RE: Hillary's E-Mails

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Hillary's E-Mails

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary's E-Mails

Page: << < prev 10 11 [12] 13 14 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/13/2015 10:27:43 AM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

Interesting take on Gowdy from a Politico interview

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/03/trey-gowdy-hillary-clinton-116040.html#.VQMd-OHY63k

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 221

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/13/2015 10:38:22 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Yeah, Harry Gowdy is one of those effete eastern elite intellectuals Agnew warned us about.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to KenDckey)

Profile

Post #: 222

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/13/2015 3:59:05 PM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

I like trey gowdy and hope he gets the cooperation he needs from everyone to do his job, and the force of law behind him to do it when that cooperation isn't forthcoming.

while im here, looks like I can post this again too:

Fox Derangement Syndrome:

"Fox Derangement Syndrome is an idiomatic phrase used to refer to wildly exaggerated overreaction to the news, opinion shows, and very existence of the Fox News Channel. Although the term did not exist at the time, a good example occurred during the December 1, 2003 broadcast of Hardball with Chris Matthews, in which liberal Democrat political commentator Chris Matthews asked liberal Democrat politician Howard Dean, "Would you break up Fox?", to which Dean replied: "On ideological grounds, absolutely yes."

all the other news stations and networks are all left all the time---fox, while on the whole leans right, includes balance in ALL their shows and whats more, has multiple personalities with their own shows, or who are regulars on shows, who are liberal.

it beats the living daylights out of me how anyone who watches any other network, and then fox by comparison, could come to the conclusion they are not balanced in the regard I just pointed out.

the only thing I can imagine is liberals are so immersed in the rest of the media that they think it passes for normal reality, and when they see fox, it jars their status quo.

(in reply to KenDckey)

Profile

Post #: 223

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/13/2015 5:07:55 PM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Oh its a good job he has me on ignore.....im in poking idiots mode....and theres a lot of it about today.
Anyone up for a poke?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to bounty44)

Profile

Post #: 224

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/13/2015 5:55:30 PM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

Lucy Can I be the poker and you be the pokee? hehehehehehe

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Profile

Post #: 225

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/13/2015 6:29:45 PM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Lol, nope, but ill give ya points there Ken for trying
careful how you spend em
;)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to KenDckey)

Profile

Post #: 226

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/13/2015 6:36:34 PM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

Never hurts to try LOL

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Profile

Post #: 227

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 4:52:19 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

last night megyn Kelly mentioned how they have been asking the state department ever since they (the Kelly file) learned about the document Hillary was supposed to have signed, to confirm/deny process. they have asked 4 times and the state department hasn't been forthcoming. apparently the same things going on with the state department press conferences.

she told the audience they have filed a foia request for confirmation or denial of the document, and even through megyn Kelly has a law degree, they had another lawyer on talking about the process. she (the other lawyer, lis wiehl) mentioned how the state department can take up to 30 days to even acknowledge the request. she said there are 9 criteria by which foia requests can be denied, and having studied all 9 of them before the show, she said she cannot see how any of them could legitimately prevent the state department from divulging the knowledge the foia request is seeking.

the word "stonewalling" was bandied about it a little.

and while im here they mentioned this on the show last night too:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to KenDckey)

Profile

Post #: 228

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 4:54:33 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

maybe the poll somehow inadvertently oversampled the bitter people clinging to their guns and religion crowd?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to bounty44)

Profile

Post #: 229

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 4:58:32 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

Judge Orders State Dept. to Release Records From Clinton Trips

A federal judge on Friday ruled on behalf of Citizens United, a conservative advocacy group, in its lawsuit against the State Department for documents related to Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure there.

Judge Gladys Kessler of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the State Department to produce passenger manifests from 47 overseas trips that Mrs. Clinton made as secretary of state. Citizens United requested the manifests last July through a Freedom of Information Act Request.

The State Department, the judge wrote, must release the first batch of records by April 3, with more being released every two weeks; all the documents must be given to the group no later than Aug. 1.

The group requested the flight manifests to examine whether Clinton Foundation donors had accompanied Mrs. Clinton on State Department trips.

“Clearly, the State Department is not getting the benefit of the doubt from judges anymore,” David N. Bossie, president of Citizens United. said Friday.

Her credibility is worse now than ever

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to bounty44)

Profile

Post #: 230

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 5:09:45 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

yes, it will be interesting to watch that unfold.

and since so many millions of dollars were given to the Clinton foundation by foreign governments while she was secretary of state, that's another factor driving the desire to have access to all her emails---not to mention her staffs.

megyn Kelly last night interviewed some fellow from a government watchdog group (I don't recall his name or the group) who said they filed a foia request for records from one of Hillary's staff who moved back and forth between the state department and fund raising responsibilities for the foundation.

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 3/14/2015 5:14:33 AM >

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 231

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 5:16:30 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Rumors are that she was selling future favors, promising that when she became president that donations to her foundation would buy certain privileges

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to bounty44)

Profile

Post #: 232

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 5:26:49 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

the phrase "follow the money" comes to mind.

so again, it will be interesting to see...

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 233

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 5:38:12 AM

DaddySatyr

Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Rumors are that she was selling future favors, promising that when she became president that donations to her foundation would buy certain privileges

Kind of like when her bitch, Slick Willy, was running for re-election and took a $500,000 donation from the Chinese government. When people questioned that, it was a part of the "vast, right-wing, conspiracy".

Talk about a candidate for the tin foil hat!

Michael

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 234

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 7:04:12 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

People buying into Faux shows that just as Bill O'Really said (and I paraphrase) the common American voter is fucking stupid.

But it is a poll, somewhat of less value than used asswipe.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to DaddySatyr)

Profile

Post #: 235

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 9:30:54 AM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/13/clinton-emails-poll_n_6865826.html?1426277678

Polling data from the Chicago Tribune. Seems Dems may be watching closer than Reps but Dems are more sceptical than Reps.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 236

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 9:54:07 AM

Aylee

Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/13/clinton-emails-poll_n_6865826.html?1426277678

Polling data from the Chicago Tribune. Seems Dems may be watching closer than Reps but Dems are more sceptical than Reps.

Dems/liberals eat their own.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to KenDckey)

Profile

Post #: 237

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 10:44:06 AM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

LOL There are times LOL

(in reply to Aylee)

Profile

Post #: 238

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 10:44:45 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

as a spin off from this thread, one of the things that seems to come up frequently in the on air conversations on the topic, is who do the democrats have waiting in the wings if this ends up disqualifying Hillary somehow from a democratic nominee run.

those other candidates would be there otherwise, but theres been so much emphasis on Hillary's coronation so to speak, that no one's been paying a whole lot of attention to other people.

there is joe biden, jim webb, Bernie sanders and despite her saying she isn't interested, Elizabeth warren keeps being mentioned. one particular show I was watching that was talking about this mentioned other potential candidates, but I didn't recognize their names.

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 3/14/2015 10:48:04 AM >

(in reply to Aylee)

Profile

Post #: 239

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/14/2015 11:13:35 AM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

Wasserman Schultz is out there too But I don't think she will make it. I think she has made to many enemies within the party

(in reply to bounty44)

Profile

Post #: 240