RE: The President did call their bluff!

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: The President did call their bluff!

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The President did call their bluff!

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: The President did call their bluff! - 10/29/2014 3:00:30 PM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

I vaguely remember some talk about it but to be honest

So "to be honest" you would not have posted anything about it since it is such a vague memory?

Nope I would have posted exactly what I did and not claim to remember details.

Posting in ignorance seems to be pretty common with you.

I didn't pay it any more attention than I have with all the past presidents.

Yet from this self confessed ignorance you continue to litter the board with your insipid opinions.

And you continue to litter the board with your childish insults.

Nothing childish about my lexicon or my diction.

Now I remember why I had you on hide. Buh bye.

Yeah right, just like the rest of the morons who cannot defend their moronic positions claim to have me on hide.

(in reply to thishereboi)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: The President did call their bluff! - 10/29/2014 3:59:52 PM

joether

Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Recall four months ago how the Republicans were going to sue the President of the United States of America? Because he was....ACTUALLY....doing his job (unlike all of the Republicans in Congress). That the law suit was put into play to garner political points from the Republican/Tea Party base in the upcoming election in a week or so. How far is it from Congress to the Federal Courthouse, were this lawsuit would be filed?
About a 10 minutes walk.
What's the hold up Republicans? Cant walk for 10 minutes? Don't have a working car? Never heard of a bicycle? Can't afford a cab or courier, but can afford multi-million dollar re-election campaigns?
No, the reasons are many. The more popular ones are (in no particular order):
A ) The President called their bluff because they have...NOTHING...on him.
B ) When was the last time we accused the Republican/Tea Party of accomplishing things in the last six years?
C ) Those Republican/Tea Party folks running for re-election didn't want the Democratic base to be...HIGHLY...motivated to vote.
D ) The Republican 'nobility' is afraid to be seen in public, among the peasants they rule over.
Yeah, option 'C' is the most likely of the group. Which shows just how 'tough' Republicans are on the 'issues that matter to their base'. If they cant be 'tough' with the President, why should anyone think they will be tough on any other issue facing the nation?

Where did the President "call their bluff?" The article has no mention of it.

While the subject of the lawsuit may or may not have merit, anyone who didn't truly think this was more political than anything needs to catch up with the rest of us.

Its assuming you have been following events related to this article. And I know you have been. So posting something the President did four months ago, that is freely available didnt seem needed to post...once more! Mr. Speaker made a threat and realized Democrats would benefit more from it then the Republican/Tea Party. So the matter was 'dropped'. Which means two possible events will take place:

A ) The matter really has dropped. The lawsuit will slip into American Political History as a weird anomaly (like Ross Perot).

B ) The Republicans will restart the lawsuit...AFTER...the election, to show just how dickless they have become. Feeling its 'safe' to 'come out of the closet' and attack the President over even more petty political shit.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: The President did call their bluff! - 10/29/2014 4:21:44 PM

MrRodgers

Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

.....or maybe they dropped it because almost every lawyer they consulted probably said the suit would be...thrown out of court.

Given the fact that the constitution does not empower the congress to sue the president, they either send impeachment articles to the senate or shut up and get back to bitch'n about Obamacare, immigrants and over regulation.

(in reply to joether)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: The President did call their bluff! - 10/29/2014 10:01:53 PM

joether

Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
.....or maybe they dropped it because almost every lawyer they consulted probably said the suit would be...thrown out of court.

Given the fact that the constitution does not empower the congress to sue the president, they either send impeachment articles to the senate or shut up and get back to bitch'n about Obamacare, immigrants and over regulation.

They couldn't impeach him, hence why they tried to sue. In order to impeach they would need a REAL argument. Lets consult history of US Presidents and impeachable issues:

A ) A Democrat whom got a blowjob from a White House Intern and the affair that goes with it. This person lies about it.

B ) A Republican whom lies to get the nation into two wars over 'WMDs' in 'Large stockpiles'. When we get there, there are no WMDs in the amounts this President stated.

Which President got impeached by the Republicans? The Democrat of course. How much credibility do Republicans have when it comes to impeaching someone over doing the wrong things? None!

In the Republican's mind.....anything that undermines the President is a good thing. Even if that means the whole nation should got to hell. Does that sound like the kind of people to have in elected office?

(in reply to MrRodgers)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: The President did call their bluff! - 10/29/2014 10:40:36 PM

MrRodgers

Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
.....or maybe they dropped it because almost every lawyer they consulted probably said the suit would be...thrown out of court.

Given the fact that the constitution does not empower the congress to sue the president, they either send impeachment articles to the senate or shut up and get back to bitch'n about Obamacare, immigrants and over regulation.

They couldn't impeach him, hence why they tried to sue. In order to impeach they would need a REAL argument. Lets consult history of US Presidents and impeachable issues:

A ) A Democrat whom got a blowjob from a White House Intern and the affair that goes with it. This person lies about it.

B ) A Republican whom lies to get the nation into two wars over 'WMDs' in 'Large stockpiles'. When we get there, there are no WMDs in the amounts this President stated.

Which President got impeached by the Republicans? The Democrat of course. How much credibility do Republicans have when it comes to impeaching someone over doing the wrong things? None!

In the Republican's mind.....anything that undermines the President is a good thing. Even if that means the whole nation should got to hell. Does that sound like the kind of people to have in elected office?

Oh you are as they say...preaching to the choir. I am and have been a conservative but the republican party might just as well now be called the 'Capitalist' party of God and all Things (people) angry and White' and has basically gone of the deep end.

Conservatives in America are leaving the repub party. They being such a small number...makes little electoral difference.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 10/29/2014 10:48:44 PM >

(in reply to joether)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: The President did call their bluff! - 10/30/2014 3:03:56 AM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Where did the President "call their bluff?" The article has no mention of it.
While the subject of the lawsuit may or may not have merit, anyone who didn't truly think this was more political than anything needs to catch up with the rest of us.

Its assuming you have been following events related to this article. And I know you have been. So posting something the President did four months ago, that is freely available didnt seem needed to post...once more! Mr. Speaker made a threat and realized Democrats would benefit more from it then the Republican/Tea Party. So the matter was 'dropped'. Which means two possible events will take place:
A ) The matter really has dropped. The lawsuit will slip into American Political History as a weird anomaly (like Ross Perot).
B ) The Republicans will restart the lawsuit...AFTER...the election, to show just how dickless they have become. Feeling its 'safe' to 'come out of the closet' and attack the President over even more petty political shit.

2 things:

1. Lucy posted a link to the President calling Beohner's bluff, I acknowledged I had forgotten about it, and thanked Lucy for posting the link. I guess you must not read all the posts on here. I do understand. This is such a long thread to folllow.

2. The matter hasn't dropped. It was a political ploy to start with. It's going to be a political ploy if it's ever brought up again. Did you really not know it wasn't anything but politics? Why is it so odd a thing to you that it might come back up when the GOP thinks they might need the leverage? These elections are being predicted to go to the GOP winning the Senate back, and increasing their majority in the House. They don't feel they need more ploys to improve their take. Is this really a foreign concept for you?

_____________________________

What I support: