DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri Who is responsible for making sure journalists are safe in a country? Is it the British government's job to maintain safety for each of it's citizens abroad? Is it a government's responsibility, duty, or authority to maintain the safety of each of it's citizens abroad? I feel bad for the families of the journalists. I really do. But, if Britain or the US (kinda moot with the US) goes after IS/ISIS/ISIL because of the beheading(s), isn't it within Russia's responsibility, duty, or authority to defend it's citizens in the Ukraine? And, if it's okay for the US/Britain to attack ISIS for beheading one of our/it's citizens, why haven't we (the US) rooted out the Mexican drug cartel(s) that have beheaded a US citizen? As repulsive as it is, it isn't the beheadings themselves that's cause for alarm, DS. At least, not in my view. It's what they represent. I agree with you that the murdered journalists bear some of the responsibility for going into dangerous territory by choice (if I'm reading you correctly) but I also believe a government should be available to it's citizens abroad. Especially when they are inadvertently caught up in some political or legal issue within that country. Isn't that one reason we have embassies? One question your post raised in my mind is what would we have done if our first view of the Nazis had just been pictures from inside the concentration camps? Don't we have an embassy in Iraq, or Syria? We have 4 in Iraq, and one in Syria. But, we aren't talking about building more embassies. What, in your view, do the beheadings represent?
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|