Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
As you've seen by replies so far, when you post in the BDSM community, by and large, and mention Gor, that's the only world anyone hears, ignoring all the other discussion points you've raised, and why. Good luck. quote:
ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist I posted this in General BDSM Discussion because of the author's comments about M/s, not his writings about Gor. His comments about real life M/s and his book Imaginative Sex interested me. He is outside the BDSM (and Gorean) community, does not live the lifestyle, but as a philosopher he conveys his image of consensual slavery. There is some interest on the forums about love, emotion and how they relate to kink, I think this adds another view point to examine. I agree with Norman that BDSM is not Gorean. I disagree that he seems to imply BDSM isn't pretty. Saying slavery in Gor books are about BDSM is completely missing their philosophy. African slave traders used shackles, BDSM uses shackles, that doesn't mean BDSM and African slave traders have anything in common. Goreans got lumped in under the big kink umbrella of BDSM, but as I said in my book thread reply, ". . . If you want kink, get Imaginative Sex (same author). It is more about kink than The Chronicles of Gor is." What do you think? I think Norman's comments about how love and M/s can intertwine define some of my own values, though love is not required for M/s. I just like M/s so I do it with the one's I love. I am also a sadist and my slave is maso, very smart and she learns fast. Spanking a masochist for discipline doesn't seem the best course of action. I mean, she had an orgasm while getting her nipples pierced. I don't think spanking her is gonna' teach her a lesson. I love the ritual and symbolism of corporal punishment for discipline (not funishment) of my slave, but discipline doesn't have to equal corporal punishment nor is CP the best method for teaching intelligent human beings behavior modification. What do you think? Q io9/Charlie Jane Anders: Have you spent any time among the Gorean communities on the internet, such as Second Life? What do you think of the popularity of real-life Gorean slavery among some people in the BDSM community? A John Norman: . . . [edit] I know nothing about "real-life Gorean slavery among some people in the BDSM community." The "BDSM" reference worries me. I dissociate myself from BDSM, at least as I understand it. I may, of course, misunderstand it. I wonder if one would settle merely for "real-life Gorean slavery," because, as I understand it, BDSM is not Gorean. If something is not beautiful, it is not Gorean. In any event, I am assuming that what is involved here, in any case, is consensual. If a woman chooses to submit herself, voluntarily, to a master, it seems to me that is her business, and his business. She would then, of course, be a slave, and would be treated as a slave. One supposes remarkable fulfillments may occur in such an arrangement. It is, of course, important to treat the slave, however uncompromisingly strict you are with her, however much she might fear you, in a humane way, as one would any other animal. Some men, I gather, dislike women, and enjoy hurting them. That makes no sense to me. Women are wonderful, and precious. It is a delight to own one; why would one hurt her? What would be the point of that, mere sadistic pleasure? I think we might distinguish between, say, S/M sex, or sadomasochistic sex, and M/S sex, or Master/Slave Sex. In a sense they seem opposite. Love is important. It is not to be confused with cruelty. Gratuitous cruelty seems to me uncalled for, and ugly, morally and aesthetically. Too, it seems unworthy of a true master. The point is loving and serving, and owning and mastering, not hurting. To be sure, the slave must understand that if she is not pleasing, she is subject to discipline. She is not to be left in doubt that she is a slave. It is easy to avoid discipline; she need only be obedient, submissive, and found pleasing, wholly, and in all ways. Sometimes a slave may desire to be reassured of her bondage. There are many ways in which the master, if he wishes, may see to this. I have written an entire book, the Imaginative Sex book, in which my views on such matters should be reasonably clear. [Edit: broken into paragraphs . . . because you know, some people actually use paragraphs] Referenced Interview: John Norman, the philosophy professor who created the barbaric world of Gor
|