|
BitYakin -> RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any other weapon than to avoid violence with a firearm? (10/6/2014 5:28:19 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:
ORIGINAL: BitYakin
quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
You, on the other hand, are not like this.
You believe -
You need a gun... for defense. You think you are defenseless and a numpty if you don't have one.
You need a gun... to deter would-be thieves and criminals. You don't believe anything less will do.
You need a gun... to attack first. Because to do otherwise means they'll get the jump on you and you're dead.
You need a gun... because... you can't think beyond the end of a muzzle. You can't comprehend a life without one.
You need a gun... because the constitution and the law says you can and have the right to. And by golly, you'll exercise that right... just because you can, and will.
You need to give back your mind reading certificate, wrong on every count.
It is too late to talk about level headed gun owners you already declared all gun owners to be crazy.
You have proved your motives, intentions and total gun mindset through many of your posts.
I declared that people like you, with your type of mindset, are crazy and irresponsible - not everyone.
We speak to quite a few people in the US and they don't react like you have described that you do.
To quote our friend in NC, he said "that man is a nutter and shouldn't be allowed to own a gun".
Wrong on every count?? I don't think so.
I'm not the only one that has made such a comment and most of those similar comments have come from US posters.
sorry but NO YOU DID NOT you said and I QUOTE
"So wanting a deadly weapon like a gun is just crazy... and stupid... and unnecessary."
I see no qualifier such as "like YOU" or LIKE THEM" or LIKE anyone, you made a FLAT BLANKET STAMENT that covers EVERYONE said they were CRAZY & STUPID if they wanted a gun..
So put that into context of what was said before.... let me remind you from post#41-
And it was a conclusion to Bama's comment -
"The problem with stopping stupid people is the folks who think that wanting a gun proves you are stupid"
To which I replied -
"And in an awful lot of cases, that would be correct - and proven by the daily gun deaths and mass slaughters."
And if you could comprehend English instead of spin and stuff taken out of context, that response is saying that I think Bama (and a lot of other people) are stupid for wanting guns because of their attitude and outlook.
And my finale concluded with -
"Many people, even in the US, can live their lives without a gun and not wanting one.
It has also been proven that to carry a gun is more likely to get you injured or dead. "
followed by that last line of -
"So wanting a deadly weapon like a gun is just crazy... and stupid... and unnecessary."
Now... add that to my earlier comments to Bama in post#21 -
"Your antagonistic outlook makes you a dangerous person to own and carry a gun.
Your 'attack first' and confrontational attitude means you do not carry responsibly either.
You are a delusional gun nut.
I wouldn't trust you with a crayon, let alone a gun!!"
Put it all together, in the right order, and you get a comment and opinion on Bama - not a blanket statement for everyone. It just proves that you either can't read or you didn't read the whole thread and jumped to a moronic conclusion... as usual.
ETA: quote:
ORIGINAL: BitYakin
he once claimed he hated the usa cause we weren't allowed to drive over 30 or 40 MPH, then went onto tell us about this "friends" who NEVER drove above 30 MPH or some other idiotic speed...
*IF* you were paying attention, I said the max speed limit I came across was 55mph.
I never claimed that the US max speed was that; only that it was the max I'd seen.
And yes, my friends that I sat shotgun with never went over 30mph even in the 55mph limit.
I can't help that - it's what they do.
If you go faster.... bully for you. It's not how they choose to drive.
Foot-in-mouth syndrome much??? [8|]
quote:
ORIGINAL: BitYakin
but its good to know you value the life of a thug/thief/rapist over your children's safety
I don't hold such a view and I never claimed such nonsense.
Your words, your spin. Not mine.
Foot-in-mouth again or is it head-up-ass this time???
yes context is a nice thing, since we are being all LITERATE and all, the last line of any statement is considered a CONCLUSION...
you conclude with a statement that includes ALL PEOPLE, which in no way specifies people LIKE HIM
typo, misspoke, poor literacy explain any way you like, I just went by YOUR WORDS!
sorry NOOO it wasn't 55 it was quite a bit lower and NOOO I am not wasting MY time hunting down your post...
pure revisionist story telling on your part, because in response to your post I posted a PICTURE of a speed limit sign showing it was 55 in an inner city area on a highway...
why would I show you a picture of a 55 mph speed limit sign if you had said the limit was 55?
PS, since the MIN speed limit is 40 on a highway I have to conclude either they NEVER DRIVE on a highway or they have gotten ALOT OF TICKETS for impeding the flow of traffic
and once gain I just went by YOUR WORDS, NOTHING, that's the word YOU used, I assume children are SOMETHING, is worth killing someone over...
so its not a SPIN, its what YOU SAID
|
|
|
|
