|
Arturas -> RE: Republicans quietly admit Bemghazi was not a conspiracy! (1/2/2015 9:20:19 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity
Full troll mode = every other word is the word "you"
Now the very act of addressing you is "full troll mode"? You are a strange one indeed.
It's the second person pronoun, used when talking to another person. See, that's what a discussion is.
you
yo͞o,yə/
pronoun
pronoun: you
1.
used to refer to the person or people that the speaker is addressing.
"are you listening?"
used to refer to the person being addressed together with other people regarded in the same class.
"you Australians"
used in exclamations to address one or more people.
"you fools"
2.
used to refer to any person in general.
"after a while, you get used to it"
Origin
Old English ēow, accusative and dative of gē (see ye1); related to Dutch u and German euch . During the 14th century you began to replace ye1, thou1, and thee; by the 17th century it had become the ordinary second person pronoun for any number and case.
Translate you to
Use over time for: you
dis·cus·sion
dəˈskəSH(ə)n/
noun
noun: discussion
the action or process of talking about something, typically in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas.
"the proposals are not a blueprint but ideas for discussion"
* a conversation or debate about a certain topic.
plural noun: discussions
"discussions about environmental improvement programs"
synonyms: conversation, talk, dialogue, discourse, conference, debate, exchange of views, consultation, deliberation; More
powwow, chat, tête-à-tête, heart-to-heart, huddle;
negotiations, parley;
informalconfab, chitchat, rap (session), skull session, bull session;
formalconfabulation, colloquy
"a long discussion with her husband"
* a detailed treatment of a particular topic in speech or writing.
synonyms: examination, exploration, analysis, study; More
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Really. What Congressional investigations were those?
Instead . . . here's what ACTUALLY happened -- your favorite "leftist" protected Bush:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/31/obama-justice-department-immunity-bush-cia-torturer
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/us/politics/12inquire.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
http://jonathanturley.org/2010/12/02/wikileaks-obama-administration-secretly-worked-to-prevent-prosecution-of-war-crimes-by-the-bush-administration/
Did I write "congressional investigation"
No
I was referring primarily to the massive propaganda efforts
Re your point about Barack and other leftists... As if anything happens in a vacuum
These leftists didnt want the fact that every Democrat on the hill (going back beyond Bill Clinton) backed the liberation effort and was fully aware of all the available intelligence prior to the invasion spilled all over the place
They knew their propaganda would be ruined by the truth
Well since the topic is a chant of Congressional Republicans, I thought you'd like to stay on topic. I know how you get when people try to deflect the topic. [8|]
There's a reason he's Bush Lite. When it suits your purpose, they're all the same. When it conflicts with your parroted talking points, they're different in your mind.
It's hard to have discussions with you since you cling so hard to falsity. It's no "secret" that "every Democrat on the hill" supported the invasion (it's hardly been a "liberation"). They did vote, you know, as a matter of public record.
[8|]
# of words you ignored instead of addressing: 114
# of words you saw: 7
When it's not about you, nothing registers.
What an ego. But the rest of us are discussing reality.
Over on Gor. LOL.
|
|
|
|
