DaddySatyr -> RE: Culturally, do you feel the need to reverse roles, when reversing roles? (9/21/2014 3:27:17 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SeekingTrinity ~FRing it~ I think I have a problem with the idea of people needing to prove themselves worthy to each other. It's kind of like saying that each person is viewed as worthless coming into it until proven otherwise. Figuring out if you are compatible, that you can trust each other, that you are on the same page as far as what each person is looking for/needing out of the connection...these things Im all for. But then again, this could be Captain Morgan talking [:)] I think the crux of the issue is that phrase ... those words; " ... prove themselves worthy to each other". That's a pretty "offensive" statement. I agree. However, I think a lot of people use wording like that for ease of communication. It's an accessible, "comfortable" way to get the point across. As I said; I despise that word ("prove") when used in the context of interpersonal relationships. Inane distractions aside, if we agree to use that wording, I think it can illustrate - to a degree - the main sticking point. Because of the way the basic dynamic is supposed to work (allegedly, the submissive acquiesces to the whim of the dominant), the dominant is required to "prove themselves worthy" of loyalty, devotion, and things like that. The specifics of how that's done are a matter of individual tastes of both parties. So, here's the dominant, at the munch, in the club, wherever, just going about their life being (/showing people how) trustworthy and honorable (they are) and the submissive takes notice. Now, forgetting a "first move" (who cares who asks whom to dance?), the two (somehow) start communicating. The dominant has already "proven" certain things to the submissive's satisfaction - or, ostensibly, they wouldn't be communicating. This is the time for the submissive to "prove themselves" to the dominant. How? Well, as in almost all things, the devil is in the details and if we go back to a submissive, acquiescing to the dominant, the dominant says: "I hate doing laundry." If doing laundry is acceptable to the submissive, they make that known. Cooking dinner, vacuuming, yard work, oral sex, anal sex, monogamy versus polyamory, whatever; the dominant makes their wants and desires known and the submissive either agrees (things may be taking off) or they disagree (things may crash and burn). So, while I agree that the wording seems harsh and impersonal (almost dehumanizing), I think the concepts may actually be a "given". I think the main bone of contention is how the different parties go about accomplishing those goals and how many people go about expressing them. Screen captures still RULE! Ya feel me?
|
|
|
|