FieryOpal -> RE: Sex with submissives (12/21/2014 5:29:30 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MissPeach09 Haha FieryOpal I feel the same way. As I get older I don't feel the need to keep men around who can't satisfy in every category. Yes that massage might be amazing, but if I don't enjoy the sex I have to say no because sex is just important to me honestly. That's my kind of gal. [sm=kiss.gif] Again, strictly speaking from an F/m viewpoint, the presumptuousness of this man to think he should become your primary partner and line-jump. I'm mono and ideally my primary would be my pairbonded mate, but there are no shortcuts with me to winning my heart or having any other kind of access to me. I would be the one collaring him, not the other way around. This is really unheard of in a non-marital situation. quote:
ORIGINAL: MissPeach09 ...he's a "professional" apparently and I'm a lifestyler.... WHAT A CREEP! So glad that I turned him down and did NOT end up meeting this clown. A professional what? A professional clown, more like (no offense to those who actually are). For his info, being a lifestyler is not a derogatory term. I think he meant (BDSM) kinkster, and this isn't an insult to them either. You can tell a person's character by how well they take rejection, when he no longer feels he has anything to lose and then his nastiness, belligerence and/or spitefulness surfaces. It really is a good test, if I were the covertly testing type, which I am not. Nobody can say they were/are not forewarned with me.
|
|
|
|