About that Hobby Lobby ruling

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

About that Hobby Lobby ruling

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> About that Hobby Lobby ruling

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/18/2014 4:27:59 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

Now it is being used to protect the worst of the worst in a child labor case.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/hobby-lobby-ruling-vergel-steed?utm_content=buffer092ed&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Profile

Post #: 1

RE: About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/18/2014 5:30:15 PM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

Well dayum that seems to say that if it is a religions practice to behead non believers it is no longer against the law if they really really believe it

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 2

RE: About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/18/2014 7:16:00 PM

DaNewAgeViking

Posts: 1009
Joined: 4/29/2004
Status: offline

Someone ought to make a court case of that, as well as Devil worship, Tuggee, Suttee, ritual canabalism, and armed rebellion for religious causes. It'd be great to watch the Supremes squirm with that one!

(in reply to thompsonx)

Profile

Post #: 3

RE: About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/18/2014 7:19:57 PM

ExiledTyrant

Posts: 4547
Joined: 12/9/2013
From: Exiled
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaNewAgeViking

Someone ought to make a court case of that, as well as Devil worship, Tuggee, Suttee, ritual canabalism, and armed rebellion for religious causes. It'd be great to watch the Supremes squirm with that one!

Exactly. When I drop off the alimony check, I don't get alimony pussy. Isn't alimony to keep her in the lifestyle she became accustomed to? It stands to reason I should hit that pussy as I was accustomed to, right?

_____________________________

Gnothi Seauton
To lead, first follow: Aurelius, Epictetus, Descartes, Sun Tzu, to name a few.

Semper fidelis (which sometimes feels like a burden)

(in reply to DaNewAgeViking)

Profile

Post #: 4

RE: About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/18/2014 7:33:43 PM

DaNewAgeViking

Posts: 1009
Joined: 4/29/2004
Status: offline

Aw now, Exile, you're talking about fairness - that's got nothing to do with it. A suggestion: set yourself up as a church and claim that payments can only be made to acolytes who prostrate themselves in penitent submission. Have a different 'prayer position' for each day of the week. See? Religion does supply all the answers.

(in reply to ExiledTyrant)

Profile

Post #: 5

RE: About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/18/2014 8:05:34 PM

PandoraFoxxx

Posts: 182
Joined: 1/3/2011
From: San Mateo, CA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaNewAgeViking

Aw now, Exile, you're talking about fairness - that's got nothing to do with it. A suggestion: set yourself up as a church and claim that payments can only be made to acolytes who prostrate themselves in penitent submission. Have a different 'prayer position' for each day of the week. See? Religion does supply all the answers.

Don't encourage him, ExiledTyrantism is right up his alley. Complete with acolyte/minions and other men's alimony pussy - and most likely a portion of the alimony $$$$ too

(in reply to DaNewAgeViking)

Profile

Post #: 6

RE: About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/18/2014 10:47:14 PM

DaNewAgeViking

Posts: 1009
Joined: 4/29/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PandoraFoxxx

Don't encourage him, ExiledTyrantism is right up his alley. Complete with acolyte/minions and other men's alimony pussy - and most likely a portion of the alimony $$$$ too

Well - yeah. One can argue what is alimony $$$$ for, I suppose. But let us not be too quick to judge. It is Exiled's religion, after all, and we should practice religious acceptance - religiously.

(in reply to PandoraFoxxx)

Profile

Post #: 7

RE: About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/18/2014 10:54:57 PM

Aylee

Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

Privileged conversation is not a new thing in the justice system.

He also made his 1st amendment objection 5 months before SCOTUS gave their ruling.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to PandoraFoxxx)

Profile

Post #: 8

RE: About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/19/2014 6:51:13 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Privileged conversation is not a new thing in the justice system.

He also made his 1st amendment objection 5 months before SCOTUS gave their ruling.

You do realize that this priviledged conversation you are refering to is who are the scumbag church leaders who exploited child labor. The court contended that since this information could be obtained from public records the court could not compell this douchbag to name them because their names could be found in the public record.

(in reply to Aylee)

Profile

Post #: 9

RE: About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/19/2014 6:53:34 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: DaNewAgeViking

Aw now, Exile, you're talking about fairness - that's got nothing to do with it. A suggestion: set yourself up as a church and claim that payments can only be made to acolytes who prostrate themselves in penitent submission. Have a different 'prayer position' for each day of the week. See? Religion does supply all the answers.

We had a young lady who claimed she was the reincarnated goddess issis and everyone who wanted to join her church had to give her all of their money and perform oral sex on her.
The d.a. charged her with prostitution and grandlarceny and she got about 6 years in state prison.

(in reply to DaNewAgeViking)

Profile

Post #: 10

RE: About that Hobby Lobby ruling - 9/19/2014 9:43:55 AM

DaNewAgeViking

Posts: 1009
Joined: 4/29/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: DaNewAgeViking

Aw now, Exile, you're talking about fairness - that's got nothing to do with it. A suggestion: set yourself up as a church and claim that payments can only be made to acolytes who prostrate themselves in penitent submission. Have a different 'prayer position' for each day of the week. See? Religion does supply all the answers.

We had a young lady who claimed she was the reincarnated goddess issis and everyone who wanted to join her church had to give her all of their money and perform oral sex on her.
The d.a. charged her with prostitution and grandlarceny and she got about 6 years in state prison.

Oppression! That's what it is - religious oppression! Not to worry, however. No doubt the DA and other 'heretics' were rendered impotent, which is only just after all. There's the litmus test for religious free thinkers - ask random strangers to show you their hard-on, and loudly condemn those who can't/won't as being religious oppressors. We'll save the country yet!