Aylee
Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote:
ORIGINAL: smileforme50 What do you think about racial profiling? Is it totally offensive, or is it just a necessary evil where the authorities are playing the odds for the protection of everyone else? It's a bit of a Damocles Sword - damned if you do and damned if you don't. And I don't think there's an easy answer. Personally speaking, if 90% of the damage is inflicted by 10% of a certain region/religion/colour etc, then by targeting (profiling) that minority is statistically likely to yield better/more results than any random choice. Yes, that minority group might feel offended for such profiling. But hey, the safety of the majority is at stake here! If they are that concerned about the profiling, they should start teaching members of their own group to stop such activities so they are no longer the predominant cause of such disturbances and thus avert attentions to a different group. Hell, if 90% of bombers and suicide attackers are middle-eastern and/or Islamic, they should be targeted. If 90% of burglaries and drug suppliers are committed by blacks, then the stop-and-search tactics should target black people. If the predominance of drunk drivers are under-30 white males, then random stops of those drivers should be welcomed. Just my Quibble: The Sword of Damocles represents the peril that those in positions of great power are always in. I think that you may mean "Catch-22." There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he were sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle. (p. 56, ch. 5)
_____________________________
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.
|