subrosaDom
Posts: 724
Joined: 2/16/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: subrosaDom quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic get rid of the EPA!!!!!!! Empower the states to handle their problems, where the leadership knows the people and the problems and is best suited to offer up and enforce practical solutions While Adolf Hitler enjoyed total centralized federal control, we are not yet the Third Reich. 4 states and a foreign nation border Lake Erie. Which one do you suggest be the one to be empowered? If you consider the entire Great Lakes basin it is a much larger number of states and even more of Canada. Every state cannot institute its own solution over its own small segment of each lake that clearly won't work. Actual property rights solve the problem. Not that we're anywhere close to that. Agri runoff is actionable if you are harming my property. When you have a mix of private and government property as well as regulations vs. a more straightforward tort system, you get Rube Goldberg. No way in hell. Who do you sue? How many farmers allow runoff to feed into the Great Lakes basin? how would you ever get our legal system to attribute cost to each one? Then once they all appeal and fight the judgments it would be decades before action is taken when action needs to be taken now. Our legal system is FUBARed. It would be very difficult today, but it is the ideal solution to the problem. You'd have to get there through a series of transitional stages. .I own it, and I am responsible for what I put on any else's. You can certainly sue anyone and everyone responsible for runoff and it's up to the court to allocate liability. But with our current legal system, yes, it's a problem. You'd need legal reform in order to reflect real property rights, too.
_____________________________
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently. - Nietzsche
|