Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any other weapon than to avoid violence with a firearm?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any other weapon than to avoid violence with a firearm? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 7:47:11 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
No the contention has been made, in effect, that it is morally superior and more socially aware to beat an assailant with a club, than to frighten them off with a firearm.

Your words, nobody else's... because that's how you think.... illogically.
You can frighten people off without a gun.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
I don't think anyone wants crazy people to have guns.

But you have millions of them.
The daily guns deaths prove that every day.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
The problem with stopping stupid people is the folks who think that wanting a gun proves you are stupid

And in an awful lot of cases, that would be correct - and proven by the daily gun deaths and mass slaughters.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
(of course many think it also proves you are crazy)

See above.

Many people, even in the US, can live their lives without a gun and not wanting one.
It has also been proven that to carry a gun is more likely to get you injured or dead.
So wanting a deadly weapon like a gun is just crazy... and stupid... and unnecessary.



_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 8:17:21 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Your words, nobody else's... because that's how you think.... illogically.
You can frighten people off without a gun.

That is not what I said. You told me it was better to injure someone with a yard broom than to scare them off with a gun. I say that is stupid.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 8:21:28 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Many people, even in the US, can live their lives without a gun and not wanting one.
It has also been proven that to carry a gun is more likely to get you injured or dead.
So wanting a deadly weapon like a gun is just crazy... and stupid... and unnecessary.


Go back and see why Pizza Hut didn't want to deliver here, and tell me what good a 2x4 would do in that situation. Also why it is crazy if you live somewhere where such things happen.

So crazy is anyone who disagrees with you.

I know you will say that isn't what you said but you just declared that not agreeing with you on guns means you are crazy.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 9:15:51 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
So wanting a deadly weapon like a gun is just crazy... and stupid... and unnecessary.

With this statement you forfeit any chance of reaching any common ground with any gun owner. This is how I have seen you from day one.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 9:59:48 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

So wanting a deadly weapon like a gun is just crazy... and stupid... and unnecessary.

With this statement you forfeit any chance of reaching any common ground with any gun owner. This is how I have seen you from day one.

A lot of gun owners are level-headed, sensible, and choose to make a peaceful decision long before they think of a gun.
And many also choose not to have a gun and they still live nice peaceful lives - even in the US.
Many people avoid confrontation and trouble before it begins - without a gun.

You, on the other hand, are not like this.
You believe -
You need a gun... for defense. You think you are defenseless and a numpty if you don't have one.
You need a gun... to deter would-be thieves and criminals. You don't believe anything less will do.
You need a gun... to attack first. Because to do otherwise means they'll get the jump on you and you're dead.
You need a gun... because... you can't think beyond the end of a muzzle. You can't comprehend a life without one.
You need a gun... because the constitution and the law says you can and have the right to. And by golly, you'll exercise that right... just because you can, and will.

You are the sort of person that would confront someone who happened to wander onto your front lawn... because you can and have the right to do it with your gun... so you do, without thinking.
You don't consider that you could just leave them to wander back off it and continue on their way peacefully.
Or possibly just holler a polite comment like "GET OFF MY FUCKING LAWN YOU DUMBASS MOTHERFUCKER!!".
You are the sort of person that would fell a neighbour's tree because it had the audacity to grow a branch that overhangs your back yard.... because you can. You wouldn't think of chatting nicely to the neighbour about it.

Your first thoughts are confrontation with your gun... because you can't think of anything else.
Even if there are many other ways to resolve the issue, you don't/can't think of any because your first thoughts are "gun" and what you can do with it - good or bad.
Many gun owners don't think like that - even those we know and chat to regularly in the US.
That mindset makes you a dangerous person.

_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 10:14:29 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
You, on the other hand, are not like this.
You believe -
You need a gun... for defense. You think you are defenseless and a numpty if you don't have one.
You need a gun... to deter would-be thieves and criminals. You don't believe anything less will do.
You need a gun... to attack first. Because to do otherwise means they'll get the jump on you and you're dead.
You need a gun... because... you can't think beyond the end of a muzzle. You can't comprehend a life without one.
You need a gun... because the constitution and the law says you can and have the right to. And by golly, you'll exercise that right... just because you can, and will.


You need to give back your mind reading certificate, wrong on every count.
It is too late to talk about level headed gun owners you already declared all gun owners to be crazy.


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 10:28:59 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Your first thoughts are confrontation with your gun... because you can't think of anything else.
Even if there are many other ways to resolve the issue, you don't/can't think of any because your first thoughts are "gun" and what you can do with it - good or bad.
Many gun owners don't think like that - even those we know and chat to regularly in the US.
That mindset makes you a dangerous person.


Again you demonstrate that you don't understand the first thing about me.
I don't think like that, but you believe I do because I don't accept your jaundiced view of the subject.
Did you check to see why Pizza Hut wasn't delivering here?
Did you come up with how talking or you +5 2x4 would be of any use, and remember that happened very close to my house.
If I was the person you insist that I am I would have shot 4 or five people.
To avoid the situation what d you want me to do, cede control of my property and hide in the closet?
Are you stupid enough to think that I go for a gun every time someone steps on my grass?
How many time should I be hit, shot, or stabbed before it is ok to do something?
I have only even drawn my firearm once and that was because the guy was running right at me and only 20 ft away. I didn't fire, I didn't even point it at him, but it stopped him so I had time to talk to him.


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 10:35:07 PM   
ThirdWheelWanted


Posts: 391
Joined: 4/23/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Dwarf Wrote: I have crack heads living less than 500 yards from me - a whole fucking street full of drunken kossovan nutters.
I can assure you that walking down there with my 2x4 with nails seems to keep them at arms length - drunk, stoned, or sober.



That sounds like you are the one who goes looking for trouble.



Funny, walking down the street with a 2x4 full of sharpened nails in your hand would get your ass arrested in the US. I'm pretty sure the police would have a lot to say about your improvised spear as well. Guess it's cause we're just not as "civilized" as the UK.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 10:39:19 PM   
subrosaDom


Posts: 724
Joined: 2/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

ink.... illogically.
You can frighten people off without a gun.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
I don't think anyone wants crazy people to have guns.

But you have millions of them.
The daily guns deaths prove that every day.





What do the daily knife deaths, auto accident deaths and drowning deaths then prove?

_____________________________

The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.

- Nietzsche

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 10:49:07 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Finally a couple of sane people show up.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to subrosaDom)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 10:52:22 PM   
ThirdWheelWanted


Posts: 391
Joined: 4/23/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
But then I would like to know why FD lives in a neighborhood with crackheads.

Because they moved in with the latest influx of EU migrants about 3 years ago.

Same thing that happened to me except that ours were homegrown.
The owner of the house diagonal from me turned it into gangbanger wannabe HQ, it was like he wouldn't rent to anyone without a criminal record, cops were over there a couple times a week.
New owner, better renters, as of this month. The good guys are starting to win.


This sounds like where I live. My township is East Fallowfield, which is a nice area, but it's right next door to the town of Coatesville which is a shit hole. It wasn't too terrible when we first got here, but it's gone steadily down hill for years, and my street is within walking distance of the worst parts.

Kdsub made the contention that many pro-gun supporters live in areas where they are personally unaffected by crime/violence. In my case, that's just not true. I live less then an hour from Philly, which has a VERY high crime rate and incidence of violence, both with and without guns. Coatesville is a town where I prefer not to go during the day, and drive way out of my way to avoid at night. I've also been involved in a number of attempted crimes over the years; push-in robbery, mugging, car-jacking, assault. My particular favorite was when a the young woman who was working for us as a home health aid stole my wife's credit card charged hundreds of dollars worth of good before we realized, and then threatened to have us killed by her gang-member boyfriend if we pressed charges.

I choose to carry. I've done so for 8ish years, and never had to shoot anyone or even draw it. The most I've ever had to do was lift my shirt and make it clear I was armed. That's happened twice, the car-jacking and the mugging. Both times were defused without further incident and everyone walked away safe and unharmed. Others may disagree, but I consider that a win.

< Message edited by ThirdWheelWanted -- 10/4/2014 11:01:54 PM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/4/2014 11:03:29 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThirdWheelWanted


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
But then I would like to know why FD lives in a neighborhood with crackheads.

Because they moved in with the latest influx of EU migrants about 3 years ago.

Same thing that happened to me except that ours were homegrown.
The owner of the house diagonal from me turned it into gangbanger wannabe HQ, it was like he wouldn't rent to anyone without a criminal record, cops were over there a couple times a week.
New owner, better renters, as of this month. The good guys are starting to win.


This sounds like where I live. My township is East Fallowfield, which is a nice area, but it's right next door to the town of Coatesville which is a shit hole. It wasn't too terrible when we first got here, but it's gone steadily down hill for years, and my street is within walking distance of the worst parts.

Kdsub made the contention that many pro-gun supporters live in areas where they are personally unaffected by crime/violence. In my case, that's just not true. I live less then an hour from Philly, which has a VERY high crime rate and incidence of violence, both with and without guns. Coatesville is a town where I prefer not to go during the day, and drive way out of my way to avoid at night. I've also been involved in a number of attempted crime over the years; push-in robbery, mugging, car-jacking, assault. My particular favorite was when a the young woman who was working for us as a home health aid stole my wife's credit card charged hundreds of dollars worth of good before we realized, and then threatened to have us killed by her gang-member boyfriend if we pressed charges.

I choose to carry. I've done so for 8ish years, and never had to shoot anyone or even draw it. The most I've ever had to do was lift my shirt and make it clear I was armed. That's happened twice, the car-jacking and the mugging. Both times were defused without further incident and everyone walked away safe and unharmed. Others may disagree, but I consider that a win.

The only time I have actually removed my gun from the holster was a couple of weeks ago when a guy came running at me from behind a tree in my yard about 20 ft from me, too close and moving too fast for me to discuss it with him.
Never even pointed it at him but he froze, fortunately cause three more steps and he would have run smack into my rottweiler who I was walking at the time (4:30 AM)
Turned out he was taking a short cut so I am real glad it didn't get worse.
Other than that, like you putting my hand on my gun and never moving it was all that was needed to alter peoples intentions.
The 2x4 would at least get you disturbing the peace, if not worse.
They must have nice criminals in the UK won't hurt you unless you make them.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to ThirdWheelWanted)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/5/2014 1:51:16 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThirdWheelWanted
I choose to carry. I've done so for 8ish years, and never had to shoot anyone or even draw it. The most I've ever had to do was lift my shirt and make it clear I was armed. That's happened twice, the car-jacking and the mugging. Both times were defused without further incident and everyone walked away safe and unharmed. Others may disagree, but I consider that a win.


That looks like a win to me too. It is hard to argue that in the hands of a competent, responsible, law-abiding person a gun isn't likely to be a pretty compelling and useful tool to use in self defence.

But, there does seem to be a fair whack of evidence that carrying a gun is more likely place you in danger than not. For example this study (http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301409?journalCode=ajph&) found a strong correlation between higher levels of gun ownership and homicide rates - although they make it clear that they cannot find a causal link.





_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to ThirdWheelWanted)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/5/2014 1:58:27 AM   
subrosaDom


Posts: 724
Joined: 2/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Finally a couple of sane people show up.


Ya! Tank Gawd dey cured me attya Sanitorrium! (draws machine gun)

... that, at least, is how I think freedomdwarf perceives me.



_____________________________

The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.

- Nietzsche

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/5/2014 2:00:43 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
I thought this might be a curious discussion. On a topic far different than what it has become. Another 'gun supporting thread by BamaD'....what else is new?

I mean this in all sincerity BamaD: Do you understand that the material you show here does sound crazy, illogical, and dangerous? There are good reasons for owning a firearm (having a freedom) and negative reasons for a firearm (a prison). People have guns for target, competition, historical, and even self defense (enjoying a freedom). And people have guns to defend themselves due to their paranoid schizophrenia snapping into high gear (a prison). One whom can not tell which instance they are in, would be best not having such a tool so handily around them. That situations do arise that could easily be handled in a dozen other ways. If your so 'of need' of a firearm, because your afraid of something bad happening to you, answer me this:

Do you wear an NBC suit 24/7?

A Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical warefare suit? Lets face the reality here. Your more likely to be exposed to sunlight alittle to long, then dealing with some nut trying to rob you (the effects can be life threating). Your more likely to obtain a more deadly strain of the flu (last year's had two major bugs running loose in the USA), then someone attacking you in broad daylight. And its a sad fact, but chemicals can mix at the wrong time creating severe problems on the human body. If your so concern about your body's health, wouldn't it make sense to keep your mind and body healthy? To keep things in perspective, logical, and most of all...sane?

I can understand having a passion fore firearms. One of my many passions is good video games. But doing it to much. Obsessing over it. Sacrificing life for the game. Are the things that make up someone suffering more internally. How often do you see me bitching about Battlefield 4? A game I didn't get to play for one minute after purchasing it. Never, because I keep that passion controlled, in check, and responsible. A firearm is a device that requires responsibility to handle safely. When you talk, respond and even create new threads; it feels like your out of control. You can understand why people might get concern over the nature of your posting, right?

I've disagreed with you on the 2nd amendment. Its not an individual right to a firearm (or any other weapon), without responsibility or limit. You can not ignore the first half of the 2nd amendment because its politically inconvenient to you. I asked you (and all the other conservatives) if the US Government or other Americans could ignore half of the 8th and reinterpret the remainder however they wanted. Not a single person on this forum said "ok with that". If its not 'ok' for the 8th, nor twenty-five amendments,....WHY.....would it be 'ok' for the 2nd? Now, if your arms were part of 'A well regulated militia...', I wouldn't have a problem. Since that means someone somewhere, is in a position of credibility and responsibility with power in allowing you said arms. So if you went off the deep end, and they did nothing, given the warning signs, their goose is cooked! If you don't wish to be in that '...well regulated militia..." that is find too: but your arms are not protected under the 2nd amendment. Your arms would be subject to the 10th amendment.

You can be a good guy, BamaD. The question is, can you reflect on what others say and be honest to yourself? You don't have to admit anything on here. Might do you good, to consider the idea and not who it is from. I think most of us would enjoy a good, healthy discussion on the 2nd amendment in different situations. But like BDSM, it has to be kept sane, safe, and consensual. The idea of 'topic' that you give here, sounds like an interesting one. But it is to each of us, not to get the topic off track with pettiness, silly and stupid crap.

I've dealt with people that have used their fists on up to firearms. Each encounter was not pleasant. Would a gun have helped in all the situations? Not really. In some of them, it would have made matters worst. In one case, talking down a suicidal marine with a gun, would have been absolutely stupid. There is no one tool that handles all problems. But knowing when to apply the right tool, at the right time, for the right reasons, is not as easily as it sounds. And if your still having trouble, consider the following....


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/5/2014 2:38:56 AM   
DerangedUnit


Posts: 660
Joined: 2/23/2007
Status: offline
had a cousin who was killed with a broomstick... had cousins killed with guns. i vote it's the same either way... actually a gun sounds a lot less painful. but assuming the harm equal the method is as well.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/5/2014 2:47:37 AM   
ThirdWheelWanted


Posts: 391
Joined: 4/23/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

I have crack heads living less than 500 yards from me - a whole fucking street full of drunken kossovan nutters.
I can assure you that walking down there with my 2x4 with nails seems to keep them at arms length - drunk, stoned, or sober.



Something else I've been thinking about. We're constantly being told how ignorant and violent we Americans are. How our "gun culture" is dangerous and we're paranoid, and if only we'd do the sensible thing and get rid of guns we'd be far better off. (I'm paraphrasing, but that does seem to be the gist) So why is it that in the sensible and civilized UK, you don't feel safe walking down the street unless you're armed with an improvised morning-star? (And why do the police there allow this?) Or feel the need to keep other improvised weapons always within arms reach? Either the UK is a lot more dangerous place then other posters here have led us to believe, or maybe you're the paranoid one?

You're calling Bama a redneck. He carries a pistol concealed in a holster. You're walking down the street with a spiked club over your shoulder to, by your own admission, intimidate your neighbors. I know which one of those I'd call a dangerous redneck, but of course you're the civilized one because you don't like guns.

< Message edited by ThirdWheelWanted -- 10/5/2014 2:57:12 AM >

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/5/2014 3:08:24 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

Ya! Tank Gawd dey cured me attya Sanitorrium! (draws machine gun)



In polite society, those are referred to as: "Chicago Typewriters". You're sooooo uncivilized, sD.







Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to subrosaDom)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/5/2014 3:15:35 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
They must have nice criminals in the UK won't hurt you unless you make them.


While this is plainly a very stupid thing to say, there is an underlying point (which I've no doubt that Bama missed) and that is that because of the very low levels of gun ownership by both law-abiding citizens and criminals in the UK, the likelihood of encountering a thug with a gun is very very low, so the need to have a gun to defend yourself is correspondingly low. I hasten to add that this is not intended to be a dig, the low level of gun ownership isn't down to any moral, cultural or ethical superiority - it's an accident of history. So the question might be - "Would allowing every UK citizen to carry a gun make British people safer ?" I believe the answer to that question is no.

The US is different, however, gun ownership (whether it's a legal, registered, gun or an illegal unregistered gun) is much much higher.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any oth... - 10/5/2014 3:20:08 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

ink.... illogically.
You can frighten people off without a gun.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
I don't think anyone wants crazy people to have guns.

But you have millions of them.
The daily guns deaths prove that every day.





What do the daily knife deaths, auto accident deaths and drowning deaths then prove?


They prove that there are lots of ways to die.

What was the actual point you that you were attempting to make?



_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to subrosaDom)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Anyone agree that it is better to harm with any other weapon than to avoid violence with a firearm? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.117