Sanity
Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006 From: Nampa, Idaho USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri The only "fundamental" change to the way DC runs was to change which party was running the dog and pony show. The D's oppose Bush to get their person in. The R's will oppose the D President to get their own person in. All that "hope and change" shit was nothing more than rhetoric meant to increase emotional support. When Obama campaigned on "hope and change," "yes, we can," and "fundamentally transform Washington," people like me noted he wasn't actually saying anything specific. He was never pressed for anything beyond those catch phrases. It was a brilliant strategy, really. Eight years of "Bush BAD," and all you had to do was run on "hope and change" and the other guy was nothing more than Bush III. In 2012, the media (and people here) didn't let Romney get away with catch phrases and lip service. They pressed him for specifics, completely unlike how they treated Obama in 2008. Anyone who thinks that we left Iraq because Obama was in office is touched in the head. No matter who we elected, we'd have gotten out of Iraq. We'd have gotten bin Laden. We'd have gotten out of Afghanistan. You are really denying that there are differences between the left and the right? Amazing. And for the most part, "the media" is just an arm of the DNC. Of course they gave the empty suit a pass after skewering W Dared to land on an aircraft carrier, my god... And then grilled the Mormon (who once was forced top put a diuretic dog on top of his car during a family trip) Any mention or criticism of Obamas past was racism though Brilliant strategy my ass. Its a series of propaganda campaigns, and its older than you and I put together
_____________________________
Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out
|