BamaD -> RE: Another cop shooting of "unarmed" teen. (1/31/2015 7:56:38 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote:
Can you read, or are you just chronically stupid, the second and tenth post on the thread was someone posting articles saying the cops were wrong.... I can read, QK, and those second and tenth posts only suggested doubt about the cops' story (as it's emerged so far). It's OK to question what the police say, occasionally, I feel. From the article.... A passenger in the car, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of safety concerns, has disputed the official account, saying officers came up on the car from behind and fired four times into the driver's side window. The passenger also said the officers did not yell any commands before they fired, and that the car struck the officer after Hernandez was shot and lost control of the vehicle. I might be an american but that says, the cops were wrong and what they are saying is a lie... Wouldnt that be.... I dont know saying the cops were wrong? the Other article says A teen inside the car when Denver police officers shot and killed a 17-year old girl on Monday tells 9Wants to Know her friend was shot before the car ended up striking a Denver police officer. It's a version of events that falls into direct conflict with what Denver Police Chief Robert White told reporters shortly after the fatal shooting. That says in plain english theres a conflict... which is another way of saying the police were ....wrong... So both articles that someone posted... say that the police are wrong, but thats not anyone making a comment saying the police are wrong.... Its so clear now.... If the cops were off to the side of the car, firing without warning, how did one of them get a broken leg? Easy lie to bust.
|
|
|
|