Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/21/2015 3:28:49 PM   
sheisreeds


Posts: 578
Joined: 7/8/2008
Status: offline
I think it is a mixed bag for a lot of reasons, none are new or insurmountable.

On the positive end portions of BDSM becoming more mainstream is not a bad thing. It will be nice when having a dungeon in your house doesn't automatically make you a suspect in a crime, a bad person, etc. Socially it will be nice when there is a day when having some bruises and having kinky sex doesn't make me a pervert, pversexed, or promiscuous.

On the negative end of the spectrum a lot of BDSM will remain edgy to the world at large for a long time to come, if not forever. Breath play, blood play, 24/7 relationships, TPE, and lots of other aspects of what goes on will likely remain fringe. It will occasionally end up in a negative light in the media, it will not be things that most people understand.

On the social side of things within BDSM groups I've observed multiple huge influxes of people over the years. Some of these new folks bring such great new energy and really find themselves (much like I did). They stick around for the long haul and are great contributors. Some others realize it really isn't their thing, at least not when it comes to public play and having a group of friends who are all 24/7. Still others like the stand and model variety of BDSM, and think it is cool. These folks are annoying but will leave the room if an edgy scene starts, or leave the table in a huff if something like blood play or TPE comes up. These people also never stay, some stick around even for a few years, but eventually move on. I've been terrified of this contingent taking over, and it has never happened. It's not going to happen. Also the stand and model folks as a rule don't use dungeon furniture >;) so the more of them there are at an event, the more we get to play >;)

So overall what I have seen is the social BDSM community grow exponentially. Thanks to this site, fetlife, an the world at large being more BDSM aware. I think people now have a much greater chance of figuring themselves and therefore being able to not be alone in their desires, have fulfilling relationships, and friends who get it.

Also I know in my city there has been an increase in groups, event spaces, and events. If cons and festivals are your thing there has to be one about every week of the year these days. There are at least 4 public dungeons within 50 miles of my home that have events at least every friday and saturday, some are doing something almost every night of the week.

If the number of people experimenting with fuzzy handcuffs and silk ties wasn't constantly expanding, I doubt there wouldn't be such a rich world of kink.

On another note, when groups grew for a bit I felt marginalized as an edge player. Some venues have house rules that require that any edge play be gone over with a DM, which means any scene I do would need a full itinerary and a damn powerpoint. Meanwhile many of the new folks weren't playing a lot, or not playing very hard so I felt a little voiceless.

Well apparently I wasn't the only one, there went from being 1 event where I felt comfortable scening, to over 3, all happen at least once a month, two are actually devoted to edge play. So yeah. Now I like gotta pick, and am my antics are gonna seem so fucking normal ;)

My point is things work themselves out in the end, while greater acceptance moves further and further along.

_____________________________

~ s.

Oh my darling, give me reason
give me something to believe in



You need a spankin' baby!

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/21/2015 4:58:37 PM   
petitespot


Posts: 288
Joined: 7/3/2006
From: Surfside Beach, SC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12

I've been hearing this expression recently and have had reason to think about it myself. I was curious to know what knowledge or opinions everyone had on this concept?


People can label it whatever they want.
When done correctly, it's fucking hot.

_____________________________


(in reply to orgasmdenial12)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/21/2015 5:21:16 PM   
LiveSpark


Posts: 808
Joined: 12/25/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: petitespot


quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12

I've been hearing this expression recently and have had reason to think about it myself. I was curious to know what knowledge or opinions everyone had on this concept?


People can label it whatever they want.
When done correctly, it's fucking hot.


How do you define done correctly? Tha sounds a whole lot like one twoo way to me.

_____________________________

I've been here as MontrealPhoenix, zephyr and
TheFireWithinMe.

I also have the sarcasm gene which is NOT to be taken seriously.

If you fall I'll always be there to catch you ~ Floor

(in reply to petitespot)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/21/2015 5:26:50 PM   
petitespot


Posts: 288
Joined: 7/3/2006
From: Surfside Beach, SC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LiveSpark


quote:

ORIGINAL: petitespot


quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12

I've been hearing this expression recently and have had reason to think about it myself. I was curious to know what knowledge or opinions everyone had on this concept?


People can label it whatever they want.
When done correctly, it's fucking hot.


How do you define done correctly? Tha sounds a whole lot like one twoo way to me.


Correctly for me is whatever floats my boat. Correctly for you is whatever floats your boat.
I'm the last person to preach one true way.


_____________________________


(in reply to LiveSpark)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/21/2015 6:07:05 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
I think it's great that kink's getting more mainstream even if it's a tamed down. It means more acceptance for the rest of us.

The Vanillarisation of Kink did cause me an awkward date once though, turned out the girl wasn't at all kinky she just wore collars because she was into heavy metal.

(in reply to petitespot)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/21/2015 6:39:54 PM   
TheTrickster


Posts: 16
Joined: 1/18/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

Shouldn't it be Vanillafication not Vanillarisation?

Seriously though, I have trouble with your OP because it seems contrary in terms. If it's vanilla it's not kink, so you can't vanillafy it. I have heard lots of talk about how 50 Shades has brought kink closer to mainstream... or at least brought some of the vanilla thrill seekers into the world of kink. But making something popular doesn't un-kink it and make it vanilla.

I agree that is exactly what I have been thinking.

_____________________________

Men have called me mad but the question is not yet settled whether madness is or is not the loftiest intelligence- Edgar Allan Poe

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/21/2015 11:19:19 PM   
seekingreality


Posts: 599
Joined: 8/11/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12

I've been hearing this expression recently and have had reason to think about it myself. I was curious to know what knowledge or opinions everyone had on this concept?


I haven't heard the term, but I'm guessing it could mean two things:

-- People who consider themselves vanilla are beginning to explore some BDSM practices, making the whole concept of BDSM more societally accepted.
-- The BDSM "culture" or "community" is being diminished by vanilla people embracing some of the practices and devaluing the whole concept of BDSM.

I have heard people preach both points. I think it's in the eye of the beholder. If you do what's right for you, you shouldn't care what anyone else is doing.

(in reply to orgasmdenial12)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/22/2015 2:58:38 AM   
NookieNotes


Posts: 1720
Joined: 11/10/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12
Are the edgier aspects of BDSM being chiselled away by those who would make the scene more palatable to vanilla adventurers? And, ultimately, will this result in the reinvention of a niche separate from the mainstream BDSM, remaining controversial, such as those who engage in breath play, or play without safewords, etc?

Hope this clarifies my question somewhat.


The edgier aspects of kink should be discouraged for the casual player. One should (IMO) learn to play safe before one leaves the rules behind, especially when it comes to dangerous play and potential abuse.

There are already hundreds of niches within BDSM. Look at ageplay, or watersports, or findom...

MOST of my play involves no safeword. I can't think of a single person who knows me in person and has seen me play who would not say I am safe.

Your friend is being a Won Twoo Wayist, insisting that everything he/she is a afraid of is abuse. Your friend is not defining BDSM for anyone except themselves. Neither am I. The definition you choose to accept is yours and your alone.

This is why words matter. Choose them carefully.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Why would what any other couple or couples think or do effect what my girl and I do and how we live in any way?



Yes, exactly. Unless you hope to learn something to do or not do.

_____________________________

Nookie
--
https://datingkinky.com

I Write! A few of my books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/author/msnnotes

(in reply to orgasmdenial12)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/22/2015 4:49:32 AM   
Bhruic


Posts: 985
Joined: 4/11/2012
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12

[snip]

It seems to me that, in some ways, BDSM is being redefined as, almost, a vanilla-style relationship with a roleplay of power or mild s&m that never goes beyond certain boundaries.

[snip]



Its a subtle point, but I don't think BDSM can be defined in any definitive or complete way, it is so diverse and subjective... and so can not be being redefined.

I think what you are describing is simply the incipient understanding of BDSM held by a contingent of curious, otherwise or formerly vanilla, people who are being drawn to it by exposure to milder forms popularized in the main stream.

Their understanding may be rudimentary, but that is as you would expect... understanding has to start somewhere. And the offshoot is that the lifestyle is slowly becoming more broadly accepted and understood, which seems like a good thing in the end.

_____________________________

pronounced "VROOick"

(in reply to orgasmdenial12)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/22/2015 10:24:40 AM   
orgasmdenial12


Posts: 613
Joined: 9/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
...making something popular doesn't un-kink it and make it vanilla.


It's not about popularity, it's about a kind of toning down, smoothing off the rough edges, repackaging it to eliminate the worrying, troublesome, scary bits. But in the process, eliminating the bits that make it really work, for some people.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Why would what any other couple or couples think or do effect what my girl and I do and how we live in any way?


Just to be clear, I'm not asking about what people do, I'm asking what people think about what it is that we do, in a general way.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko
I believe some kinks have become more mainstream while others are somewhat of a forgotten art if that makes sense.


Yes, it does make sense. And if this was an isolated conversation that's as far as my opinion would go. But having heard, recently, mutterings about the vanillarisation of kink, pieces started to click together in my mind and I wondered what other people thought of this subject and whether they had noticed shifting values in their own neck of the woods.

quote:

ORIGINAL: sheisreeds
...the stand and model folks as a rule don't use dungeon furniture >;) so the more of them there are at an event, the more we get to play >;)


Or the less dungeon furniture there is :-( I have been to one event recently where the 'dungeon' area was about 30 square metres, while the rest of the event was about 200 square metres x 4 floors! And the rules to use that little bit were really annoying and pathetic, as you mention in other parts of your post about needing to clear play with the DM. How can it be a play party if you need permission to play?!

quote:

ORIGINAL: sheisreeds
My point is things work themselves out in the end, while greater acceptance moves further and further along.


I think you made a very reasonable, well argued and experienced post and I thank you for it. I agreed with most posts you made and generally I like newcomers and the spread of BDSM. Perhaps I just feel, for the first time, on the wrong side of the majority, where it was my kink that was being slated. I hope that, as you say, it will all work out in the end.

quote:

ORIGINAL: seekingreality
If you do what's right for you, you shouldn't care what anyone else is doing.


I disagree. I, like many others, have long argued against s&m as a mental illness; to hear those views parroted out of the mouth of a so-called kinkster chilled me. It felt like abandonment from the in group. I think we have to be very careful about the portrayal of our scene, and when common kinks such as masochism or TPE are called abuse by kinksters, we need to sit up and take notice.

quote:

ORIGINAL: NookieNotes
The edgier aspects of kink should be discouraged for the casual player.


I hope that, by this, you mean the newbie player, rather than the casual player. One can be highly experienced and yet still casual. There have been times in my life when, due to relationships, work, moving and other preferences, that I did not wish to commit full-time to BDSM and simply engaged in it on an ad-hoc basis as and when I preferred; yet I still preferred the edgier aspects.

quote:

ORIGINAL: NookieNotes
Your friend is being a Won Twoo Wayist


I did not say they were a friend. This person is a contributor on another discussion forum.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic
...the offshoot is that the lifestyle is slowly becoming more broadly accepted and understood, which seems like a good thing in the end.


Except, I don't think the lifestyle is becoming understood. Or, at least, not the aspects that make it exciting for many people. If acceptance only means a traditional relationship with a bit of teasy spanking thrown in then it is hardly radical. What needs to be accepted is exactly the edgy, difficult aspects. If we were waiting for the softer aspects to be understood, then we achieved that long ago. It's not fluffy handcuffs and silk scarves that needs understanding, there is no prejudice against that anyway - it's the harder aspects that still mark us as outside the norm, and so it's those aspects that need acceptance and understanding. To join the scene, yet reject those aspects, is no understanding at all; if anything it represents a deeper betrayal, a kind of hostile take-over of the entire concept of BDSM and its reason for being outside the mainstream.

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/22/2015 11:01:55 AM   
NookieNotes


Posts: 1720
Joined: 11/10/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12
I hope that, by this, you mean the newbie player, rather than the casual player. One can be highly experienced and yet still casual. There have been times in my life when, due to relationships, work, moving and other preferences, that I did not wish to commit full-time to BDSM and simply engaged in it on an ad-hoc basis as and when I preferred; yet I still preferred the edgier aspects.


What you mean by casual and what i mean by casual are not the same thing.

To me, someone who takes this lifestyle and the things in in casually, do not bother to learn the risks before playing, etc., is a casual player.

If you fit into that group, then I mean you. If you actually educate yourself, no matter how much time you have to spend as part of your life, then I don't mean you.

And no, I don't mean newbies. I have known many newbies to dive right into learning everything they can about risk and doing ti all very safely. Those specific newbies do not take the lifestyle casually at all.

_____________________________

Nookie
--
https://datingkinky.com

I Write! A few of my books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/author/msnnotes

(in reply to orgasmdenial12)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/22/2015 11:33:23 AM   
GoddessManko


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/6/2013
From: Dante's Inferno
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NookieNotes

The edgier aspects of kink should be discouraged for the casual player. One should (IMO) learn to play safe before one leaves the rules behind, especially when it comes to dangerous play and potential abuse.

I disagree only to a slight degree. In my experience edge players typically were more casual, they would get enough of their frenzy out of their system to be able to function normally. I have never had someone lie to me about their limits and capabilities except one I met here a few months back. I was surprised at how shitty the experience had been because I have done this for a long time. I would say CS has an unusual diversity of kinksters from my experience. My subs never had any real limits and were willing to explore. My kinkiest was a female sub. We played only once together because she tried to turn it into race play and that kind of took away from the experience though she was trying to make things "hotter". The dangers of being proactive as a sub during a scene.
Someone not being an edge player is not a big deal for me as long as they have a willingness to explore. And edge play in itself is not a must for me. Chances are if you aren't flexible, I won't do more complex shibari and rigging with you. I might ask you to take yoga class so I can eventually.

_____________________________

Happy consent is the name of the game. You are my perfect Mistress. - my collared.

http://submissivemale.blogspot.com/

The Bird of Hermes is my name, eating my wings to make me tame.

(in reply to NookieNotes)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/22/2015 11:36:22 AM   
camille65


Posts: 5746
Joined: 7/11/2007
From: Austin Texas
Status: offline
Honestly to me the whole 'kink' thing is so broad encompassing that no way can I declare what is kink for anyone other than myself. One person may think a blindfold is really edgy, others are into blood play.

If someone calls themselves kinky, groovy. Even if they just use a blindfold occasionally.

I can't define it for others, be they dabblers or wholly living it 24/7. That is why the idea of 'vanillarisation' makes no sense to me.

If we really are an exclusive club, I never received my decoder ring.

_____________________________


~Love your life! (It is the only one you'll get).




(in reply to GoddessManko)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/22/2015 11:53:49 AM   
GoddessManko


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/6/2013
From: Dante's Inferno
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: camille65

If we really are an exclusive club, I never received my decoder ring.


DECODER RING ACTIVATE!!!

_____________________________

Happy consent is the name of the game. You are my perfect Mistress. - my collared.

http://submissivemale.blogspot.com/

The Bird of Hermes is my name, eating my wings to make me tame.

(in reply to camille65)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/22/2015 1:17:28 PM   
Bhruic


Posts: 985
Joined: 4/11/2012
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic
...the offshoot is that the lifestyle is slowly becoming more broadly accepted and understood, which seems like a good thing in the end.


Except, I don't think the lifestyle is becoming understood. Or, at least, not the aspects that make it exciting for many people. If acceptance only means a traditional relationship with a bit of teasy spanking thrown in then it is hardly radical. What needs to be accepted is exactly the edgy, difficult aspects. If we were waiting for the softer aspects to be understood, then we achieved that long ago. It's not fluffy handcuffs and silk scarves that needs understanding, there is no prejudice against that anyway - it's the harder aspects that still mark us as outside the norm, and so it's those aspects that need acceptance and understanding. To join the scene, yet reject those aspects, is no understanding at all; if anything it represents a deeper betrayal, a kind of hostile take-over of the entire concept of BDSM and its reason for being outside the mainstream.


I understand what you are saying, but people have to walk before they can run. I realize that fluffy handcuffs and silk scarves were "understood" a long time ago, but people who have never done so before are actually beginning to explore more than they ever have before. Perhaps some of them will stay in the mild zone, but some will progress in to edgier play, and begin to understand it in context.

This, as I see it, is an inescapable part of the process of acceptance and understanding.

Perhaps there will emerge a whole new community of mild BDSM players who do not engage in the edgier play that you or I are comfortable with. It could very well happen, and they may become a very distinct community separate from what you know. I don't see the existance of such a community hijacking the agenda of the existing community though.

It might make it difficult for a while, as you have described, to know what kind of play party you are going to... but that doesn't seem to me very new. The stand and model folks seem to me to have always been part of the BDSM community proper. I have often, in the past, found myself at play parties where very little play was happening... and no sex at all!.

The edgier folks will always have their peeps and their community... there are so many faces of BDSM that there have always been niches in the community... I am sure there is room for a few more.

There is a strange kind of hypocrisy in complaining about an "us vs. them" culture, and the "one true way" types, and yet be anxious that you feel your clique is being infiltrated.

I am not saying this is you, but it is a sentiment I have noticed.

< Message edited by Bhruic -- 1/22/2015 1:33:21 PM >


_____________________________

pronounced "VROOick"

(in reply to orgasmdenial12)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/22/2015 4:14:39 PM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1820
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: online
A new word? I don't know. The idea behind the word, maybe its a good thing. No longer will kink be seen as "odd".

_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to GoddessManko)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/22/2015 5:13:04 PM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
If that is your meaning . . . Heterosexuals have been bringing the "mild side" to the "wild side" ever since BDSM leaked out from the leatherman in 50s and SSC banner wavers have deliberately been doing that since the 80s.

All in all, as the BDSM community grew from niche gay clubs in sleazy gay bars with glory holes to the posh hotel convention crowd it is today, the median has found a milder more politically correct and socially acceptable center. However, if you are talking numbers, not averages, there are a hell of a lot more extreme edge players now than there ever were before. It's just that the milder side of the BDSM crowd has grown exponentially in comparison. So now, even though our numbers have grown, the edge players are severally out numbered by comparison and it swings the median further towards the mild side.

That's my perspective on it anyway.

quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12

quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
...making something popular doesn't un-kink it and make it vanilla.


It's not about popularity, it's about a kind of toning down, smoothing off the rough edges, repackaging it to eliminate the worrying, troublesome, scary bits. But in the process, eliminating the bits that make it really work, for some people..........



ETA: Thank you for following up and expounding upon your OP. As far as your other replies go about "certain boundaries". I think that is very regional. At national conventions you will see most every style of relationship and play.

< Message edited by ResidentSadist -- 1/22/2015 5:26:24 PM >


_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to orgasmdenial12)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/25/2015 8:04:10 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: seekingreality


quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12

I've been hearing this expression recently and have had reason to think about it myself. I was curious to know what knowledge or opinions everyone had on this concept?


I haven't heard the term, but I'm guessing it could mean two things:

-- People who consider themselves vanilla are beginning to explore some BDSM practices, making the whole concept of BDSM more societally accepted.
-- The BDSM "culture" or "community" is being diminished by vanilla people embracing some of the practices and devaluing the whole concept of BDSM.

I have heard people preach both points. I think it's in the eye of the beholder. If you do what's right for you, you shouldn't care what anyone else is doing.


I find the bolded above to really only come from those that ultimately like the whole "culture" and "community" because it makes them feel as though they are different and unique (which is kind of funny itself).

The reality is like anything else; you have those with mild interests to the more zealous (in this case "edgier" interests).

If another's perspective makes one tone down their own life, it is not the fault of the one who "made" them do it, but the need for self acceptance of the one who did it.

I'm not heavily into S&M or edgy stuff. I've been around here for a very (very) long time and I remember when I first found this site, some of the stuff people talked about left me picking my jaw off the floor in shock (harder to do now, lol). The less edgy people didn't speak up as often, and when they did, there was a a "true way(er)" or two who tried to knock them down. For some, it scared them back into not talking and feeling like they didn't belong. For others, like me, I just kind of rolled my eyes, pointed out that obviously myself and the true way(er) might be able to laugh over drinks, but a relationship is out of the question.

But I have never been one to follow a crowd. From the previous comments, neither do a lot of others here (mostly who are also "old timers" like myself), and I can tell you that of those, I am pretty sure we are very different in how we want or conduct our relationships. Yet, none of us is demeaning the others because we are not the same.

I guess if you have bitch that more people becoming involved in something makes it less worth doing, it really is your psychological issue, no one else's.

(in reply to seekingreality)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/25/2015 11:31:10 PM   
orgasmdenial12


Posts: 613
Joined: 9/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
Heterosexuals have been bringing the "mild side" to the "wild side" ever since BDSM leaked out from the leatherman in 50s and SSC banner wavers have deliberately been doing that since the 80s.


Uh, that might be the US history, but s&m was largely a straight scene in the UK and Europe for about 100 years before it touched on gay culture, and way before it got to the US in the 1950s.

It might seem a small point, but it always surprises me how many people think that the US history of BDSM is *the* history of BDSM. It really isn't - there's a reason that caning has been called the English Vice since the 1800s.

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? - 1/26/2015 12:18:17 AM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
I would love to read about BDSM's appearance in European hetro social culture from the 1850s. Can you recall where you read that?

quote:

ORIGINAL: orgasmdenial12

quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
Heterosexuals have been bringing the "mild side" to the "wild side" ever since BDSM leaked out from the leatherman in 50s and SSC banner wavers have deliberately been doing that since the 80s.


Uh, that might be the US history, but s&m was largely a straight scene in the UK and Europe for about 100 years before it touched on gay culture, and way before it got to the US in the 1950s.

It might seem a small point, but it always surprises me how many people think that the US history of BDSM is *the* history of BDSM. It really isn't - there's a reason that caning has been called the English Vice since the 1800s.



_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to orgasmdenial12)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: The Vanillarisation of Kink? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.090