knew that this would offend her he would not do it. She did not indicate her disfavor until they were leaving. It would appear that he was punished for not being able to read her mind.
These are not teenagers, wouldn't common courtesy demand she at least apprise him he was pissing her off?



Vanilla or not vanilla, OP's behavior toward his Domme was unacceptable.

Vanilla or not vanilla, the op's domme needs to grow up and learn a little civility. According to the op they had been going together for 13 months and living together for 7 months. The op states that the purpose of the date was to see if they were compatable with the couples with an eye to extended outings. Would not the venue of a that shared experience help him to determine if these two of the three were? Would the continuity of this effort have been enhanced by his getting up occasionallly and going over to reassure her of his undying affection?



The main difference, which is still up in the air, is how consequences are dealt with.
In a vanilla LTR/live-in situation, the offending party may get the silent treatment for an indeterminate period of time (the "Mexican Stand-Off"),


If I had a wife I would never be so rude as to cease speaking to her. I would tell her immediately on reaching the car of how I saw the issue and would invite her comments. To ignore someone I claim to love is not on the table.


the couple may get into an argument, the offending party may get cut off from affection and/or any further sexual contact until he apologizes and promises not to behave like this again.


She would not have to appologize. She would have to recognize that I cannot read her mind. If she has an issue she should tell me and not wait for me to read her mind. To cut her off from my affections and kinkey fuckery would be stingy,mean and childish.

In a D/s relationship dynamic, matters between the Dominant and submissive are handled differently within the parameters and according to their mutually-agreed upon protocols (usually in advance, presumably, but that isn't always the case when encountering new or unexpected situations/snafus).


Which is exactly my point. This was obviously an unexpecdted situation handled poorly.

Whereas vanilla & D/s dynamics may differ in terms of the handling of consequences, the same basic or fundamental interpersonal tenets for treating the other half of the (committed) couple respectfully do not, regardless of who is perceived to be at fault,


You have left no doubt in our minds as to whom you feel was at fault.



which is why it is imperative that there be open lines of communication at all times.

Which his domme does not seem to care about.





Both parties are mature individuals spanning their late 40's (with a grown adult child) to the half-century mark, and both need to take responsibility for their acts of commission AND of omission.


I could not agree more.






FieryOpal -> RE: Public Submission (8/6/2014 9:14:34 PM)

[Brackets mine]
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

According to the op these "buddies" were the people he and his mistress were out with. They were not at a seperate table but at the bar. These people have been seeing each other for more than a year. It would make sense that if he knew that this would offend her he would not do it. She did not indicate her disfavor until they were leaving. It would appear that he was punished for not being able to read her mind.
These are not teenagers, wouldn't common courtesy demand she at least apprise him he was pissing her off?


She was courteous and considerate in patiently awaiting her half of their couple to return from the restroom for over 1-1/2 hours while he went semi-AWOL bromancing the other guys.
It does not take a mind-reader to show common courtesy, unless it is perfectly acceptable to you for your date to excuse herself to powder her nose and then not return to the table to rejoin you while she drinks rounds of beer at the bar with a couple of the ladies who have separated themselves from the group.
Do you always wait until your lady calls you out in front of others to indicate that your rudeness and/or inconsideration has gotten to where you have pissed her off? Do you not have more class and better aplomb that that?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiresdommes [OPost#22]

We had dinner and went to a bar afterwards.
We sat at a table in one room and I went to the restroom.
On my way back I ran into two of the guys we were with watching the baseball game at the bar.
Rather than go back to the table i started talking to them and ended up watching the game.

I did not return to the table for over an hour and a half.

However, I could see the table and she could see me.
Everyone seemed to be having a good time.

[My NOTE: At the bar while drinking rounds of beer, the guys were having a "good time" bromancing, and OP's SO did not look or act VISIBLY upset. What is unknown is whether he picked up on any subtle clues while making furtive glances, waved to her at any point in acknowledgment, or whether he continued to tune her out as if he were a stag bachelor without getting up to check on her to see how she and the other ladies were doing, or if he could bring her over a drink like a considerate date/partner would do.]

When the game ended I walked back to the table.
One of the guys said, "Do you want one more beer before we go?"

I could tell she was upset so I asked, "Do you mind if I have one more?" [My NOTE: He was the driver.]

Here, fixed it for ya:

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Vanilla or not vanilla, the [OP] needs to grow up and learn a little civility. According to the op they had been going together for 13 months and living together for 7 months.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiresdommes [OPost#33]

I realize that I tried too hard to fit in with them and in the process lost track of my priorities.
In addition, we had talked that this might be a fun group of people to go on vacation with so she hoped I would make an effort to get along well with the other guys.

The op states that the purpose of the date was to see if they were compatable with the couples with an eye to extended outings. Would not the venue of a that shared experience help him to determine if these two of the three were?
Would the continuity of this effort have been enhanced by his getting up occasionallly and going over to reassure her of his undying affection?


The primary purpose of the group date was for these pairs of couples to have a good time, with the ancillary purpose of collectively bonding.
He realizes he went too far and was out of hand. Why is it so difficult for you to see that? Are you the Bromance Fairy? [8D]
Are you in the habit of withholding your "undying affection" from your loved one, or else refusing to showing any PDAs to your loved one?

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

In a vanilla LTR/live-in situation, the offending party may get the silent treatment for an indeterminate period of time (the "Mexican Stand-Off"),

If I had a wife I would never be so rude as to cease speaking to her. I would tell her immediately on reaching the car of how I saw the issue and would invite her comments.
To ignore someone I claim to love is not on the table.


If you had a wife, she would possibly only count her blessings that you would cease speaking to her rather than be your (conceivably typical) argumentative self. [:D]
As for your last sentence, I couldn't agree with you more...to which I shall add, "to not return to my loved one's table in a public venue for close to 2 hours until I'd had a few beers with the guys."

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

the couple may get into an argument, the offending party may get cut off from affection and/or any further sexual contact until he apologizes and promises not to behave like this again.

To cut her off from my affections and kinkey fuckery would be stingy,mean and childish.

Earth to Dude, YOU would be the one getting cut off, not the other way around. [8|] Unlike men, women cannot ordinarily flick on a switch to feel sexual desire for a partner they are no longer feeling an intimate connection with. Gender Differences 101. (You might want to take a refresher course in this. [;)] )

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

Whereas vanilla & D/s dynamics may differ in terms of the handling of consequences, the same basic or fundamental interpersonal tenets for treating the other half of the (committed) couple respectfully do not, regardless of who is perceived to be at fault,

You have left no doubt in our minds as to whom you feel was at fault.

Thank you, you are astute on this singular point to wit. You leave no doubt that you are siding with your gender regardless of the circumstances, whereas I would find any such conduct remotely resembling the aforesaid unacceptable whether it had been the female half of the couple neglecting her male counterpart in public.

(I would fix your statement [below] again, but I don't want the OP to start feeling badly about himself by taking our comments to one another personally.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

which is why it is imperative that there be open lines of communication at all times.

Which his domme does not seem to care about.

A non sequitur which is as baseless as it is pulled out of thin air.




thompsonx -> RE: Public Submission (8/7/2014 4:31:20 AM)


ORIGINAL: FieryOpal


ORIGINAL: thompsonx

According to the op these "buddies" were the people he and his mistress were out with. They were not at a seperate table but at the bar. These people have been seeing each other for more than a year. It would make sense that if he knew that this would offend her he would not do it. She did not indicate her disfavor until they were leaving. It would appear that he was punished for not being able to read her mind.
These are not teenagers, wouldn't common courtesy demand she at least apprise him he was pissing her off?


She was courteous and considerate in patiently awaiting her half of their couple to return from the restroom for over 1-1/2 hours while he went semi-AWOL bromancing the other guys.
It does not take a mind-reader to show common courtesy, unless it is perfectly acceptable to you for your date to excuse herself to powder her nose and then not return to the table to rejoin you while she drinks rounds of beer at the bar with a couple of the ladies who have separated themselves from the group.



Perhaps it would have been wiser of him to anticipate his dommes insecurities and returned to their table after going to the rest room and checked in and reassured her of his undying affction and asked her renewed permission to complete his assigned mission of "bromancing" her potential new friends husbands.




Do you always wait until your lady calls you out in front of others to indicate that your rudeness and/or inconsideration has gotten to where you have pissed her off? Do you not have more class and better aplomb that that?


I am not a mind reader.



Vanilla or not vanilla, the [OP] needs to grow up and learn a little civility. According to the op they had been going together for 13 months and living together for 7 months.

The op states that the purpose of the date was to see if they were compatable with the couples with an eye to extended outings. Would not the venue of a that shared experience help him to determine if these two of the three were?
Would the continuity of this effort have been enhanced by his getting up occasionallly and going over to reassure her of his undying affection?





In a vanilla LTR/live-in situation, the offending party may get the silent treatment for an indeterminate period of time (the "Mexican Stand-Off"),

If I had a wife I would never be so rude as to cease speaking to her. I would tell her immediately on reaching the car of how I saw the issue and would invite her comments.



the couple may get into an argument, the offending party may get cut off from affection and/or any further sexual contact until he apologizes and promises not to behave like this again.

To cut her off from my affections and kinkey fuckery would be stingy,mean and childish.

Earth to Dude, YOU would be the one getting cut off, not the other way around. [8|]


That presupposes the fallacy that the sexual affections of one of us is somehow more heavily weighted than the other.




Unlike men, women cannot ordinarily flick on a switch to feel sexual desire for a partner they are no longer feeling an intimate connection with. Gender Differences 101. (You might want to take a refresher course in this. [;)] )


You are mistaken. Men cannot ordinarily flick on a switch and feel sexual desire for a partner they no longer feel an intimate connection with.



You leave no doubt that you are siding with your gender regardless of the circumstances,


I am siding with the facts as presented.


whereas I would find any such conduct remotely resembling the aforesaid unacceptable whether it had been the female half of the couple neglecting her male counterpart in public.

I missed the part where you said she was a jerk for ignoring him while he was doing what she told him to do.



which is why it is imperative that there be open lines of communication at all times.

Which his domme does not seem to care about.

A non sequitur which is as baseless as it is pulled out of thin air.


He mentioned that his domme told him not to speak. That sorta puts an end to two way communication.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0630188