Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/markets/2014/12/23/djia-commerce-gdp-dow-stock/20803851/ THE BUSH YEARS ARE FINALLY BEHIND US!!!! (Mostly) A stock rally that sent major stock indexes to new heights on Tuesday was buoyed by more than just holiday spirits, according to the pros. Santa Claus came early this year by sending both the Dow Jones industrial average and the S&P 500 to new closing highs for a second consecutive day on Tuesday. The Dow closed up 0.4% to 18,024.17, following a previous closing high of 17,959.44 reached on Monday. The S&P 500, meanwhile, closed up 0.2% to 2082.17, above its closing high of 2078.54. Only the Nasdaq composite of tech stocks broke the mold, trading down 0.3% to close at 4765.42. While stock swings are easier to come by during a holiday week when volumes are light, economists said Tuesday's historic uptick is no Christmas miracle. "Sure, liquidity is low toward the end of the year, but the fundamental improvements in the economy support an upward trajectory for the stock market," said Brett Ryan, an economist with Deutsche Bank. "This is not valuation driven, this is not psychology driven — it's fundamentally driven," added David Darst, senior adviser to Morgan Stanley, of Tuesday's rally. neverminding that the "bush years" you are disparagingly referring to were largely a result of the housing bubble, which was overwhelmingly a liberal-caused phenomena. Wow. This crowd can argue about even good years. The housing bubble burst took until late 2014 to recover? Really? Why? Rationalization. And, the causes were complex (including the housing bubble), including especially the derivatives bundling and the lack of accounting to disclose their true risk, the resulting tight credit and uncertainty, and years of fiscal policy ignoring fundamentals (cutting revenue while increasing costs, including off-the-budget structural costs for two wars) while pushing monetary policy to near zero rates (further complicating both credit and the opportunity cost of holding funds, drying up liquidity), and the threat to shut down the government, causing US credit ratings to drop.
|