RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries?

RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries?

US airports should have closed airports from Ebola ravaged countries.

29% (13)

The US should immediately close airports from Ebola ravished countries

38% (17)

We should never close airports from any country.

11% (5)

What the hell is going to happen next in this country?

4% (2)

I could care less, until the US has at least 100 cases of Ebola

6% (3)

I am not worried, I will never get Ebola.

4% (2)

I am worried, and I have no idea what I should do.

4% (2)

Total Votes : 44

(last vote on : 11/4/2014 8:15:41 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

Aylee -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 9:20:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity I don't have him on hide but I skip over his posts as a matter of habit because reading his writings is a complete waste of my time His posts are typically very predictable, very immature, and practically everyone else ignores them anyway, making a reply unwarranted When Sanity and I agree on something you know it is likely true and the end is near. Although I long ago put tommy on hide. I have him on hide because he plays stupid question games that go no where and never make a point. I only see him if someone quotes him.

BamaD -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 10:13:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity I don't have him on hide but I skip over his posts as a matter of habit because reading his writings is a complete waste of my time His posts are typically very predictable, very immature, and practically everyone else ignores them anyway, making a reply unwarranted When Sanity and I agree on something you know it is likely true and the end is near. Although I long ago put tommy on hide. I have him on hide because he plays stupid question games that go no where and never make a point. I only see him if someone quotes him. Same here, although I should point out that from a strict constructionist view, and I pointed this out last week. The government has the power to regulate immigration and to keep threats out of the country. I might also point out that the CDC has been totally useless in this, giving conflicting information and telling the nurse that flying on the plane was fine just before she came down with ebola.

DomKen -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 10:39:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity I don't have him on hide but I skip over his posts as a matter of habit because reading his writings is a complete waste of my time His posts are typically very predictable, very immature, and practically everyone else ignores them anyway, making a reply unwarranted When Sanity and I agree on something you know it is likely true and the end is near. Although I long ago put tommy on hide. I have him on hide because he plays stupid question games that go no where and never make a point. I only see him if someone quotes him. Same here, although I should point out that from a strict constructionist view, and I pointed this out last week. The government has the power to regulate immigration and to keep threats out of the country. I might also point out that the CDC has been totally useless in this, giving conflicting information and telling the nurse that flying on the plane was fine just before she came down with ebola. The CDC was right. There was no harm in her flying as long as she had no symptoms. Please return to reality. I'll repeat this again, Ebola can only be spread by the bodily fluids of someone who is symptomatic.

Sanity -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 10:45:08 AM)
Obama came out against states placing civilian medical staff who have been directly exposed to the virus under quarantine, while the Pentagon which reports directly to him has ordered a quarantine for all troops returning from W. Africa

BamaD -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 10:49:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Obama came out against states placing civilian medical staff who have been directly exposed to the virus under quarantine, while the Pentagon which reports directly to him has ordered a quarantine for all troops returning from W. Africa They act like they don't have a clue.

Lucylastic -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 10:54:06 AM)
yeah thats why there are SO many cases of ebola spreading thru the US they know nothing . all the chicken littles back under your rocks please Or at least go along with your precious claims and fight for shutting down the airports for all US travel inside and outside the country.

mnottertail -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 10:59:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Obama came out against states placing civilian medical staff who have been directly exposed to the virus under quarantine, while the Pentagon which reports directly to him has ordered a quarantine for all troops returning from W. Africa You have an actual credible citation of this? (I know that answer is no) because I actually listened to what he said, and he did not 'come out against' any such a thing. This is pure nutsuckerism, and very heavily manufactured by the nutsuckers in full fall felch.

stef -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 11:29:12 AM)
Wait until flu season kicks in and all the the rightwingnut Ebola hysteria ramps up to a full head of steam.

PeonForHer -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 11:39:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stef Wait until flu season kicks in and all the the rightwingnut Ebola hysteria ramps up to a full head of steam. Yep. Oh gawd, that's a thought.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 3:30:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD Same here, although I should point out that from a strict constructionist view, and I pointed this out last week. The government has the power to regulate immigration and to keep threats out of the country. I might also point out that the CDC has been totally useless in this, giving conflicting information and telling the nurse that flying on the plane was fine just before she came down with ebola. How many people were infected by her traveling? If there haven't been any cases stemming from her flying, then, perhaps, the CDC happened to be right?

BamaD -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 3:47:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD Same here, although I should point out that from a strict constructionist view, and I pointed this out last week. The government has the power to regulate immigration and to keep threats out of the country. I might also point out that the CDC has been totally useless in this, giving conflicting information and telling the nurse that flying on the plane was fine just before she came down with ebola. How many people were infected by her traveling? If there haven't been any cases stemming from her flying, then, perhaps, the CDC happened to be right? Or maybe just lucky

Lucylastic -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 4:11:42 PM)
Someone repost this please for bama as he is ignoring me again. If it was spread by unluck, luck...or chance, there would be a kajillion cases...they certainly know better than politicians and ....random internet people guessing its magic

Aylee -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 4:57:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Obama came out against states placing civilian medical staff who have been directly exposed to the virus under quarantine, while the Pentagon which reports directly to him has ordered a quarantine for all troops returning from W. Africa You have an actual credible citation of this? (I know that answer is no) because I actually listened to what he said, and he did not 'come out against' any such a thing. This is pure nutsuckerism, and very heavily manufactured by the nutsuckers in full fall felch. Yep, White House press secretary Josh Earnest, is such a nutsacker. Whatever that is.

PeonForHer -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 7:36:54 PM)
Ron, quick aside, could you give us quick glossary? A nutsacker is a disciple of St Wrinklemeat - right?

Greta75 -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/30/2014 7:40:09 PM)
Australia's act is criticized as being very selfish. I guess it's one of those things. If there is a Zombie Apocalypse, spread by a virus, and it may not be airborne, and could be through liquids, so the zombie actually has to bite you to spread to you, and if there is a 3 weeks incubation period before someone shows up if they got zombified or not, should countries allow all the non-zombiefied people in from Zombie virus ridden countries to save them, or completely close their borders and screw all the countries with zombie problems, and shut everybody out. We already know Australia's reaction to that.

slvemike4u -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/31/2014 6:25:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Someone repost this please for bama as he is ignoring me again. If it was spread by unluck, luck...or chance, there would be a kajillion cases...they certainly know better than politicians and ....random internet people guessing its magic There you go Lucy.reposted as requested [:)]

Lucylastic -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/31/2014 6:32:05 AM)
Im so glad you are back honey:) Hugggs LOL I dont expect any response. not a good one anyway

mnottertail -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/31/2014 7:57:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Obama came out against states placing civilian medical staff who have been directly exposed to the virus under quarantine, while the Pentagon which reports directly to him has ordered a quarantine for all troops returning from W. Africa You have an actual credible citation of this? (I know that answer is no) because I actually listened to what he said, and he did not 'come out against' any such a thing. This is pure nutsuckerism, and very heavily manufactured by the nutsuckers in full fall felch. Yep, White House press secretary Josh Earnest, is such a nutsacker. Whatever that is. Where is the actual quote from Josh Earnest? Not in that horseshit.

Musicmystery -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/31/2014 8:54:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 Australia's act is criticized as being very selfish. I guess it's one of those things. If there is a Zombie Apocalypse, spread by a virus, and it may not be airborne, and could be through liquids, so the zombie actually has to bite you to spread to you, and if there is a 3 weeks incubation period before someone shows up if they got zombified or not, should countries allow all the non-zombiefied people in from Zombie virus ridden countries to save them, or completely close their borders and screw all the countries with zombie problems, and shut everybody out. We already know Australia's reaction to that. Except that Ebola is not airborne, and is not being spread by people biting each other. Fear of Ebola, though, is being spread by willful ignorance and bizarre misinformation. I'm thinking policy probably should go for a more fact-based approach.

Sanity -> RE: Should the US close airports from Ebola ravaged countries? (10/31/2014 3:01:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Except that Ebola is not airborne, and is not being spread by people biting each other. Fear of Ebola, though, is being spread by willful ignorance and bizarre misinformation. I'm thinking policy probably should go for a more fact-based approach. Bizarre misinformation, spread by the CDC.

Page: << < prev 15 16 [17] 18 19 next > >>

Spam Policy

0.078125