RE: Do you agree?

RE: Do you agree? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

Do you agree?

Yes

53% (7)

46% (6)

Total Votes : 13

(last vote on : 9/1/2014 9:20:23 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

thishereboi -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 3:50:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM In my experience women are monsters with the exception of my mom, the Virgin Mary, the Wiccan Goddesses including those dark Goddesses I have encountered, the Daughter of Diana, and my beloved. The sort of love I felt for my beloved was the sort that is its own reward. Whether or not the love of the Wiccan Goddesses and the Daughter of Diana could be thought of as indirectly the love of Lucifier is immaterial in that I am well thought of. They have done me no wrong. Hence, I have no reason to be unkind in return. Just one of those things. They were very sweet to me. My encounters with them never became dark for whatever reason. Christ does not seem to be their cup of tea, however, in that I have not observed these spiritual worlds intermingling. It does help to know that I have been loved. I always wondered why a grown man would spend so much time talking to himself on the internet. This attitude could explain a lot. Thanks for clearing that up.

FieryOpal -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 5:10:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM I take this as an admission that you have sex on the brain. [8\|] Was I the one who brought up the subject of prostitution? And FYI, if I had sex on my mind, it wouldn't be about paid sex because I am neither a provider nor a client. You obviously have me confused with someone else, as well as confusing gender tendencies, the predominant one being male seeking female sex worker or a male hustler. Please do get your head out of where the sun doesn't shine for the sake of being the OP of this thread instead of spouting (more) moronic dribble.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 5:26:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM In my experience women are monsters with the exception of my mom, the Virgin Mary, the Wiccan Goddesses including those dark Goddesses I have encountered, the Daughter of Diana, and my beloved. The sort of love I felt for my beloved was the sort that is its own reward. Whether or not the love of the Wiccan Goddesses and the Daughter of Diana could be thought of as indirectly the love of Lucifier is immaterial in that I am well thought of. They have done me no wrong. Hence, I have no reason to be unkind in return. Just one of those things. They were very sweet to me. My encounters with them never became dark for whatever reason. Christ does not seem to be their cup of tea, however, in that I have not observed these spiritual worlds intermingling. It does help to know that I have been loved. Ah!! Only 77 posts before he got to religion this time. [8\|]

FieryOpal -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 5:29:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Ah!! Only 77 posts before he got to religion this time. [8\|] Not to mention his own bastardized version of whatever-the-eff it is. It certainly isn't any form of Christianity I've ever encountered.

BenevolentM -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 5:35:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM In my experience women are monsters with the exception of my mom, the Virgin Mary, the Wiccan Goddesses including those dark Goddesses I have encountered, the Daughter of Diana, and my beloved. The sort of love I felt for my beloved was the sort that is its own reward. Whether or not the love of the Wiccan Goddesses and the Daughter of Diana could be thought of as indirectly the love of Lucifier is immaterial in that I am well thought of. They have done me no wrong. Hence, I have no reason to be unkind in return. Just one of those things. They were very sweet to me. My encounters with them never became dark for whatever reason. Christ does not seem to be their cup of tea, however, in that I have not observed these spiritual worlds intermingling. It does help to know that I have been loved. Ah!! Only 77 posts before he got to religion this time. [8\|] Wow, you are right. It was post 77. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 5:42:53 AM)
When are you going to stop writing this sort of drivel???

HeartAndSoul31 -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 6:14:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM The Trifecta of Womanhood When you have a lot of money you don't need a woman to do the dishes for you. You don't need her to do the laundry. Furthermore, you won't even need her to look after the children. That is what a governess is for. Wealth simplifies things. Companion? People of the same sex often make better companions, but there is some merit in thinking of a female as a companion if you have similar backgrounds if she too has a wealthy background, for example. Then there is her role as breeding stock. What else is there? Perhaps she is someone you could trust in a way you can't trust a professional? because she has a vested interest in being yours in a way that a stranger won't be. Companion Breeding Stock Confidant Maybe first mate where the man is the Captain Swab the deck, aye aye Captain! I suspect the idea of a woman being capable of fulfilling the role of first mate is an impractical romantic notion I possess. I have never encountered a woman capable of fulfilling such a role. Only men seem to be able to fulfill such roles. I suspect women are useless. Modern women are not good companions, terrible breeding stock, and cannot fulfill the role of a confidant. Excuse me, but what a horrible attitude toward women. I will have to agree women can turn to monsters when they are told they are useless. Whatever is wrong with you? Wealth simplifies things? I would have to disagree with that. It doesn't, it just brings up a different set of challenges, such as to much time living in your own head, becoming bitter, and having a holier then thou attitude for some. Very unbecoming btw. Everyone dreams of wealth, thinking life will be a funhouse, less worries. It some ways that would be true, but an over abundance sounds like a curse. Where life becomes so managed one can not enjoy or see the very simplest thing that makes one happy. What a pity.

BenevolentM -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 1:53:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HeartAndSoul31 Excuse me, but what a horrible attitude toward women. Good women like me, bad women don't. quote: ORIGINAL: HeartAndSoul31 ... (Wealth) just brings up a different set of challenges, ... This is true. quote: ORIGINAL: HeartAndSoul31 ... having a holier then thou attitude for some. That's an interesting correlation. Is there a correlation between religion and wealth? If religion makes you wealthy, perhaps one has to contend with the sorts of rigors wealth imposes when you discover religion. Why is it only poor people are atheists? Think peasant uprisings.

Aylee -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 2:22:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM Industry is beneficial to society and as such this matter cannot be ignored. I also recall a study that showed that people in societies where marriages are arranged are not unhappy for it. Arranged marriages are if I am not mistaken are often decided on economic grounds. If you marry the butcher, you will never go hungry. The need for industry is less clear today than it was in previous times long past. It has muddied the water. With the advent of washing machines the services that women provide men are not as important as they once were. The need/demand for sex has remained the same or increased. It certainly hasn't decreased. Women now have a greater value to society offering their submission to a boss than to a husband. Likewise, their is a greater emphasis on their capacity to put out sexually. Ironic isn't it? When it was thought impossible for a husband to rape his wife, the pressure to put out sexually was minimal. Even a retarded male can operate a washing machine and unless the man is a homosexual or just not interested in sex women have a monopoly. We are measuring marriages now on who does the washing? And "putting out"? Please do not ever refer to my own or anyone else sexual intimacies as "putting out." Talk about hating women.

Aylee -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 2:23:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM Women interfere with the sexual independence of straight men every day of the week. I do? Please tell me when that happened in the last week?

Aylee -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 2:28:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Zonie63 Has marriage become less important or obsolete in today's modern society, as BenevolentM suggests? For some people, that might be true. A lot of people stay single all their lives, and I know many people who were married in the past but don't ever want to get remarried. I don't think it has much to do with washing machines, though. From my point of view, the washing machine has NOTHING to do with wanting to re-marry or not. Married, now widowed, do not want to re-marry. This mostly has to do with not ever wanting to make end-of-life decisions again. Granted, this may fade with time or I may have a change of heart. As far as the washing machine goes. . . I am teaching the toddler how to use it.

Aylee -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 2:30:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM quote: ORIGINAL: HeartAndSoul31 Absolutely. Although we learn many lessons good and bad in the multiple relationships through our life we have, the more we have that are unsuccessful the further we get from trust. It is very difficult or impossible in some accounts to forget disappointments or betrayals, even if you forgive them. Unfortunately if we have not encountered often integrity, loyalty, trustworthiness, honesty, reliance the first reaction naturally is distrust out of instinct. Take BenevolentM for example. It's very obvious someone has greatly disappointed him. Women are now reduced to only having sexual value. I bet he didn't always have this view.[:D] My views are utilitarian. A honest woman is willing to run a washing machine as if the washing machine were not a competitor of hers. Hypothetically speaking, suppose I had a lot of money. What sort of services could a woman provide me that I could not hire professionals and other servants to provide? For the wealthy such as the Bush family, it is an aire. The real question whether or not I would give money to feminist causes? And here I thought I ran the washing machine in order to clean clothes. Who knew it was my competitor?

HeartAndSoul31 -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 2:41:08 PM)
I believe so, a correlation. It's possible to have to much of both. Both can cause people to put on aires. Don't let either blind you to the "wah whooo" in life. [:D] they are few and far between. I don't give atheists much thought and not sure what you meant by peasant uprisings. I think that's already started.

BenevolentM -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 3:14:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HeartAndSoul31 Both can cause people to put on aires. I cannot disagree with that, but poverty and atheism can also have the same effect, "Look see, my poverty or lack of faith is SUPERIOR!"

BenevolentM -> RE: Do you agree? (8/30/2014 3:25:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee And here I thought I ran the washing machine in order to clean clothes. Who knew it was my competitor? I recall a study many years ago, like in the 1950s, where Betty Crocker created a cake mix. The cake mix was intended to make the lives of house wives easier. It made baking a cake very easy to do. They hired a firm to carry out a psychological study to discover why women weren't interested in buying the product. What they found was that the cake mix made it so easy that it made the women feel guilty. It made them feel they were not working hard enough for their husbands. When Betty Crocker added an additional step where you needed to add an egg, sales went up. Washing machines make women less relevant in the home. Washing machines are indeed a competitor.

thompsonx -> RE: Do you agree? (8/31/2014 5:44:46 AM)
ORIGINAL: BenevolentM Good women like me, bad women don't. Could I trouble you for a list of the "bad women who don't" I have a feeling I might have somthing in common with them.

Lucylastic -> RE: Do you agree? (8/31/2014 6:05:28 AM)
good women =anyone who agrees with him..... there was one a month or two ago, but even she "disapeared"

thompsonx -> RE: Do you agree? (8/31/2014 6:08:45 AM)
ORIGINAL: BenevolentM I recall a study many years ago, like in the 1950s, You do not recall anythng...you are simply making things up.[8\|] where Betty Crocker created a cake mix. Betty crocker damn near went broke in the 50's when cake mix sales flattened out and many manufacturers of that product went out of business.The cake mix was invented and patented in 1933 http://www.bonappetit.com/entertaining-style/pop-culture/article/cake-mix-history. As if betty crocker was a human being and not a korporation. The cake mix was intended to make the lives of house wives easier. The cake mix was intended to take financial advantage of a surplus of mollasses as the cited article points out. It made baking a cake very easy to do. They hired a firm to carry out a psychological study to discover why women weren't interested in buying the product. What they found was that the cake mix made it so easy that it made the women feel guilty. It made them feel they were not working hard enough for their husbands. When Betty Crocker added an additional step where you needed to add an egg, sales went up. Since eggs had been required since 1933 your opinion is simply the ignorant rambling of a misinformed mysoginist. The article cited clearly points out that what boosted the saging sales of cake sales was frosting.

FieryOpal -> RE: Do you agree? (8/31/2014 6:49:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote: ORIGINAL: BenevolentM Good women like me, bad women don't. Could I trouble you for a list of the "bad women who don't" I have a feeling I might have somthing in common with them. I don't think there are any kinky women out there bad enough for you who aren't for hire. [:-] (Whom you can readily procure for yourself, it should go without saying.) quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer She obviously has the hots for you. Nope. I'm holding out for the (unattached) male sub version of freedomdwarf. [;)]

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Do you agree? (8/31/2014 7:10:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FieryOpal ]ORIGINAL: PeonForHer She obviously has the hots for you. Nope. I'm holding out for the (unattached) male sub version of freedomdwarf. [;)] Aaawwwww, shucks Anyone wud fink ya wuvs me [sm=couple.gif][sm=flowers.gif]

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Spam Policy

0.0625