quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Mods??? We need a new fora for Sanity and his definition of rational discussion please?

PS Sanity Where do you stand on catholicism and the bible? And anglican church on the bible?
Im talking the bible that includes the old and new testament?
serious question and yes it does relate to the topic.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


No. Al-Sisi the Egyptian President.

quote:

"I am referring here to the religious clerics. … It's inconceivable that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire umma (Islamic world) to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing and destruction for the rest of the world. Impossible!

"That thinking — I am not saying 'religion' but 'thinking' — that corpus of texts and ideas that we have sacralized over the centuries, to the point that departing from them has become almost impossible, is antagonizing the entire world. It's antagonizing the entire world! ... All this that I am telling you, you cannot feel it if you remain trapped within this mindset. You need to step outside of yourselves to be able to observe it and reflect on it from a more enlightened perspective.

"I say and repeat again that we are in need of a religious revolution. You, imams, are responsible before Allah. The entire world, I say it again, the entire world is waiting for your next move … because this umma is being torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost — and it is being lost by our own hands."

He called for a religious revolution. And he is holding Muslims responsible for not calling out these horrific acts. And for the clerics encouraging them.

But around here as long as they are only killing and terrorizing Christians, Jews, and fire-worshipers, then that is okay. It is a peaceful religion.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Except the ones persecuting the French Jews, of course.

I mean, there IS a reason that Jews are fleeing France and all of Europe.

Fleeing? France has the third largest Jewish population, after the US and Israel.

Additionally, according to a 2005 poll made by the Pew Research Center, there is no evidence of any specific antisemitism in France, which, according to this poll, appears to be one of the least antisemitic countries in Europe,[58] though France has the world's third largest Jewish population.[1] France is the country that has the most favourable views of Jews in Europe (82%), next to the Netherlands, and the third country with the least unfavourable views (16%) next to the UK and the Netherlands.

Between 2000 and 2009, 13,315 French Jews moved to Israel, or made aliyah, an increase compared to the previous decade (1990–1999 : 10,443) that was in the continuity of a similar increase since the 1970s.[64] A peak was reached during this period, in 2005 (2005: 2,951 Olim) but a significant proportion (between 20 and 30%) eventually came back to France.

But that's out of 600,000 in the French Jewish community.

Ahh that is so cute.

In 2013 about 3,500 Jews left France.

In 2014 about 7,000 Jews left France.

They are estimating another 10k or this year will leave.

Cute that you stopped the years in review when the exodus started.

Cute or not, little girl, it doesn't change the points above.

Have you sent a telegram to the Prime Minister of France telling him that he is all wrong about the Jewish exodus from France and the dangers it poses. I am sure that he would find that re-assuring.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


No. Al-Sisi the Egyptian President.

quote:

"I am referring here to the religious clerics. … It's inconceivable that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire umma (Islamic world) to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing and destruction for the rest of the world. Impossible!

"That thinking — I am not saying 'religion' but 'thinking' — that corpus of texts and ideas that we have sacralized over the centuries, to the point that departing from them has become almost impossible, is antagonizing the entire world. It's antagonizing the entire world! ... All this that I am telling you, you cannot feel it if you remain trapped within this mindset. You need to step outside of yourselves to be able to observe it and reflect on it from a more enlightened perspective.

"I say and repeat again that we are in need of a religious revolution. You, imams, are responsible before Allah. The entire world, I say it again, the entire world is waiting for your next move … because this umma is being torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost — and it is being lost by our own hands."

He called for a religious revolution. And he is holding Muslims responsible for not calling out these horrific acts. And for the clerics encouraging them.

But around here as long as they are only killing and terrorizing Christians, Jews, and fire-worshipers, then that is okay. It is a peaceful religion.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Except the ones persecuting the French Jews, of course. They are what. . a percent or so of the population and receive 40% of "hate" crimes done by Muslims? (My numbers should be close if not exact.)

I mean, there IS a reason that Jews are fleeing France and all of Europe.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Only in your tiny brain bruv.

Let me get this straight. . .

As long as it is MUSLIMS selling women into slavery, stoning them, not allowing them civil rights, honor killing them, and so forth. . . it is hunky-dory in your world.

Ya know this does not surprise me. You have repeatedly shown that you do NOT consider women as equal humans.

After all, women should not be allowed to defend themselves. . .

Thousands of girls being raped and threatened is okay. . .

And let's see. .v. you are likely okay with the latest pedophilia stuff coming out of the UK.


I can see why you sympathize with Boko Haram and ISIS.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

when what is being shared/quoted is evident in multiple places, and is the contemporary norm, its not "cherry picking."

while im here---the constant use of "phobia" by liberals in reference to things conservatives disagree with, or reject, is an attempt to make it look as if those disagreements and rejections are based in irrational fear, like true phobias, and therefore should be eliminated. also those rejections, as the article in your link suggest, have nothing to do with hatred.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Only in your tiny brain bruv.

Let me get this straight. . .

As long as it is MUSLIMS selling women into slavery, stoning them, not allowing them civil rights, honor killing them, and so forth. . . it is hunky-dory in your world.

Ya know this does not surprise me. You have repeatedly shown that you do NOT consider women as equal humans.

After all, women should not be allowed to defend themselves. . .

Thousands of girls being raped and threatened is okay. . .

And let's see. .v. you are likely okay with the latest pedophilia stuff coming out of the UK.


I can see why you sympathize with Boko Haram and ISIS.

No, YOU have laid that at his feet. ONLY YOU are resonsible for your idiotic assumptions

He defended child rapists.

No, He absolutely did NOT not once.
YOU made an assumption that proved to be wrong, in more ways than one, and this isnt the first time you have made that claim,
he made an attempt to explain the word of grooming from the report to TheHeretic
then the shit hit the fan
He responded to you in post http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4726516

quote:

Dont put words in my mouth. I have never blamed anybody other than the perpertrators. You stupid remarks show you "Still" havent read the report.
I did say the girls were looking for love, some even claimed they loved the victim, that doesnt mean I think that makes it okay and saying it does only makes you look like a silly.

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4726767
The report section with the expression grooming in it, that several people swore blind wasnt there....

please note that the mod mentioned in post http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4727013

We have few rules in the Feisty sections, but I am currently seeing a need for one or two more. It has been a rare occurrence when I have found someone insinuating that someone was a ‘criminal’ or someone that encouraged, took part or enabled ‘criminals’ and ‘criminal activity’, but when I have, it has been removed from the forum. Now, creating a guideline for this could get tricky because many will ‘interpret’ anything we come up with from a personal standpoint that could get complicated or shall I say, nitpicky.

So, for the moment and especially on this thread, if you are tempted to accuse someone that is not personally involved in the thread ‘news’ or ‘situation’, of taking part, being a party to, allowing, encouraging or involved because of where they reside or any other 'factoid', you will face moderation. It is as simple as that. Complicate it and that would be on you, not moderators or staff, to interpret as you do or to explain further by way of arguing ‘points’.

If in any manner I believe you are insinuating that someone uninvolved in this ‘news’ is a party to or encouraging it, that is what staff will be working from.

Just don’t do it.

I may have to post this on every page until everyone gets it, but I am serious about this. Choose your words any way you must, to assure you aren’t insinuating that someone is a party to this in any manner.

Thank you for your compliance as we move forward.

And here you are doing it again.
why?

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


while im here---the constant use of "phobia" by liberals in reference to things conservatives disagree with, or reject, is an attempt to make it look as if those disagreements and rejections are based in irrational fear, like true phobias, and therefore should be eliminated. also those rejections, as the article in your link suggest, have nothing to do with hatred.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


while im here---the constant use of "phobia" by liberals in reference to things conservatives disagree with, or reject, is an attempt to make it look as if those disagreements and rejections are based in irrational fear, like true phobias, and therefore should be eliminated. also those rejections, as the article in your link suggest, have nothing to do with hatred.

What "constant use"?

You mean xenophobia? That's one.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Anyone fell like pulling up Leviticus 24:16 ?
See what the Bible decrees in the event of blasphemy ?

Now another troll thinks that the thread needs an emergency derail onto Judaism

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Are you so fucking ignorant that you don't know that Sharia Law is based in the Biblical book of Leviticus?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Are you so fucking ignorant that you don't know that Sharia Law is based in the Biblical book of Leviticus?

I alluded to that here, dippy

Grandma was slow, but she was old

Whats your excuse

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Are you so fucking ignorant that you don't know that Sharia Law is based in the Biblical book of Leviticus?

I alluded to that here, dippy

Grandma was slow, but she was old

Whats your excuse

I work for a living and don't have time to slog through all your bullshit unlike people who spout such Socialist bullshit as "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" and apparently wait for their check from Uncle sugar because you're here 24/7.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Are you so fucking ignorant that you don't know that Sharia Law is based in the Biblical book of Leviticus?

I alluded to that here, dippy

Grandma was slow, but she was old

Whats your excuse

I work for a living and don't have time to slog through all your bullshit unlike people who spout such Socialist bullshit as "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" and apparently wait for their check from Uncle sugar because you're here 24/7.

Thank you for admitting that you post out of ignorance

Not that we needed such an admission to know that

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Midol is the perfect thing for your issues

(Do you have anything on topic to add)