quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Gotta watch your mouth...
http://www.texasgopvote.com/issues/restore-families/justice-james-black-cop-shoots-unarmed-white-veteran-orange-tx-over-racial-slur-0057061

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity




Obfuscation and mindless bullshit

The Daily Banter is all far left propaganda all the time

How about

http://abcnews.go.com/US/indiana-cops-tasered-man-accused-excessive-force-past/story?id=26051579

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/09/justice/indiana-excessive-force-lawsuit/

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/08/us/indiana-police-taser-window-smash/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2783809/Terrifying-moment-police-smashed-car-window-tasered-passenger-routine-traffic-stop-Indiana.html


Regarding your philly.com article... That, in a nation of 300 million people you found one article in a semi-respectable website about a drunk white guy who wasnt killed by the police when waving a gun around... Proves what, exactly.
How about it was the latest shooting I found while wandering the web...simple enough for you, it was a link I followed from another, however you cant prove its true, and Ive already mentioned Eric Frien, Jared Miller, and Cliven bundys cohorts, you mean you DONT want something more relevant or recent? well what do ya know ... even tho there were TWO separate incidences at the same bar
HAH




Only that you are as obsessed with hating and blaming 'the white devil' for Michael Brown committing suicide-by-cop as certain "community organizers" and certain wild-eyed preacher men are

No I hate disgusting malicious minded white men and women who dont see what the problem is

Sure, great idea... Incite rioting. Watch as mobs destroy small businesses, peoples' dreams and livelihoods, incite murder over literally nothing
DONT TREAD ON ME and WATER THE TREE OF LIBERTY WITH BLOOD and "dont retreat, reload" is so peaceful, rational and calm...oh and so so loving

Great idea, as long as you dont have to live here, you live in Canada or England or wherever
Of course there is a reason I dont live in the US. its guns and the shitty healthcare system.

The reality is, its you who hate black people enough that you laugh as they are taught these insane, racist lies
when your insane racist lies are in fact the truth, I dont laugh at all, only at you.

White people are hunting them down

Fucking lies and hateful, irresponsible politically motivated propaganda.
Your posts are full of them....

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


FYI: I've never ever seen Sanity admit he was wrong about anything.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Carameldomme




"Nobody said this was the first one. But it is the current one."
Well, the original post implies that it's singular. " Imagine if the Tea Party, a deranged Tea Party member did something of the sort..."

mention that the one in Las Vegas was used as an excuse to attack all gun owners.
"So saying that people who pretend that cops are conducting a war against blacks and those who chant death to cops bear some responsibility are not out of line"
Two separate sets of people. 1- I take exception to your use "pretend." There is. If you'd lucky enough to be ignorant of this, enjoy your blinders.
Perhaps those who made that chant do bear responsibility. If they asked for it,I would think they'd revel in their success at this time. However, as I clearly pointed out,, my issue is that 50,000 people are being coloured by the words of an unrelated 100. That coloring is extended to a person who DID NOT organize either of these marches, just because people want to blame him.


I do NOT know that Sharpton did either of those things, but I don't take issue with either. Why should tragedy pause this movement? That's like saying people who work against GMOS should stop their work because a hippie killed mr.monsanto. To say this movement should pause is to implicate the movement in these men's deaths, and for anyone who is involved the movement to do so is almost an admission of culpability. I state EMPHATICALLY that this movement is NOT responsible for those murders. It's certainly less responsible for those murders than the entire police/justice conglomerate is for the murders of myriad unarmed Black men, but when do you see those entities pausing their work? Do you question why they don't?


"You do know don't you that Sharpton referred to this as a revolution in his dismissal of the NYC mayor's request not to have demonstrations today when Ramos's funeral was to be held?"

Of course some take offense to the word pretend. I take offense to the charge that it is taking place.
Once you convince 15 % of the population that the cops are out to kill them you have to be a fool to not expect a tragedy like this. Sharpton didn't have to be in town to have set the wheels in motion. When this happened he was in DC, close to where the shooter came up from, that day.
As you can see Cloudboy is trying to blame gun owners for this.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Carameldomme




"Nobody said this was the first one. But it is the current one."
Well, the original post implies that it's singular. " Imagine if the Tea Party, a deranged Tea Party member did something of the sort..."

mention that the one in Las Vegas was used as an excuse to attack all gun owners.
"So saying that people who pretend that cops are conducting a war against blacks and those who chant death to cops bear some responsibility are not out of line"
Two separate sets of people. 1- I take exception to your use "pretend." There is. If you'd lucky enough to be ignorant of this, enjoy your blinders.
Perhaps those who made that chant do bear responsibility. If they asked for it,I would think they'd revel in their success at this time. However, as I clearly pointed out,, my issue is that 50,000 people are being coloured by the words of an unrelated 100. That coloring is extended to a person who DID NOT organize either of these marches, just because people want to blame him.


I do NOT know that Sharpton did either of those things, but I don't take issue with either. Why should tragedy pause this movement? That's like saying people who work against GMOS should stop their work because a hippie killed mr.monsanto. To say this movement should pause is to implicate the movement in these men's deaths, and for anyone who is involved the movement to do so is almost an admission of culpability. I state EMPHATICALLY that this movement is NOT responsible for those murders. It's certainly less responsible for those murders than the entire police/justice conglomerate is for the murders of myriad unarmed Black men, but when do you see those entities pausing their work? Do you question why they don't?


"You do know don't you that Sharpton referred to this as a revolution in his dismissal of the NYC mayor's request not to have demonstrations today when Ramos's funeral was to be held?"

Of course some take offense to the word pretend. I take offense to the charge that it is taking place.
Once you convince 15 % of the population that the cops are out to kill them you have to be a fool to not expect a tragedy like this. Sharpton didn't have to be in town to have set the wheels in motion. When this happened he was in DC, close to where the shooter came up from, that day.
As you can see Cloudboy is trying to blame gun owners for this.

Well it was in fact a gun "owner" who did the shooting,was it not ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Carameldomme




"Nobody said this was the first one. But it is the current one."
Well, the original post implies that it's singular. " Imagine if the Tea Party, a deranged Tea Party member did something of the sort..."

mention that the one in Las Vegas was used as an excuse to attack all gun owners.
"So saying that people who pretend that cops are conducting a war against blacks and those who chant death to cops bear some responsibility are not out of line"
Two separate sets of people. 1- I take exception to your use "pretend." There is. If you'd lucky enough to be ignorant of this, enjoy your blinders.
Perhaps those who made that chant do bear responsibility. If they asked for it,I would think they'd revel in their success at this time. However, as I clearly pointed out,, my issue is that 50,000 people are being coloured by the words of an unrelated 100. That coloring is extended to a person who DID NOT organize either of these marches, just because people want to blame him.


I do NOT know that Sharpton did either of those things, but I don't take issue with either. Why should tragedy pause this movement? That's like saying people who work against GMOS should stop their work because a hippie killed mr.monsanto. To say this movement should pause is to implicate the movement in these men's deaths, and for anyone who is involved the movement to do so is almost an admission of culpability. I state EMPHATICALLY that this movement is NOT responsible for those murders. It's certainly less responsible for those murders than the entire police/justice conglomerate is for the murders of myriad unarmed Black men, but when do you see those entities pausing their work? Do you question why they don't?


"You do know don't you that Sharpton referred to this as a revolution in his dismissal of the NYC mayor's request not to have demonstrations today when Ramos's funeral was to be held?"

Of course some take offense to the word pretend. I take offense to the charge that it is taking place.
Once you convince 15 % of the population that the cops are out to kill them you have to be a fool to not expect a tragedy like this. Sharpton didn't have to be in town to have set the wheels in motion. When this happened he was in DC, close to where the shooter came up from, that day.
As you can see Cloudboy is trying to blame gun owners for this.

Well it was in fact a gun "owner" who did the shooting,was it not ?

It is also a fact that a black man did the shooting, so should we blame all black men?
I know this will go over your's and CB's anti gun minds but there is a difference between a gun owner and a gun possessor.
He clearly had no respect for the law, it was illegal for him to even carry in NYC, and he had already shot his gf. I would suspect that he obtained the firearm illegally.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Gotta watch your mouth...
http://www.texasgopvote.com/issues/restore-families/justice-james-black-cop-shoots-unarmed-white-veteran-orange-tx-over-racial-slur-0057061

So in your opinion, a black cop, cleared by a Grand Jury, is still guilty ? Gotta watch your source.

http://www.texasobserver.org/james-whitehead-robert-arnold-shades-gray-orange/

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Gotta watch your mouth...
http://www.texasgopvote.com/issues/restore-families/justice-james-black-cop-shoots-unarmed-white-veteran-orange-tx-over-racial-slur-0057061

So in your opinion, a black cop, cleared by a Grand Jury, is still guilty ? Gotta watch your source.

http://www.texasobserver.org/james-whitehead-robert-arnold-shades-gray-orange/

White cops cleared by grand juries are still guilty. Color of skin should not matter, right?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


FYI: I've never ever seen Sanity admit he was wrong about anything.

See, you do have something in common with him.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Carameldomme




"Nobody said this was the first one. But it is the current one."
Well, the original post implies that it's singular. " Imagine if the Tea Party, a deranged Tea Party member did something of the sort..."

mention that the one in Las Vegas was used as an excuse to attack all gun owners.
"So saying that people who pretend that cops are conducting a war against blacks and those who chant death to cops bear some responsibility are not out of line"
Two separate sets of people. 1- I take exception to your use "pretend." There is. If you'd lucky enough to be ignorant of this, enjoy your blinders.
Perhaps those who made that chant do bear responsibility. If they asked for it,I would think they'd revel in their success at this time. However, as I clearly pointed out,, my issue is that 50,000 people are being coloured by the words of an unrelated 100. That coloring is extended to a person who DID NOT organize either of these marches, just because people want to blame him.


I do NOT know that Sharpton did either of those things, but I don't take issue with either. Why should tragedy pause this movement? That's like saying people who work against GMOS should stop their work because a hippie killed mr.monsanto. To say this movement should pause is to implicate the movement in these men's deaths, and for anyone who is involved the movement to do so is almost an admission of culpability. I state EMPHATICALLY that this movement is NOT responsible for those murders. It's certainly less responsible for those murders than the entire police/justice conglomerate is for the murders of myriad unarmed Black men, but when do you see those entities pausing their work? Do you question why they don't?


"You do know don't you that Sharpton referred to this as a revolution in his dismissal of the NYC mayor's request not to have demonstrations today when Ramos's funeral was to be held?"

Of course some take offense to the word pretend. I take offense to the charge that it is taking place.
Once you convince 15 % of the population that the cops are out to kill them you have to be a fool to not expect a tragedy like this. Sharpton didn't have to be in town to have set the wheels in motion. When this happened he was in DC, close to where the shooter came up from, that day.
As you can see Cloudboy is trying to blame gun owners for this.

Well it was in fact a gun "owner" who did the shooting,was it not ?

It is also a fact that a black man did the shooting, so should we blame all black men?
I know this will go over your's and CB's anti gun minds but there is a difference between a gun owner and a gun possessor.
He clearly had no respect for the law, it was illegal for him to even carry in NYC, and he had already shot his gf. I would suspect that he obtained the firearm illegally.

Dont get your panties in a wad....I was just pointing out the obvious.
You seem to be a little touchy about that though.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Gotta watch your mouth...
http://www.texasgopvote.com/issues/restore-families/justice-james-black-cop-shoots-unarmed-white-veteran-orange-tx-over-racial-slur-0057061

So in your opinion, a black cop, cleared by a Grand Jury, is still guilty ? Gotta watch your source.

http://www.texasobserver.org/james-whitehead-robert-arnold-shades-gray-orange/

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

~FR~

This either/or what-you're-saying baloney is so pointless.

First, it's automatically a straw man, because there isn't anyone so polarized and simplistic as the resulting caricature.

Second, because it's not actually addressing any actually held positions, it's literally pointless -- it's not refuting anything except mental projections.

And Third, pointing out an injustice does not mean something therefore is against everyone of similar circumstances. That's just made up silliness.

Realistically --

No one here supports killing cops. Deal with it.
No one here supports calling for dead cops. Deal with it.
No one here thinks all cops are evil. In fact, most are great.
(fyiw, I have friends and friends of friends who are state troopers)
Everyone here is against cop killing. Everyone gets they have a tough, dangerous job already.

What people ARE against is the incidences of police brutality, especially those ending in death. Those incidences exist. They shouldn't. And even cops oppose that--imagine.

What's in question is whether justice was served in the recent cases. Was it? Personally, I don't know--I wasn't there...though it is clear the prosecution made a mess of the case. Deliberately? That's a strong accusation I'm not prepared to stand on. It is a curious fuck up, however, and I understand the suspicions (and I'm not usually on the conspiracy side) even if I'm not prepared to try to make a case for them.

Is racism in play in these cases? I don't know that either.

At the same time, to deny that racism is very much alive in this country is just to willfully deny reality.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

~FR~

This either/or what-you're-saying baloney is so pointless.

First, it's automatically a straw man, because there isn't anyone so polarized and simplistic as the resulting caricature.

Second, because it's not actually addressing any actually held positions, it's literally pointless -- it's not refuting anything except mental projections.

And Third, pointing out an injustice does not mean something therefore is against everyone of similar circumstances. That's just made up silliness.

Realistically --

No one here supports killing cops. Deal with it.
No one here supports calling for dead cops. Deal with it.
No one here thinks all cops are evil. In fact, most are great.
(fyiw, I have friends and friends of friends who are state troopers)
Everyone here is against cop killing. Everyone gets they have a tough, dangerous job already.

What people ARE against is the incidences of police brutality, especially those ending in death. Those incidences exist. They shouldn't. And even cops oppose that--imagine.

What's in question is whether justice was served in the recent cases. Was it? Personally, I don't know--I wasn't there...though it is clear the prosecution made a mess of the case. Deliberately? That's a strong accusation I'm not prepared to stand on. It is a curious fuck up, however, and I understand the suspicions (and I'm not usually on the conspiracy side) even if I'm not prepared to try to make a case for them.

Is racism in play in these cases? I don't know that either.

At the same time, to deny that racism is very much alive in this country is just to willfully deny reality.

Bests comment of the thread

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

~FR~

This either/or what-you're-saying baloney is so pointless.

First, it's automatically a straw man, because there isn't anyone so polarized and simplistic as the resulting caricature.

Second, because it's not actually addressing any actually held positions, it's literally pointless -- it's not refuting anything except mental projections.

And Third, pointing out an injustice does not mean something therefore is against everyone of similar circumstances. That's just made up silliness.

Realistically --

No one here supports killing cops. Deal with it.
No one here supports calling for dead cops. Deal with it.
No one here thinks all cops are evil. In fact, most are great.
(fyiw, I have friends and friends of friends who are state troopers)
Everyone here is against cop killing. Everyone gets they have a tough, dangerous job already.

What people ARE against is the incidences of police brutality, especially those ending in death. Those incidences exist. They shouldn't. And even cops oppose that--imagine.

What's in question is whether justice was served in the recent cases. Was it? Personally, I don't know--I wasn't there...though it is clear the prosecution made a mess of the case. Deliberately? That's a strong accusation I'm not prepared to stand on. It is a curious fuck up, however, and I understand the suspicions (and I'm not usually on the conspiracy side) even if I'm not prepared to try to make a case for them.

Is racism in play in these cases? I don't know that either.

At the same time, to deny that racism is very much alive in this country is just to willfully deny reality.

Bests comment of the thread

Of course it is...because it supports your views...skewed to the left.

quote:

No one here supports killing cops. Deal with it.
No one here supports calling for dead cops. Deal with it.
No one here thinks all cops are evil. In fact, most are great.
(fyiw, I have friends and friends of friends who are state troopers)
Everyone here is against cop killing. Everyone gets they have a tough, dangerous job already.