Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Hillary's E-Mails


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary's E-Mails Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/17/2015 5:20:33 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		at the same time though ken---every day a journalist at the state dept press conferences asks jen psaki about the official document disclosure form that is supposed to be on record and that Hillary Clinton is supposed to have signed---and every day she says she has no further information as to the status of that search. it would (should) take a clerk about five minutes to produce the document in question...

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 261
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/17/2015 5:26:02 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

And then, is the White House behind the whole "scandal"

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/03/270959-obama-adviser-valerie-jarrett-reported-behind-leak-hillary-clinton-email-scandal/


I agree "the plot thickens" but on the surface, given what an incredibly presumptive candidate Hillary is, one wonders why the Obama administration would do anything to harm the chances of another democrat being in the white house.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 262
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/17/2015 9:59:50 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		here's from the Kelly file last night...I think "stonewalling" being the operative word.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/megyn-kelly-hillary-stonewalling


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 263
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/17/2015 6:21:06 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		just watched the first few minutes of the Kelly file and they led with this story---a clip of jen psaki, the state dept spokesman, saying after an examination of Hillary Clinton's personnel file, that she did not sign the document certifying that all her records had been turned over to the department. I suppose that is not surprising in the least...

megyn Kelly had shannen coffin on again and they talked about US Code 2071, which might have been brought up here before, but is worth sharing again:

"(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States."


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 264
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/17/2015 6:40:50 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		yeah I had to certify that I had turned in everything when I retired from the Army in 1986

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 265
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/18/2015 6:38:58 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline 		And. . . .

It looks like Hillary's server was quite open to spoofing and hacking.

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-03-18/hillary-clinton-s-e-mail-was-vulnerable-to-spoofing-

But ya know, rules are for the little people.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 266
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/18/2015 7:25:30 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		to me, the story just gets worse and worse. I only caught a few minutes of the news/commentary tonight and one of the things was the embarrassing performance given by jen psaki at the state department press conference trying to gloss over Hillary Clinton's not signing the document certifying that she had turned over all documents to the department.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 267
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/18/2015 7:33:48 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		seems to me that the dems are jumping the Hillary ship

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 268
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/18/2015 7:38:10 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States."



This seems to say that if Hillary kept even a small scrap of paper that belonged to the government or (God forbid!), if she destroyed the smallest scrap, she'd be disqualified from being president?

Oh, GOD, please let this have legs!



Michael

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 269
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/19/2015 2:02:48 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States."



This seems to say that if Hillary kept even a small scrap of paper that belonged to the government or (God forbid!), if she destroyed the smallest scrap, she'd be disqualified from being president?

Oh, GOD, please let this have legs!



Michael


Amen

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 270
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/19/2015 2:15:45 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		http://news.yahoo.com/democratic-support-hillary-clinton-softens-reuters-ipsos-poll-050522029.html

Sounds like they are dropping like flies.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 271
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/19/2015 3:03:38 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		http://news.yahoo.com/whistleblower-state-department-employees-don-t-sign-separation-031606877.html

A double standard article


(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 272
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/19/2015 4:01:37 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		that was megyn Kelly and shannen coffin's point yes...


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 273
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/19/2015 4:03:44 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		I saw that fellow being interviewed ken when he was saying those things...

the explanation by psaki was very lame (and got made fun of) and its also puzzling how Clinton's two predecessors didn't sign the document either.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 274
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/19/2015 4:05:28 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		Yeah Double standards never work well. Doesn't make any difference to whom it is applied.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 275
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/20/2015 1:45:43 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		http://news.yahoo.com/expert-clinton-emails-could-compromised-third-party-spam-024604076.html

It only gets worse for the Clintons.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 276
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/22/2015 9:31:45 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		I have a poll on democratic thought on the scandal...the image I have is too big, and when I compress it, its too small...more later.





< Message edited by bounty44 -- 3/22/2015 9:34:11 AM >

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 277
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/22/2015 10:42:55 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline 		Yeah. And it turns out that the State department's email servers don't have SPF enabled either.

So... 8 tenths of the story is criticising Clinton for not enabling SPF, and right at the end... and u am guessing you didn't get that far, it concedes that the State department has done the same thing!

Oh noes... that makes the while story look like bait for mouth breathers.

I am surprised you missed that.



_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 278
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/22/2015 10:51:53 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
I think I may have to do more than one ...







Michael



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 3/22/2015 10:52:32 AM >

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 279
RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 3/22/2015 10:53:19 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
and again:






Michael

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 280
Page:   <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary's E-Mails Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094