IrishMist
Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005 Status: offline
|
~Direct reply to the OP~ I have not read Imaginative Sex, so I really can not say if it is about kink or not. I have read all the Gor books, and I do agree with you in that they are not about kink. Once again, though, we have come across a difference of interpretation over what BDSM stands for lol. I take a very literal view; Bondage, Dominance, Sado/Masochism. In my view, BDSM is nothing more than kink. So yes, I do agree that BDSM is not, and has nothing to do with being Gorean; but that some Gorean's DO utilize kink. quote:
I think Norman's comments about how love and M/s can intertwine Before I throw my two cents in, I need to point out that I do follow the Gorean philosophy of natural order. It has always struck a chord within me, so it is something that I accept and live by. I am fortunate to have been with two separate men who share my views on this. Love, in my thinking, has no place within a M/s relationship (and please note that I said IN MY THINKING) I believe that love blurs the lines, on both sides of the kneel. It could simply be that because I am such a hard core masochist, that I don't believe that if he 'loves' me, he can provide what I need in that area. Or it could be that I am just so fucked in the head, that I refuse to believe it. Either way, I don't want or need love from Dave. Mutual respect, and an understanding of each other are all that is required. Because we do understand each other, punishment has no place in our relationship. We agreed early on; failure on my part to follow his lead, leads to an ending of the relationship. Failure on his part to understand where he can push me, and by how much, leads to the ending of the relationship. No discussion, no second chances. The introduction of 'love' into such a structured relationship...would blur the lines and cause both of us to fail. A harsh way of looking at things; but, it works for us. He keeps me balanced and serene; and I keep him focused. quote:
If something is not beautiful, it is not Gorean I agree with this. Of course, once again, we could argue differing definitions of what 'beautiful' is. If I use it to describe Gorean; I would have to say 'beautiful is a woman graceful and serene in her acceptance of her enslavement' It's not about looks; but about attitude. Kind of a ramble...but there's my useless two cents.
_____________________________
If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.
|