BamaD
Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote:
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote:
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer I don't. I see two different kinds of what I know different people will see as cowardly. So, if Obama or any other president sends troops into action...such as sending the SEAL team into action against Bin Laden...from a place where he is safe from harm...like the operators of the drones...he's a coward in your opinion? Why is my view on what is or is not cowardly relevant to you? Because you're the one that brought cowardice into play. I'm just asking you to clarify. If the operators of drones...who are removed from the action...are cowards, then do you hold that same standard to our commander in chief? I'm not clear what you're driving at, CD. My point is about how certain ways of fighting are seen by the people who are doing the fighting (or who are under attack). You opened this (sub-) debate by saying 'I do notice that weapons that use projectiles such as broken glass, anti-personnel mines and booby traps are illegal. Someone may want to tell those brave jihadist terrorists that.' Clearly, you see these tactics as cowardly. But, equally, you must know that, for instance, drone attacks are seen as cowardly by those who are attacked by them? No? Actually peon, my bigger point was PS's insistence that gunshot wounds fit under his source's list of superflous injuries. So I brought the list of illegal items cited by his source. While the use of the items by the Jihadists is cowardly...in my opinion...my main point was they're illegal. Guns are not unless they use, spespecifically, ammunition that fits under the illegal category. What I was driving at with my question to you was that your comment seemed to indicate that you, along with these unnamed others, see drone operators as cowardly. I'm asking for clarification. Either you do or you do not. And if you fo, then I assume you see the President in the same way. This is what I call the CA style of debate, you use some people say or maybe to preface what you want to say. That way if called on it you can hide behind the fact that you were only pointing out a point of view that exists or a possibility but not the speakers responsibility.
_____________________________
Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.
|