Extravagasm
Posts: 230
Joined: 9/22/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
MasterDoc1: There ARE other political parties. As noted, it's just that the media doesn't want you to think of them. I've voted for president 10 times (just added it up) and haven't voted for a Republican or a Democrat ONCE. And in the most recent election I had the happy privilege of voting for the best presidential candidate I've seen in my lifetime. And 1,275,922 other Americans voted the same way. Well said and absolutely correct. That candidate also phrased it, that the US shouldn't have tangled in Iraq. Not: that the Republicans or Democrats shouldn't. When Central Americans look back at the Spanish tyrants who mutilated them, they think Spain, not a particular Spanish dynasty. When the Native Americans look back at being ethnic cleansed, they don't name political parties. When Africans were dragged across the middle passages, they don't look back at politics. Hawaiians don't muse which party sent the US Marines to overpower their Queen. When US assassinated Iran's 1940s President to install the tyrannical Oil Shah, Iranians don't fuss whether Ike was Republican or Teddy Roosevelt's grandson was Democrat or his clandestine operation was party-neutral. The Japanese don't think just Truman Democrats approved atomic weapons of mass destruction on whole civilian populations. They think, US people do. Even the rare case of VietNamese, curiously seem to have forgiven us for overrunning them; they don't just forgive Ike and Kennedy, they forgive all the US. Party bickering about who historically started what, is the way Americans shirk off responsibility for colossal US deeds and misdeeds. That is the way I put it. Here the way Osama bin Ladin put it: In the US, dropping the Atomic bomb on civilians is not called a shameful travesty. Americans call it a debatable issue. (Most of us are in denial of this observation.) Like Woodrow Wilson's allowance for Turkey killing Armenian civilians by the boxcar, not being genocide. (A template, pointed to and followed by Hitler.) You can be sure those who came after bin Ladin are now making the same argument about torture not being called shameful travesty by Americans anymore, just a debatable issue. POINT IS if you want to improve the US, we have to improve standing US policy. Not improve the political parties. Because they each follow it. Especially improve standing US policy on clandestine interventions. Perhaps most interventions. It is the policy tolerances of US citizens that permits status quo. This means getting as fired up about standing US policy, as we now do, about meaningless Presidential elections. This is the part where people disinterested in improvement, will clamor "Show me a better country". Give me a break. For almost a half a century the US National Security Estimate has included Strategic Oil Resources, as an act of war issue. Saddam was eliminated because he was no longer committed to trading oil in US dollars. US is one of very few countries whose military is authorized to make unprovoked First-Strike Nuclear attacks. US is one of only two nations refusing to sign international treaties against land mines. Is this the way longstanding US policy always has to be?
< Message edited by Extravagasm -- 10/29/2014 12:23:21 AM >
_____________________________
BDSM operates on submission. Not on love, fairness, or convention. The way to a Dom . . is to follow his karma, wallow in his grime, Swim in his heart.© Yeah, fantasy is not reality. That's how it gives direction to the truly gifted.
|