RE: "Journalism" These Days (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


GoddessManko -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 12:25:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I wrote, the color of his skin, you moron.


Ah, attack the messenger, not the message, you are well on your way to being a political representative. I'm rooting for ya! [:D]




Gauge -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 12:26:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Was it or wasn't it his skin color


OK, I'll play along...

Yes, it was the color of his skin that brought out a few more black voters because, hey, it was a tiny bit of history for this Nation to have someone who wasn't white as President. The rest believed he was more politically sound than the opposition candidate. Oddly enough, each election was not won by a slim margin, but a significant margin.

So, what exactly is your point about his skin?




dcnovice -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 12:33:32 PM)

quote:

So, what exactly is your point about his skin?

Equally important: What's the evidence for it?




ExiledTyrant -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 12:39:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge

So, what exactly is your point about his skin?


Um... spilled milk for $600.00, Alex.




Sanity -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:39:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Was it or wasn't it his skin color


OK, I'll play along...

Yes, it was the color of his skin that brought out a few more black voters because, hey, it was a tiny bit of history for this Nation to have someone who wasn't white as President. The rest believed he was more politically sound than the opposition candidate. Oddly enough, each election was not won by a slim margin, but a significant margin.

So, what exactly is your point about his skin?


No one knew who he was




Sanity -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:40:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I wrote, the color of his skin, you moron.


Ah, attack the messenger, not the message, you are well on your way to being a political representative. I'm rooting for ya! [:D]


When in Rome




Musicmystery -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:41:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


We elected someone based on the color of his skin because we have an elitist media who thought that was a good idea

Actually we elected Barack Obama because the Republicans ran idiots.

quote:


At the same time, plenty on the left like to rant and rail against FOX News because it is the only conservative or middle-of-the-road network and they cant stand dissent. Can't stand another viewpoint that might rattle their thought process

Not at all. They object to FOX's tendency to invent the news and to confuse commentary (opinion pieces) with journalism.

quote:



I doubt the journalism situation will improve much from here, either

I don't see much hope for that either.




Sanity -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:42:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


We elected someone based on the color of his skin because we have an elitist media who thought that was a good idea

Actually we elected Barack Obama because the Republicans ran idiots.

quote:


At the same time, plenty on the left like to rant and rail against FOX News because it is the only conservative or middle-of-the-road network and they cant stand dissent. Can't stand another viewpoint that might rattle their thought process


quote:



I doubt the journalism situation will improve much from here, either

I don't see much hope for that either.


You call Barack Obama George Bush or some such, Moose man




Gauge -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:43:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

No one knew who he was


And people still voted by overwhelming majority over candidates that were well known. Still not seeing your point.




Musicmystery -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:45:18 PM)

1) I thought your topic was journalism? Aren't you usually whining about people staying on topic?

2) I don't influence the elections -- first we had the McCain/Palin circus, then the Bush-on-Steriods vs. Bush Lite option.

3) I thought you didn't believe in making posts about posters instead of the topic?





Sanity -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:47:29 PM)


Evading the point? [:D]

You call Barack Obama George Bush or some such







Musicmystery -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:50:29 PM)

Not at all -- I just answered your point -- you're whining about Bush Lite, while Republicans ran clowns. That's how he got elected twice.

And me calling him Bush Lite has nothing to do with your OP. I thought you didn't believe in trolling about people instead of topics? I'm flattered, though.




Sanity -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:56:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Not at all -- I just answered your point -- you're whining about Bush Lite, while Republicans ran clowns. That's how he got elected twice.

And me calling him Bush Lite has nothing to do with your OP. I thought you didn't believe in trolling about people instead of topics? I'm flattered, though.


You just too blind to see how it ties right in







Musicmystery -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:57:06 PM)

...in which case I'm not evading the point.

See how that works?




Sanity -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 1:58:36 PM)


If you are not being purposely obtuse I feel really sorry for you




Musicmystery -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 2:01:11 PM)

My thoughts on your posts exactly.

Nicely summarized.

[image]http://www.uniqueholidaygiftideas.com/images/thinking-smiley.jpg[/image]




Sanity -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 2:06:05 PM)


Want a nice summary

You, the entire leftist nation, and many in the middle were sold what you call "George Bush" when you thought you were buying something entirely different

No one likes the fool save for other fools

And we have a far left sycophant media that no longer does its job to blame




Musicmystery -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 2:19:38 PM)

Nope. Bush Lite won because the Republicans couldn't offer any viable choice -- first the McCain/Palin circus, then the Bush-on-Steriods nonsense (even the right wing media noted their penchant for gross factual misrepresentation). Especially the second term, he should have been beatable.

The media is a mess--FOX among them, but there hasn't been journalism in this country for a few decades.





thompsonx -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 2:26:39 PM)


ORIGINAL: Sanity


We elected someone based on the color of his skin because we have an elitist media who thought that was a good idea

Do you just open your mouth to change feet?
One would think that a grown right wing asshole would know that presidents in the u.s. are appointed. It says so right in the constitution. You know the part about the electoral college.
We have been appointing presidents based on the color of their skin since george washington. Should you ever acquire access to a history book written for someone beyond the fifth grade you might look it up. every one of dem punks was a white guy...well up until this one. He acts just like the previous white guys so whats your beef?
Do you always have a big bowl of stupid for breakfast?




Sanity -> RE: "Journalism" These Days (9/28/2014 2:28:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Nope. Bush Lite won because the Republicans couldn't offer any viable choice -- first the McCain/Palin circus, then the Bush-on-Steriods nonsense (even the right wing media noted their penchant for gross factual misrepresentation). Especially the second term, he should have been beatable.

The media is a mess--FOX among them, but there hasn't been journalism in this country for a few decades.




No, because the Republicans are constantly slammed and maligned by the far left media, and Bush Jr was held up as the messiah

The second coming of Ghandi, MLK, JFK and Lincoln all rolled into one

Forget the Republican choice that you are so obsessed over, thats beside the point. Why didnt the Dems nominate someone who was more known

Why wasnt Barack Obama properly vetted

Dog knows they vetted the holy shit out of all the Republicans you mentioned, no closet went unopened




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625