DaddySatyr
Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011 From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist quote:
ORIGINAL: Marini quote:
ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist Unfortunately, no. . . Great post as usual RS. After reading this, many people should be "glad" that the person they were supposed to meet did not show. I would venture to guess that many "no shows", are not anyone that they would want to meet anyway. If you are that "put off", frightened, unsure, or whatever, who wants to meet you anyway? I am often glad when people disappear, run-away, or flake off early, so that I wasted less time dealing with them. I suspect a lot of no shows are because they are just harboring a passing sexual fantasy, not a real desire. When faced with the reality of face to face meeting, they just can't do it. I'm reaching a bit with this example but . . . a Domme friend got tired of all the castration fantasies she was getting from some Yahoo group. So she would says yes. Then tell them that she has a sadistic friend (me) that would be glad to do it while she supervises and stuck them on the phone with me. I would ask them if they wanted to be iced down, anesthetized on go cold turkey so they could sacrifice their balls and their to their Mistress as a gift. I would ask about what kind of closures they wanted and if they thought they could properly maintain the aftercare of surgical staples . . . yup, faced with the reality of a guy they believed would really cut their balls off shut them up in a hurry. I think I ruined about 3 or 4 guys wet dreams. So when fantasies meet reality, those without a true desire and are just harboring a passing sexual whim, they go running for the hills. I don't think this is just about this particular lifestyle, per se. I haven't experienced a no-show in quite a while until recently, but I think it's a matter of time invested, before a meeting is set up. For me, I insist upon some kind of vocal communication. This isn't for "verification". This is because I find I get a better feel for someone (if they're really on-board, if they may not be entirely honest, etc.), if I can hear their voice. There is too much possibility of deception, when using a text medium. Also, there are so many nuances of vocal communication that add more information to the mix (is the person sarcastic? Very quite?). On rare occasions, when I can be persuaded to do so, I will not set aside more than 30 minutes (including driving time) to meet with someone with whom I haven't spoken. This has worked out very well for me. As for all the people that treat voice communication as "the holiest of holies"? Two thoughts that I have found to be true: A) They are "time wasters" (I think it could be chalked up to fear or, as RS stated; the reality smacking them in the face) 2) If they value their voice, that much where they're going to make me jump through hoops to hear it, they're probably not a very good match for me (because that's the first of many hoops through which they'll be expecting me to jump). Michael
< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 3/12/2015 12:45:47 AM >
_____________________________
A Stone in My Shoe Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me? "For that which I love, I will do horrible things"
|