NorthernGent
Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Zonie63 I was just wondering if there was some sort of equivalent of how we in America like Westerns and sometimes take a more idealized approach to history. The reason I ask is because I know some right-wingers who would adamantly deny that they are even the slightest bit racist, yet they still might look at our own past through rose-colored glasses and overlook some of the more "inconvenient" truths of our history. And it's very often the case where, when we Americans turn up in other people's countries, the stated motive of the right-wing is that we're there to save the world from itself, a 21st century version of "White Man's Burden." I don't think wanting to invade other people's countries is the preserve if the right here. The left, many of them, believe we have a duty to help people in trouble, which I suppose is a form of 'the white man's burden'. WW1 changed everything in England, including the idea of glory in war. The education curriculum undertook an about-turn, and we were schooled to believe that war is costly, horrific and something to abhor. Consequently, popular books and television programmes will usually portray war as soldiers mired in horror due to the excesses of politicians and militarists; students of history would not agree. In terms of how this relates to the British Empire, the average person has been conditioned to not look at it with rose tinted spectacles; this does not account for everyone, however. As always the answer lies somewhere in the middle. While England has undoubtedly left a mark on the world by providing a legacy which other people gave copied, the British Army were capable of shooting a lot of people in Amritsar for the crime of peaceful protest. Which of the two other people focus on is their call. My understanding is that it can go both ways in that there are Anglophiles in the world and people who only see Imperialism when thinking of England.
_____________________________
I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits. Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.
|