Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Content of Character: 0


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Content of Character: 0 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 8:35:27 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
You haven't actually written anything, you have slobbered, and spouted geysers of the most imbecilic doggerel here, but havent had a thought that would occupy the level of even a dung beetle.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 9:06:09 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

And he doesn't get that black people don't speak with one voice. After all, they're all black, right? So of course, they all think alike, just like all white people do.

Good thing he's so open-minded and aware.




I didn't write anything like that

Too bad you people are such morons, such stupid lowlife trolls that you are unable to debate what is actually written

Of course you did. King remarked on content of character once in a speech, and you label yourself a devote while questioning while anyone of color would see things differently than King did.

Too bad your black/white left/right you/trolls view of the world blinds you.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 9:19:20 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

And he doesn't get that black people don't speak with one voice. After all, they're all black, right? So of course, they all think alike, just like all white people do.

Good thing he's so open-minded and aware.




I didn't write anything like that

Too bad you people are such morons, such stupid lowlife trolls that you are unable to debate what is actually written

Of course you did. King remarked on content of character once in a speech, and you label yourself a devote while questioning while anyone of color would see things differently than King did.

Too bad your black/white left/right you/trolls view of the world blinds you.


No. The only one who wrote anything LIKE that is you

I wrote rioters around the St Lois area

Nothing like all blacks, that was your ugly inner racist trying to project your own slimy vileness onto me

I am sure there are as as many blacks as there are whites as a percentage who see a problem with rioters taking the side with someone due to color alone in a knee jerk fashion

I have no doubt about that

You are a coward when it comes to discussing race relations. Dare to bring up a legitimate issue and you go from zero to troll in the blink of an eye





_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 9:31:23 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
So you are calling the white nutsucker rioters of StL out? Whadda fuckin Guy! Hah?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 10:39:20 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
At least he's consistently funny.

In a sad sort of way.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 10:56:25 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Hilarious to the trolls, perhaps, that MLK's dream of having people judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin falls on deaf ears in St Lois today

Just because the young man who died after taking several shots at an off duty cop was black is reason to riot?

Really?

The facts make the racist trolls here uncomfortable so they do their best to derail

Much easier than thinking

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 11:21:47 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline


And *you* think "that's not what anyone said."

Another frustrated fiction writer who can't sell his novel.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 11:24:31 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Hilarious to the trolls, perhaps, that MLK's dream of having people judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin falls on deaf ears in St Lois today

Just because the young man who died after taking several shots at an off duty cop was black is reason to riot?

Really?

The facts make the racist trolls here uncomfortable so they do their best to derail

Much easier than thinking



Why do you say the guy was black, are you judging the content of his character or the color of his skin?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 11:38:16 AM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Gauge

No, it is what is common practice for police officers.
It is what they refer to as an Extra Job.

Is that why they have to have special permission in writting to have this extra job?


It is completely allowed for them to participate in working for a private security company or local establishment as security. They are not officially working for their department but are still allowed to make arrests and yes, even enforce the law if need be.

Since cops are cops 24/7 they are wearing their cop uniform and using their cop authority and their cop gun and badge while working for a second paycheck. Not all jurrisdictions allow this.



Perfectly above board, legal, common knowledge amongst the civilians and not unethical.

In my country cops are civilians by law.

Before commenting on something, please try to understand what it is you are commenting on.

You clearly need to follow your own advice.




Look Sunshine, I will definitely keep quiet when I don't know something. Oddly enough, you didn't prove me wrong, you simply gave more details about what the practice is all about.

I know you like to believe you are right all the time, but this time you supported my point, not ripped it apart.

_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 11:40:18 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Sanity

No. The only one who wrote anything LIKE that is you

I wrote rioters around the St Lois area


If you had any evidence that the rioters were other than black you would be able to post it. Since you can't produce any such evidence to shield you from the obvious racism in your post it would follow that the poster approves of his post.


Nothing like all blacks, that was your ugly inner racist trying to project your own slimy vileness onto me

But you are the one who points out a supposed inconsistancy in the thought paterns of blacks.

I am sure there are as as many blacks as there are whites as a percentage who see a problem with rioters taking the side with someone due to color alone in a knee jerk fashion

If you are sure of that perhaps you might link us to the source of your certainty

I have no doubt about that

Then do it! instead of just running off at the mouth like some punk.

You are a coward when it comes to discussing race relations. Dare to bring up a legitimate issue and you go from zero to troll in the blink of an eye

tomcat says "Anytime baby".






(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 11:50:17 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Gauge


ORIGINAL: thompsonx




No, it is what is common practice for police officers.
It is what they refer to as an Extra Job.

Is that why they have to have special permission in writting to have this extra job?


It is completely allowed for them to participate in working for a private security company or local establishment as security. They are not officially working for their department but are still allowed to make arrests and yes, even enforce the law if need be.

Since cops are cops 24/7 they are wearing their cop uniform and using their cop authority and their cop gun and badge while working for a second paycheck. Not all jurrisdictions allow this.



Perfectly above board, legal, common knowledge amongst the civilians and not unethical.

In my country cops are civilians by law.

Before commenting on something, please try to understand what it is you are commenting on.

You clearly need to follow your own advice.




Look Sunshine, I will definitely keep quiet when I don't know something.

Now sweetie you know you have this genetic thingie that prevents you from doing that...but it is cute that you try


Oddly enough, you didn't prove me wrong, you simply gave more details about what the practice is all about.

I pointed out that you were wrong about cops not being civilians.

I know you like to believe you are right all the time,

Being right is not a matter of belief. Being right is knowing what you are talking about before you hit enter.



but this time you supported my point, not ripped it apart.

This time, as in everytime I have disagreed with you, I have shown the inaccuracies of your opinions. Ripping is reserved for scenes involving "ravishment"




(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 12:01:37 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

You haven't actually written anything, you have slobbered, and spouted geysers of the most imbecilic doggerel here, but havent had a thought that would occupy the level of even a dung beetle.

I am not an etymyologist but I play one on t.v. and I wont have you denigrating one of our more usefull exoskeletal creatures.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 12:03:49 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Hilarious to the trolls, perhaps, that MLK's dream of having people judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin falls on deaf ears in St Lois today

Just because the young man who died after taking several shots at an off duty cop was black is reason to riot?

Perhaps he was listening to another famous amerikan..."give me liberty or give me death"

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 12:05:45 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Sanity


How about we get back on topic, professor

Why is it that the knee-jerk rioters in the St Lois area have never heard, or at least taken to heart, the dream spoken of by MLK

Are you speaking of the white rioters? Have you any proof of this scuroulous lie? Or is this some more of the shit that gushes from your mouth with every post?

While most of the rest of us have a very long time ago

Like the white cop that executed the kid in fergustan?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 12:49:43 PM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Now sweetie you know you have this genetic thingie that prevents you from doing that...but it is cute that you try



It is cute, isn't it? It is even more cute that I do shut my mouth when I don't know something... unlike you, where your need to insult people takes over your ability to think rationally. Kind of like your claim that the article said nothing about the cop being the only one with the gun. I proved you wrong, and you came back with asking if we expect you to believe there was a gun by the cops say so? Well, yes, that was what was in the article, and we were going off of the article, and there has been nothing to say that he did not have a gun.

quote:

I pointed out that you were wrong about cops not being civilians.


Where did I say that cops were not civilians? They are civilians that are empowered by their jurisdiction to enforce the law. This makes them a little different than average civilians.

quote:

Being right is not a matter of belief. Being right is knowing what you are talking about before you hit enter.


You have yet to prove me wrong. I don't really care if you think I am. The facts speak for themselves.

quote:

This time, as in everytime I have disagreed with you, I have shown the inaccuracies of your opinions. Ripping is reserved for scenes involving "ravishment"


Now I am going to have to show you the inaccuracies of your statement. An opinion cannot be wrong or right, it is an opinion. Facts however can be wrong or right depending on many factors. An opinion based on correct factual information is more difficult to prove inaccurate than an opinion based on false information. My experience with you is that you simply don't bother to interact and discuss, but you swoop in and try to prove how superior you are to everyone else. That is fine, but for myself, you are just like me, a person with an opinion. I really don't know why I bother with you, you are always the same every single time I have attempted to discuss something with you. I don't have a burning need to be right all the time, and I will be the first one to admit I was wrong about something, so, I will let you know when that happens on my own.

I anxiously await your reply that will insist that I am wrong... yet again.

_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 1:01:30 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Gauge


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Now sweetie you know you have this genetic thingie that prevents you from doing that...but it is cute that you try



It is cute, isn't it?

I said it was, didn't I?

I anxiously await your reply that will insist that I am wrong... yet again.

Wrong again I just said you were right.









(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 1:23:26 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Gauge

It is even more cute that I do shut my mouth when I don't know something...

ROFLMFAO cite please.


unlike you,

Where have I been wrong?



where your need to insult people takes over your ability to think rationally.

I have not been insulting to you have I?I have pointed out a few errors in logic and failure to be aware of certain facts.


Kind of like your claim that the article said nothing about the cop being the only one with the gun. I proved you wrong, and you came back with asking if we expect you to believe there was a gun by the cops say so?

As was shown in the other thread about cops executing people for being black in public. What ever the cops say is an allegation until proved otherwise.



Well, yes, that was what was in the article, and we were going off of the article, and there has been nothing to say that he did not have a gun.

Just as the cites reffed in the other thread said the dead man was shot while attacking the murderer.

I pointed out that you were wrong about cops not being civilians.

Where did I say that cops were not civilians? They are civilians that are empowered by their jurisdiction to enforce the law. This makes them a little different than average civilians.

Go read what you wrote and take your foot out of your mouth. You claimed that cops

"Perfectly above board, legal, common knowledge amongst the civilians and not unethical."

Stating that this knowledge (that all cops have) is common among those not cops as in civilians. Now if the grammar of that escapes you perhaps a phone call to your 7th grade english teacher could disabuse you of your ignorance?


Being right is not a matter of belief. Being right is knowing what you are talking about before you hit enter.

You have yet to prove me wrong. I don't really care if you think I am. The facts speak for themselves.

This time, as in everytime I have disagreed with you, I have shown the inaccuracies of your opinions. Ripping is reserved for scenes involving "ravishment"

Now I am going to have to show you the inaccuracies of your statement. An opinion cannot be wrong or right, it is an opinion.




Facts however can be wrong or right depending on many factors.

Wanna try that one again



An opinion based on correct factual information is more difficult to prove inaccurate than an opinion based on false information. My experience with you is that you simply don't bother to interact and discuss, but you swoop in and try to prove how superior you are to everyone else.

Not superior just better informed...facts trumph opinion everytime.




That is fine, but for myself, you are just like me, a person with an opinion.

When I state an opinion it is labled as such. When I state a fact I also label it as such.

I really don't know why I bother with you,

Because you think that knowledgable is hawt...why the phoque else would you put up with me?


you are always the same every single time I have attempted to discuss something with you.

That is what happens when you come to class without having done your homework.


I don't have a burning need to be right all the time,

If you don't then you must have a burning desire to be wrong all the time....tell me it ain't so


and I will be the first one to admit I was wrong about something, so, I will let you know when that happens on my own.

refer to the bolded parts in my previous post.



< Message edited by thompsonx -- 10/10/2014 1:27:57 PM >

(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 2:10:20 PM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

blah, blah blah blah





Whatever dude. Rock on.

_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 2:34:24 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Gauge


ORIGINAL: thompsonx

blah, blah blah blah



Whatever dude. Rock on.

See how easy that was


(in reply to Gauge)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Content of Character: 0 - 10/10/2014 3:48:21 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83
The problem is not for him acting or having the power to when off duty, it is for him accepting two paychecks one to protect public interests the other one to pursuit a private interest while acting as public officer, that's borderline to birbery.


Private interests? It's usually some security related role they are being hired for. You know, pretty much exactly like what their day job is? It's not like they are a military wing of some private firm. Think of them like bouncers at a night club. They are there to keep the peace at the night club.

There was a bar in Toledo that had a rash of shootings. They hired some off-duty police to be the salve to the rash. Worked quite well, too.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to eulero83)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Content of Character: 0 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109